Suppr超能文献

呼叫电子心脏病专家:通过对心脏病学电子会诊服务的定性分析洞察初级保健医生的转诊行为

Paging the eCardiologist: insights into referral behaviour of primary care physicians from qualitative analysis of a cardiology eConsult service.

作者信息

Chan Elizabeth, Johnson Christopher B, Liddy Clare, Keely Erin, Gauthier Nadine, Turek Michele, Shoki Alborz, Archibald Douglas

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada.

Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2018 Sep 2;4:2055207618792140. doi: 10.1177/2055207618792140. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to investigate determinants of primary care physician cardiology referrals by performing qualitative analysis of questions asked by primary care physicians in cardiology electronic consultation services (eConsults).

SETTING

A health region in eastern Ontario, Canada, where primary care providers have had access to an eConsult service since 2010.

PARTICIPANTS

We included all consecutive cardiology eConsults initiated by registered primary care provider users of our eConsult service and who initiated one or more eConsult between July 2014 and January 2015. We excluded eConsults in which the primary care provider attached a document without asking a question. A convenience sample of 100 consecutive eConsults initiated by 61 primary care providers was analysed after excluding 14 eConsults. Primary care provider eConsult questions are categorised into thematic categories based on the constant comparison method of qualitative analysis with external validation by content experts. Secondary outcomes include sample primary care provider eConsult questions to illustrate each theme and any emergent subthemes.

RESULTS

Thematic saturation occurred after analysis of 30 eConsults. An additional 70 eConsults were coded with no new emergent themes. Themes include exceptions to clinical guidelines (=13), non-cardiac treatment in a cardiac patient (=13), specific investigation/management (=18), interpretation of diagnostic testing (=46), clinical concerns despite normal testing (=4) and screening for positive family history (=6). Subthemes include multiple comorbidities and mild abnormalities on cardiac tests.

CONCLUSIONS

We report categories of clinical questions that drive primary care provider cardiology eConsults. Multimorbidity leads to cardiology eConsults as primary care providers try to apply treatment guidelines in medically complex patients. Mild test abnormalities unrelated to clinical problems commonly lead to cardiology eConsult requests. Further research is needed to determine how guidelines can better account for multimorbidity, and how cardiologists can better communicate with primary care providers to put cardiac test results in clinical context.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过对基层医疗医生在心脏病电子会诊服务(eConsult)中提出的问题进行定性分析,探讨基层医疗医生转诊心脏病患者的决定因素。

背景

加拿大安大略省东部的一个健康区域,自2010年以来基层医疗服务提供者可使用电子会诊服务。

参与者

我们纳入了由我们电子会诊服务的注册基层医疗服务提供者用户发起的所有连续心脏病电子会诊,这些用户在2014年7月至2015年1月期间发起了一次或多次电子会诊。我们排除了基层医疗服务提供者未提问就附上文件的电子会诊。在排除14次电子会诊后,对由61名基层医疗服务提供者发起的100次连续电子会诊的便利样本进行了分析。根据定性分析的持续比较方法并经内容专家外部验证,将基层医疗服务提供者的电子会诊问题分类为主题类别。次要结果包括说明每个主题和任何新出现子主题的基层医疗服务提供者电子会诊问题样本。

结果

对30次电子会诊进行分析后出现了主题饱和。另外70次电子会诊编码后没有新出现的主题。主题包括临床指南的例外情况(=13)、心脏病患者的非心脏治疗(=13)、特定检查/管理(=18)、诊断测试结果解读(=46)、检查结果正常但仍存在临床担忧(=4)以及筛查阳性家族史(=6)。子主题包括多种合并症和心脏检查中的轻度异常。

结论

我们报告了驱动基层医疗服务提供者心脏病电子会诊的临床问题类别。由于基层医疗服务提供者试图在病情复杂的患者中应用治疗指南,合并症导致了心脏病电子会诊。与临床问题无关的轻度检查异常通常会导致心脏病电子会诊请求。需要进一步研究以确定指南如何能更好地考虑合并症,以及心脏病专家如何能更好地与基层医疗服务提供者沟通,以便将心脏检查结果置于临床背景中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cb5/6120168/e9cab61f67c4/10.1177_2055207618792140-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验