Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Dongguk University - Seoul, Goyang, Gyeonggi, South Korea.
J Texture Stud. 2018 Dec;49(6):653-658. doi: 10.1111/jtxs.12360. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
The flow behaviors of thickened water samples prepared with six commercial instant thickeners (A-F) were investigated at different thickness levels using the inexpensive, simple, and visual clinical tools, such as a line-spread test (LST) and a syringe flow test developed by the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI). Both the flow distance value measured by the LST and the volume remaining in syringe by IDDSI flow test were compared with the apparent viscosity (η ) values measured with a sophisticated computer-controlled rheometer. The η values of thickened water samples increased as thickener concentration increased, whereas the flow distance (cm; LST) or remaining volume (ml; IDDSI flow test) were decreased. Plots comparing η values to LST flow distances and IDDSI volumes revealed exponential relationships (R = 0.926 for the LST and R = 0.898 for IDDSI test) between the two measurements. Such lower determination coefficient (R ) values (0.898) by IDDSI flow test seems to be due to the stickiness characteristics of starch component in starch-based thickeners (E and F), indicating that the syringe flow test is not suitable for starch-based thickeners. However, the thickened water samples prepared only with xanthan gum (XG)-based thickeners (A-D) showed strong relationships (R = 0.972 for the LST and R = 0.939 for IDDSI test). These results suggest that the LST is a more reliable method than the IDDSI test for evaluating the correct and desirable viscosity for the dysphagia diet, and that the IDDSI test provides a means to predict the rheometer-measured viscosity of water thickened with only XG-based thickeners. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: The effective management of dysphagia requires the thickened fluids prepared with the correct and desirable viscosity. In terms of clinical practice, it is very important to observe the comparison of LST with IDDSI flow test to determine a suitable method for estimating the correct viscosity of thickened fluids. Our results showed good relationships between the rheometer-measured viscosity and flow values measured by the LST and IDDSI test methods for the thickened water samples prepared with different foods thickeners. The IDDSI flow test may be useful as a clinical training tool for preparing thickened fluids with only XG-based thickeners to a target level of viscosity. These results presented in this study will provide clinicians, caregivers, and patients with valuable information for IDDSI flow test as an inexpensive and simple method for measuring the correct viscosity.
使用六种商业即时增稠剂(A-F)制备的增稠水样的流变性在不同的稠度水平下使用廉价、简单和直观的临床工具进行了研究,如线扩散测试(LST)和国际吞咽障碍饮食标准化倡议(IDDSI)开发的注射器流动测试。LST 测量的流动距离值和 IDDSI 流动测试中剩余的注射器体积与使用复杂的计算机控制流变仪测量的表观粘度(η)值进行了比较。随着增稠剂浓度的增加,增稠水样的η值增加,而 LST 的流动距离(cm;LST)或 IDDSI 流动测试中的剩余体积(ml)减少。比较 η 值与 LST 流动距离和 IDDSI 体积的图揭示了两者之间的指数关系(LST 为 0.926,IDDSI 测试为 0.898)。IDDSI 流动测试的较低决定系数(R)值(0.898)似乎是由于淀粉基增稠剂(E 和 F)中淀粉成分的粘性特性所致,表明注射器流动测试不适合淀粉基增稠剂。然而,仅用黄原胶(XG)基增稠剂(A-D)制备的增稠水样品显示出较强的关系(LST 为 0.972,IDDSI 测试为 0.939)。这些结果表明,LST 是评估吞咽障碍饮食正确和理想粘度的更可靠方法,而 IDDSI 测试提供了一种预测仅用 XG 基增稠剂增稠的水的流变仪测量粘度的方法。实际应用:吞咽障碍的有效管理需要用正确和理想的粘度制备增稠液。在临床实践中,观察 LST 与 IDDSI 流动测试的比较非常重要,以确定一种合适的方法来估计增稠液的正确粘度。我们的结果表明,对于用不同食品增稠剂制备的增稠水样,流变仪测量的粘度与 LST 和 IDDSI 测试方法测量的流动值之间存在良好的关系。IDDSI 流动测试可作为一种临床训练工具,用于将仅用 XG 基增稠剂制备的增稠液制备到目标粘度水平。本研究结果为 IDDSI 流动测试作为一种廉价且简单的测量正确粘度的方法,为临床医生、护理人员和患者提供了有价值的信息。