Suppr超能文献

临床审计不起作用,质量改进会更好吗?

Clinical audit does not work, is quality improvement any better?

作者信息

Boyle Adrian, Keep Jeff

机构信息

Consultant Emergency Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB1 8RJ.

Consultant Emergency Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, King's College Hospital, London.

出版信息

Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2018 Sep 2;79(9):508-510. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2018.79.9.508.

Abstract

This article reviews the history of clinical audit and appraises its effectiveness. It discusses why audit can be ineffective in improving care and makes proposals to remove these barriers. The article describes how quality improvement and improvement science may offer a better alternative to traditional audit. It describes how the Royal College of Emergency Medicine is the first specialty society to attempt a national quality improvement programme.

摘要

本文回顾了临床审计的历史并评估了其有效性。它讨论了审计在改善医疗护理方面可能无效的原因,并提出了消除这些障碍的建议。文章描述了质量改进和改进科学如何可能为传统审计提供更好的替代方案。它描述了皇家急诊医学院是如何成为第一个尝试全国性质量改进计划的专业协会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验