Respiratory syncytial virus testing capabilities and practices among National Respiratory and Enteric Virus Surveillance System laboratories, United States, 2016.

BACKGROUND

Laboratory tests to detect respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vary in sensitivity and specificity. Diagnostic testing practices can impact RSV disease diagnosis and burden estimates.

OBJECTIVES

We surveyed a sample of laboratories that participated in the National Respiratory and Enteric Virus Surveillance System (NREVSS) in 2015-2016 to understand RSV testing, diagnostic capabilities, and practices.

STUDY DESIGN

We distributed surveys in fall 2016 to NREVSS laboratories using an internet survey platform. We conducted a descriptive analysis of survey responses and stratified results by self-identified children's hospital laboratories (CHL, i.e. laboratories affiliated with or in a children's hospital) or general hospital laboratories (GHL, i.e. laboratories that performed analysis on specimens from only adults or adults and children).

RESULTS

We sampled 367 (82.5%) of 445 eligible NREVSS laboratories with a 35.7% response rate; 11.5% (n = 15) were CHLs. All CHLs had PCR-based assay capability to test for RSV compared to 48.7% of GHLs (p < 0.001), and it was the most frequent method used by CHLs (n = 9, 75.0%). GHLs used rapid antigen detection tests most frequently (n = 65, 60.2%) to detect RSV compared to CHLs (p = 0.02, n = 3, 25.0%). Almost half (n = 41, 48.2%) of GHLs reported specimen submission from adults ≥50 years for RADTs.

CONCLUSIONS

Laboratory testing and diagnostic capabilities differed by whether laboratories self-identified as a CHL or GHL. Many GHLs reported use of RADTs in adults ≥50 years, a less sensitive diagnostic method for this population compared to PCR-based assays. RADT use in adults might miss RSV cases and affect diagnoses and disease burden estimates.