• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新生儿选择性静脉置管更换:一项随机试验。

Elective replacement of intravenous cannula in neonates-a randomised trial.

机构信息

Monash Newborn, Monash Children's Hospital, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC, 3168, Australia.

Hudson Institute of Medical Research, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC, 3168, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Nov;177(11):1719-1726. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3234-7. Epub 2018 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00431-018-3234-7
PMID:30191302
Abstract

Peripheral intravenous cannula (PIVC) insertion is one of the most common invasive procedures performed in neonates and is frequently associated with adverse events. There are no studies in the neonatal population looking at the possibility of reducing the risk of PIVC-related complications by elective replacement of PIVC. A randomised, non-blinded, control trial was conducted in a tertiary level neonatal unit in Melbourne, Australia, to examine rates of extravasation in neonates with elective replacement of PIVC as compared to standard practice. Neonates born at 32 weeks of gestation or more were randomly assigned to have their PIVC replaced electively (every 72-96 h) or when clinically indicated in a 1:1 allocation ratio after parental consent. Primary outcome studied was rate of extravasation. Secondary outcomes included rates of phlebitis, leakage or spontaneous dislodgement of PIVC. One hundred thirteen infants were enrolled. Extravasation was noted in 33 (60%) of standard practice group vs. 28 (48.3%) of elective replacement (RR 0.80, CI 0.57-1.13, p = 0.21) infants. Time to first extravasation was similar between the groups (hazard ratio 0.69, CI 0.42-1.15). Extravasation events per 1000 IV hours were also similar between groups. Similar results were seen by both intention to treat and per protocol analyses. There was an increase in leaking rates (HR1.98, CI 1.03-3.81, p = 0.04) in the elective group, while phlebitis and spontaneous dislodgement rates were similar to standard group.Conclusion: Elective replacement of PIVC in neonates is not associated with reduction in extravasation rates.Trial registration: This trial has been registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register. Identifier: ACTRN12615000827538. What is Known: • The reported incidence of extravasation injury is as high as 70% in the neonatal and paediatric population and has an association with cannula dwell time. • Adult studies have done to look at the possibility of reducing intravenous cannula-related complications with routine replacement of the cannulas but no similar studies have been done in the neonatal population. What is New: • Routine replacement of intravenous cannula in neonates between 72 and 96 h of use does not reduce the rate of extravasation injuries. • There might be some added complications associated with such a practice.

摘要

外周静脉置管 (PIVC) 插入是新生儿最常见的侵入性操作之一,常伴有不良事件。目前还没有研究关注通过选择性更换 PIVC 来降低与 PIVC 相关并发症的风险。本研究在澳大利亚墨尔本的一家三级新生儿病房进行了一项随机、非盲、对照试验,以检查在新生儿中选择性更换 PIVC 是否比标准实践更能降低外渗的发生率。胎龄 32 周或以上的新生儿在获得父母同意后,以 1:1 的比例随机分配到选择性更换 PIVC(每 72-96 小时)或根据临床指征更换 PIVC。主要研究结果是外渗发生率。次要结果包括静脉炎、渗漏或 PIVC 自发性脱落的发生率。共纳入 113 名婴儿。标准组外渗 33 例(60%),择期更换组 28 例(48.3%)(RR 0.80,CI 0.57-1.13,p=0.21)。两组首次外渗的时间相似(风险比 0.69,CI 0.42-1.15)。每 1000 小时静脉输液的外渗事件也相似。意向治疗和按方案分析均得出类似的结果。择期更换组漏液率升高(HR1.98,CI 1.03-3.81,p=0.04),而静脉炎和自发性脱落率与标准组相似。结论:新生儿选择性更换 PIVC 并不能降低外渗发生率。试验注册:本试验已在澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心注册。标识符:ACTRN12615000827538。已知:• 在新生儿和儿科人群中,外渗损伤的报告发生率高达 70%,且与导管留置时间有关。• 成人研究已经探讨了通过常规更换导管来降低与静脉导管相关的并发症的可能性,但在新生儿人群中尚未进行类似的研究。新发现:• 在新生儿使用静脉导管 72-96 小时之间进行常规更换不会降低外渗损伤的发生率。• 这种做法可能会带来一些额外的并发症。

相似文献

1
Elective replacement of intravenous cannula in neonates-a randomised trial.新生儿选择性静脉置管更换:一项随机试验。
Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Nov;177(11):1719-1726. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3234-7. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
2
Elective replacement of peripheral intravenous cannulas in neonates.新生儿外周静脉留置针的选择性更换
J Vasc Access. 2021 Jan;22(1):121-128. doi: 10.1177/1129729820927235. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
3
Integrated versus nOn-integrated Peripheral inTravenous catheter. Which Is the most effective systeM for peripheral intravenoUs catheter Management? (The OPTIMUM study): a randomised controlled trial protocol.集成式与非集成式外周静脉导管。哪种是外周静脉导管管理的最有效系统?(最佳研究):一项随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 May 14;8(5):e019916. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019916.
4
Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomised controlled equivalence trial.常规与临床指征外周静脉导管更换:一项随机对照等效试验。
Lancet. 2012 Sep 22;380(9847):1066-74. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61082-4.
5
The safety of clinically indicated replacement or routine replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: A randomized controlled study.临床指征更换与常规外周静脉留置导管更换的安全性:一项随机对照研究。
J Vasc Access. 2022 May;23(3):436-442. doi: 10.1177/1129729821998528. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
6
Peripheral intravenous cannulation: complication rates in the neonatal population: a multicenter observational study.外周静脉置管:新生儿群体中的并发症发生率:一项多中心观察性研究。
J Vasc Access. 2016 Jul 12;17(4):360-5. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000558. Epub 2016 May 31.
7
The RESPECT trial-Replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters according to clinical reasons or every 96 hours: A randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial.RESPECT 试验-根据临床原因或每 96 小时更换外周静脉导管:一项随机、对照、非劣效性试验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Jul;107:103504. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103504. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
8
Varied flushing frequency and volume to prevent peripheral intravenous catheter failure: a pilot, factorial randomised controlled trial in adult medical-surgical hospital patients.采用不同的冲洗频率和量预防外周静脉导管失功:一项针对成年内科-外科住院患者的先导性析因随机对照试验
Trials. 2016 Jul 26;17(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1470-6.
9
Routine resite of peripheral intravenous devices every 3 days did not reduce complications compared with clinically indicated resite: a randomised controlled trial.常规每 3 天更换外周静脉置管与根据临床指征更换相比并未减少并发症:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med. 2010 Sep 10;8:53. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-53.
10
Plastic in patient study: Prospective audit of adherence to peripheral intravenous cannula monitoring and documentation guidelines, with the aim of reducing future rates of intravenous cannula-related complications.患者研究中的塑料:对外周静脉留置针监测和记录指南依从性的前瞻性审计,旨在降低未来静脉留置针相关并发症的发生率。
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Jan 1;45(1):34-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of a care bundle on short peripheral catheter-associated complications in a resource-limited neonatal unit.护理包对资源有限的新生儿病房中短外周导管相关并发症的影响。
J Vasc Access. 2025 Jul;26(4):1355-1363. doi: 10.1177/11297298241278394. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
2
Functional Duration of Peripheral Intravenous Cannula in Neonates with or without Splint: A Randomized Controlled Trial.外周静脉留置针在有或无夹板新生儿中的功能持续时间:一项随机对照试验。
Indian J Pediatr. 2024 Aug;91(8):794-800. doi: 10.1007/s12098-023-04756-w. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
3
Securing peripheral intravenous catheters in babies without applying adhesive dressings to the skin: a proof-of-concept study.

本文引用的文献

1
Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Intention-to-treat versus per-protocol analysis.统计分析中的常见陷阱:意向性分析与符合方案分析。
Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Jul-Sep;7(3):144-6. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.184823.
2
Peripheral intravenous cannulation: complication rates in the neonatal population: a multicenter observational study.外周静脉置管:新生儿群体中的并发症发生率:一项多中心观察性研究。
J Vasc Access. 2016 Jul 12;17(4):360-5. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000558. Epub 2016 May 31.
3
Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters.
不使用皮肤 adhesive dressings 固定婴儿外周静脉导管:概念验证研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2022 May 18;22(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03345-8.
外周静脉导管的临床指征性更换与常规更换
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 14(8):CD007798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007798.pub4.
4
Vascular catheter-related complications in newborns.新生儿血管导管相关并发症
J Paediatr Child Health. 2012 Feb;48(2):E91-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2010.01934.x. Epub 2010 Dec 29.
5
Routine resite of peripheral intravenous devices every 3 days did not reduce complications compared with clinically indicated resite: a randomised controlled trial.常规每 3 天更换外周静脉置管与根据临床指征更换相比并未减少并发症:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med. 2010 Sep 10;8:53. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-53.
6
Peripheral IVs: factors affecting complications and patency--a randomized controlled trial.外周静脉输液:影响并发症和通畅性的因素——一项随机对照试验
J Infus Nurs. 2008 May-Jun;31(3):182-8. doi: 10.1097/01.NAN.0000317704.03415.b9.
7
A retrospective chart review of risk factors for extravasation among neonates receiving peripheral intravascular fluids.对接受外周血管内输液的新生儿渗出危险因素的回顾性病历审查。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2006 Mar-Apr;33(2):133-9. doi: 10.1097/00152192-200603000-00006.
8
Extravasation injuries on regional neonatal units.地区新生儿病房的外渗性损伤
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004 May;89(3):F274-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.028241.
9
Assessment of the infant with a peripheral intravenous device.对使用外周静脉装置的婴儿进行评估。
Adv Neonatal Care. 2003 Oct;3(5):230-40.
10
The safety and efficacy of peripheral intravenous catheters in ill neonates.外周静脉导管在患病新生儿中的安全性和有效性。
Neonatal Netw. 2001 Aug;20(5):33-8. doi: 10.1891/0730-0832.20.5.33.