Ross Ryan
Med Hist. 2018 Oct;62(4):449-467. doi: 10.1017/mdh.2018.42.
The increase in road traffic accidents in twentieth-century Britain brought with it a rise in the number of patients admitted to hospital with blunt, non-penetrating head injuries. Patients who had suffered mild to moderate trauma typically complained of a variety of problems, including headaches, dizziness and giddiness. For the neurologists tasked with diagnosing and treating these patients, such symptoms proved difficult to assess and liable to obscure the clinical picture. This article focuses on why neurologists turned to time as a diagnostic-tool in helping to resolve these issues, specifically the measurement of post-traumatic amnesia (PTA). This article argues that PTA became so central to neurological diagnosis owing to a set of epistemic, professional and material factors in the decades prior to the Second World War. It concludes with a call for deeper appreciation of the range of issues that contribute to the shaping of medical theories of head trauma.
20世纪英国道路交通事故的增加,导致因钝性、非穿透性头部受伤而住院的患者数量上升。遭受轻度至中度创伤的患者通常会抱怨出现各种问题,包括头痛、头晕和眩晕。对于负责诊断和治疗这些患者的神经科医生来说,这些症状很难评估,而且容易模糊临床症状。本文重点探讨神经科医生为何将时间作为一种诊断工具来帮助解决这些问题,特别是创伤后遗忘症(PTA)的测量。本文认为,由于第二次世界大战前几十年的一系列认知、专业和物质因素,PTA在神经学诊断中变得如此重要。文章最后呼吁更深入地认识到有助于形成头部创伤医学理论的一系列问题。