Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Stanford University Biostatistics, Stanford, California.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Oct 1;102(2):296-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.040. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
The radiobiology of prostate cancer may favor the extreme hypofractionation inherent in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT); however, data from a large multicenter study are lacking. We therefore examined the hypothesis that dose-escalated SBRT can be safely administered across multiple institutions, with favorable 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates compared with historical controls.
Twenty-one centers enrolled 309 patients with prostate adenocarcinoma: 172 with low-risk (LR) and 137 with intermediate-risk (IR) disease. All were treated with a non-coplanar robotic SBRT platform using real-time tracking of implanted fiducials. The prostate was prescribed 40 Gy in 5 fractions of 8 Gy. We assessed toxicities using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3 and biochemical failure using the "nadir + 2" definition. The study population yielded 90% power to identify excessive (>10%) rates of grade ≥3 genitourinary (GU) or gastrointestinal toxicities and, in the LR group, 80% power to show superiority in DFS over a 93% historical comparison rate.
At a median follow-up of 61 months, 2 LR patients (1.2%) and 2 IR patients (1.5%) experienced grade 3 GU toxicities, far below the 10% toxicity rate deemed excessive (upper limits of 95% confidence interval, 3.5% and 4.3%, respectively). No grade 4 or 5 toxicities occurred. All grade 3 toxicities were GU, occurring 11 to 51 months after treatment. For the entire group, the actuarial 5-year overall survival rate was 95.6% and the DFS rate was 97.1%. The 5-year DFS rate was 97.3% for LR patients (superior to the 93% DFS rate for historical controls; P = .0008; lower limit of 95% confidence interval, 94.6%) and 97.1% for IR patients.
Dose-escalated prostate SBRT was administered with minimal toxicity in this multi-institutional study. Relapse rates compared favorably with historical controls. SBRT is a suitable option for LR and IR prostate cancer.
前列腺癌的放射生物学可能有利于立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)固有的极端适形分割;然而,缺乏来自大型多中心研究的数据。因此,我们检验了以下假设:在多个机构中安全地给予剂量递增 SBRT,并与历史对照相比,具有良好的 5 年无疾病生存(DFS)率。
21 个中心共入组 309 例前列腺腺癌患者:172 例低危(LR)和 137 例中危(IR)患者。所有患者均采用实时跟踪植入基准点的非共面机器人 SBRT 平台进行治疗。前列腺接受 40 Gy 剂量分割 5 次,每次 8 Gy。我们使用不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)第 3 版评估毒性,使用“最低点+2”定义评估生化失败。研究人群具有 90%的效能来确定过高(>10%)的 3 级及以上泌尿生殖系(GU)或胃肠道毒性发生率,在 LR 组中,具有 80%的效能来显示 DFS 优于 93%的历史比较率。
中位随访 61 个月时,2 例 LR 患者(1.2%)和 2 例 IR 患者(1.5%)发生 3 级 GU 毒性,远低于 10%的毒性发生率(上限分别为 3.5%和 4.3%)。没有发生 4 级或 5 级毒性。所有 3 级毒性均为 GU,发生在治疗后 11 至 51 个月。对于整个队列,5 年总生存率为 95.6%,DFS 率为 97.1%。LR 患者的 5 年 DFS 率为 97.3%(优于历史对照的 93%DFS 率;P=0.0008;95%置信区间下限为 94.6%),IR 患者为 97.1%。
在这项多机构研究中,给予了递增剂量的前列腺 SBRT,毒性极小。复发率与历史对照相比具有优势。SBRT 是 LR 和 IR 前列腺癌的合适选择。