Berg Kristin M, Smith Stevens S, Piper Megan E, Fiore Michael C, Jorenby Douglas E
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin,
WMJ. 2018 Aug;117(3):111-115.
The progress achieved in reducing tobacco use has not been consistent across groups of smokers, and health systems are inconsistently implementing best practice guidelines. Guideline implementation could be associated with improved treatment invitation rates.
To evaluate differences in tobacco treatment invitation rates based on patient characteristics in primary care clinics implementing best practice guidelines.
A secondary analysis of patients presenting to 11 primary care clinics from 2 Wisconsin health systems from June 2010 to February 2013. The main outcome was whether patients received an invitation to participate in tobacco treatment. Invitation rates were examined by sex, age group (≤ 24 years, 25-44, 45-64, ≥ 64), race (white, black, other), insurance status (private, Medicare, Medicaid, none), and visit diagnosis ("high-risk" [cardiovascular and pulmonary disease, malignancy, pregnancy] vs "low-risk" [all other ICD-9 categories]). Moderation effects of health systems also were examined.
Of the 95,471 patients seen, 84,668 (89%) were screened for smoking. Among the 15,193 smokers, 10,242 (67%) were invited to participate. Invited patients were older, white or black, and carried low-risk diagnoses. Invitation rates and patient-level differences varied between the health systems.
Variable treatment invitation rates and health system differences remain evident in the primary care setting employing robust clinical practice guideline recommendations.
在减少烟草使用方面取得的进展在不同吸烟者群体中并不一致,而且卫生系统在实施最佳实践指南方面也不一致。指南的实施可能与提高治疗邀请率有关。
评估在实施最佳实践指南的基层医疗诊所中,基于患者特征的烟草治疗邀请率差异。
对2010年6月至2013年2月期间来自威斯康星州两个卫生系统的11家基层医疗诊所的患者进行二次分析。主要结果是患者是否收到参与烟草治疗的邀请。邀请率按性别、年龄组(≤24岁、25 - 44岁、45 - 64岁、≥64岁)、种族(白人、黑人、其他)、保险状况(私人保险、医疗保险、医疗补助、无保险)以及就诊诊断(“高风险”[心血管和肺部疾病、恶性肿瘤、妊娠]与“低风险”[所有其他ICD - 9类别])进行检查。还检查了卫生系统的调节作用。
在95471名就诊患者中,84668名(89%)接受了吸烟筛查。在15193名吸烟者中,10242名(67%)被邀请参与。被邀请的患者年龄较大,为白人或黑人,且诊断为低风险。两个卫生系统之间的邀请率和患者层面的差异有所不同。
在采用强有力的临床实践指南建议的基层医疗环境中,治疗邀请率的差异和卫生系统差异仍然明显。