Suppr超能文献

在有和没有导管的血液透析患者中进行的为期两年的血流感染率观察性研究。

Two-Year Observational Study of Bloodstream Infection Rates in Hemodialysis Facility Patients with and without Catheters.

机构信息

Divisions of Nephrology.

DaVita HealthCare Partners, Inc., Naugatuck, Connecticut.

出版信息

Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Sep 7;13(9):1381-1388. doi: 10.2215/CJN.13551217.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Bloodstream infection rates of patients on hemodialysis with catheters are greater than with other vascular accesses and are an important quality measure. Our goal was to compare relative bloodstream infection rates of patients with and without catheters as a quality parameter among the facilities providing hemodialysis.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We used CROWNWeb and National Healthcare Safety Network data from all 179 Medicare facilities providing adult outpatient hemodialysis in New England for >6 months throughout 2015-2016 (mean, 12,693 patients per month). There was a median of 60 (interquartile range, 43-93) patients per facility, with 17% having catheters.

RESULTS

Among the five batch-submitting dialysis organizations, the bloodstream infection rate in patients with a catheter in four organizations had adjusted risk ratios of 1.44 (95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 1.93) to 1.91 (95% confidence interval, 1.39 to 2.63) times relative to the reference dialysis provider group (<0.001). The percentage of catheters did not explain the difference in bloodstream infection rates among dialysis provider organizations. The bloodstream infection rates in patients with a catheter were negatively correlated with the facility's proportion of this patient group. Facilities with <10%, 10%-14.9%, 15%-19.9%, and ≥20% catheter patients had bloodstream infection rates of 4.4, 2.2, 1.9, and 1.5 per 100 patient-months, respectively, in that patient group (adjusted <0.001). This difference was not seen in patients without catheters. There was no effect of facility patient census or season of the year.

CONCLUSIONS

A study of the adult outpatient hemodialysis facilities in New England in 2015-2016 found that four dialysis provider groups had significantly higher bloodstream infection rates in patients with a catheter than the best-performing dialysis provider group. Hemodialysis facilities with lower proportions of patients with a catheter have significantly higher bloodstream infection rates in this patient group than facilities with >20% catheters, a finding that did not explain the difference among provider organizations.

摘要

背景与目的

导管相关血液感染率在接受血液透析的患者中高于其他血管通路,是一个重要的质量指标。我们的目标是比较有导管和无导管患者的相对血流感染率,作为提供血液透析的设施之间的质量参数。

设计、设置、参与者和测量:我们使用了 CROWNWeb 和 2015-2016 年新英格兰地区所有 179 家提供成人门诊血液透析的医疗保险设施的国家医疗保健安全网络数据(每月平均 12693 名患者)。中位数为每个设施 60 名(四分位距 43-93)患者,其中 17%有导管。

结果

在五个批量提交透析组织中,四个组织中有导管的患者的血流感染率的调整风险比为 1.44(95%置信区间 1.07 至 1.93)至 1.91(95%置信区间 1.39 至 2.63)倍,与参考透析提供者组相比(<0.001)。导管使用率并不能解释透析提供者组织之间血流感染率的差异。有导管患者的血流感染率与该患者群体在设施中的比例呈负相关。导管患者比例<10%、10%-14.9%、15%-19.9%和≥20%的设施,该患者群体的血流感染率分别为每 100 患者-月 4.4、2.2、1.9 和 1.5 次(调整后<0.001)。在没有导管的患者中没有观察到这种差异。设施患者人数或当年季节没有影响。

结论

对 2015-2016 年新英格兰地区成人门诊血液透析设施的研究发现,四个透析提供者群体在有导管的患者中的血流感染率明显高于表现最好的透析提供者群体。导管患者比例较低的血液透析设施在该患者群体中的血流感染率明显高于导管比例>20%的设施,这一发现并不能解释提供者组织之间的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e881/6140562/fcc2cc736a0d/CJN.13551217absf1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验