Viana Alonço, Zhao Chen, Rosa Talita, Couto Arnaldo, Neves Denise Duprat, Araújo-Melo Maria Helena, Capasso Robson
Program of Neurology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Marcílio Dias Naval Hospital (HNMD), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Laryngoscope. 2019 Feb;129(2):506-513. doi: 10.1002/lary.27298. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) has gained interest for upper airway evaluation in patients with snoring and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and different drugs have been used to induce sedation. Nevertheless, all drugs have presented specific advantages and disadvantages with differential effects on respiratory physiology. This study evaluated and compared the effects of midazolam, propofol and dexmedetomidine on DISE findings, O nadir, and bispectral index (BIS) in the same sample of patients.
Case series prospective study.
Consecutive patients who elected to undergo surgery for OSA treatment and were intolerant to conservative therapies underwent DISE with propofol, dexmedetomidine, and midazolam between July 2015 and July 2016.
Fifty-two patients were analyzed, and 43 (82.7%) were men. Agreement among drugs for both degree and patterns of obstruction was excellent at all sites (velum, oropharynx, and epiglottis) except for the tongue base. Dexmedetomidine had the least complete collapse sites and highest O nadir and was the only drug for which apnea severity and obstruction levels (upper, lower, or combined) were correlated. The variability among drug treatments for the BIS index was considerable, and propofol had the lowest variability and average value.
Drug selection had a relevant influence in DISE findings. Compared with dexmedetomidine, midazolam and propofol presented higher incidence of tongue base collapse, lower O levels, and lower BIS index values. Propofol resulted in an O nadir that most resembled that observed during polysomnography. The BIS index variability differed among drugs, and its use was considered relevant for sedation orientation.
4 Laryngoscope, 129:506-513, 2019.
药物诱导睡眠内镜检查(DISE)已引起人们对打鼾和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者上气道评估的关注,并且已使用不同药物来诱导镇静。然而,所有药物都有其特定的优缺点,对呼吸生理有不同的影响。本研究评估并比较了咪达唑仑、丙泊酚和右美托咪定对同一组患者的DISE检查结果、最低血氧饱和度(O nadir)和脑电双频指数(BIS)的影响。
病例系列前瞻性研究。
2015年7月至2016年7月期间,连续选择接受OSA手术治疗且不耐受保守治疗的患者,分别使用丙泊酚、右美托咪定和咪达唑仑进行DISE检查。
共分析了52例患者,其中43例(82.7%)为男性。除舌根外,在所有部位(软腭、口咽和会厌),不同药物在阻塞程度和模式方面的一致性都非常好。右美托咪定导致的完全塌陷部位最少,最低血氧饱和度最高,并且是唯一一种呼吸暂停严重程度与阻塞水平(上气道、下气道或联合)相关的药物。不同药物治疗的BIS指数变异性相当大,丙泊酚的变异性和平均值最低。
药物选择对DISE检查结果有显著影响。与右美托咪定相比,咪达唑仑和丙泊酚导致舌根塌陷的发生率更高,血氧水平更低,BIS指数值更低。丙泊酚导致的最低血氧饱和度与多导睡眠图观察到的最为相似。不同药物的BIS指数变异性不同,其应用被认为对镇静指导具有重要意义。
4 喉镜,129:506 - 513,2019年。