Kovatch Kevin J, Hanks John E, Stevens Jayne R, Stucken Chaz L
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.
Laryngoscope. 2019 Jan;129(1):138-145. doi: 10.1002/lary.27257. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Despite major advances in the field of head and neck microvascular free tissue transfer (MFTT) over the past several decades, there are no standardized perioperative regimens for the care of patients undergoing free flap reconstructive surgery, and continued variation in practice exists. This study aimed to report current trends in the field of MFTT performed by otolaryngologists, including surgeon training, institutional operative practices, and perioperative management.
Cross-sectional survey.
A survey of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited residency programs and American Head and Neck Society fellowship sites was conducted.
Seventy-one (62.8%) programs responded, with 67 (94.4%) routinely performing MFTT and 23 (32.4%) having a dedicated microvascular fellowship program. Of institutions performing MFTT, 66 (98.5%) reported the use of a two-surgeon team, most commonly both otolaryngologists (76.3%). Institutional MFTT volumes and donor site frequency are reported. Postoperative care includes routine admission to the intensive care unit (75.2%), step-down unit (15.0%), or general care floor (8.1%). Postoperative flap monitoring practices, including modalities, personnel, and timing/frequency show institutional variation. Despite differences in postoperative monitoring regimen and management (sedation, anticoagulation, antibiotic use), surgeon-reported measures of flap success rate (95.7%, standard deviation [SD] 4.7%) and complication rate (6.8%, SD 2.4%) show little difference across institutions.
Many elements of MFTT perioperative care show continued variation at an institutional level. There is a notable shift toward the two-team approach within otolaryngology. Self-reported flap complication and success rates showed no significant differences based on perioperative care and monitoring regimen. Further study of perioperative practices should focus on standardization of care to improve overall outcomes in this complex patient population.
NA Laryngoscope, 129:138-145, 2019.
目的/假设:尽管在过去几十年里头颈部微血管游离组织移植(MFTT)领域取得了重大进展,但对于接受游离皮瓣重建手术患者的围手术期护理,尚无标准化方案,且实际操作仍存在差异。本研究旨在报告耳鼻喉科医生开展的MFTT领域的当前趋势,包括外科医生培训、机构手术操作及围手术期管理。
横断面调查。
对毕业后医学教育认证委员会认证的住院医师培训项目和美国头颈外科学会的专科培训基地进行了一项调查。
71个(62.8%)项目做出了回应,其中67个(94.4%)常规开展MFTT,23个(32.4%)设有专门的微血管专科培训项目。在开展MFTT的机构中,66个(98.5%)报告采用双外科医生团队,最常见的是两名耳鼻喉科医生(76.3%)。报告了各机构的MFTT手术量及供区使用频率。术后护理包括常规入住重症监护病房(75.2%)、过渡病房(15.0%)或普通护理病房(8.1%)。术后皮瓣监测方法,包括监测方式、人员及时间/频率,各机构存在差异。尽管术后监测方案及管理(镇静、抗凝、抗生素使用)存在差异,但外科医生报告的皮瓣成功率(95.7%,标准差[SD]4.7%)和并发症发生率(6.8%,SD 2.4%)在各机构间差异不大。
MFTT围手术期护理的许多方面在机构层面仍存在差异。耳鼻喉科明显转向双团队模式。自我报告的皮瓣并发症和成功率在围手术期护理和监测方案方面无显著差异。围手术期实践的进一步研究应聚焦于护理标准化,以改善这类复杂患者群体的总体预后。
NA 《喉镜》,2019年,第129卷,第138 - 145页