The National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West (NIHR CLAHRC West) at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
The National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West (NIHR CLAHRC West) at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, UK; The National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Evaluation of Interventions, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK.
Health Place. 2018 Sep;53:237-257. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.07.012. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
There is increasing interest in the influence of place on health, and the need to distinguish between environmental and individual level factors. For environmental-level factors, current evidence tends to show associations through cross-sectional and uncontrolled longitudinal analyses rather than through more robust study designs that can provide stronger causal evidence. We restricted this systematic review to randomised (or cluster) randomised controlled trials and controlled before-and-after studies of changes to the built environment. Date of search was December 2016. We identified 14 studies. No evidence was found of an effect on mental health from 'urban regeneration' and 'improving green infrastructure' studies. Beneficial effects on quality-of-life outcomes from 'improving green infrastructure' were found in two studies. One 'improving green infrastructure' study reported an improvement in social isolation. Risk-of-bias assessment indicated robust data from only four studies. Overall, evidence for the impact of built environment interventions on mental health and quality-of-life is weak. Future research requires more robust study designs and interdisciplinary research involving public health, planning and urban design experts.
人们越来越关注地点对健康的影响,并且需要区分环境和个人层面的因素。对于环境层面的因素,目前的证据往往通过横断面和非对照性纵向分析来显示关联,而不是通过更稳健的研究设计来提供更强的因果证据。我们将这项系统评价限制在针对建筑环境变化的随机(或整群)随机对照试验和对照前后研究。搜索日期为 2016 年 12 月。我们确定了 14 项研究。没有证据表明“城市再生”和“改善绿色基础设施”研究对心理健康有影响。两项“改善绿色基础设施”的研究发现,其对生活质量结果有有益影响。一项“改善绿色基础设施”的研究报告称,社会隔离状况有所改善。偏倚风险评估表明,只有四项研究提供了可靠的数据。总体而言,建筑环境干预对心理健康和生活质量影响的证据是薄弱的。未来的研究需要更稳健的研究设计和涉及公共卫生、规划和城市设计专家的跨学科研究。