Schneider Andrew, Burr Rebecca, Garbis Nickolas, Salazar Dane
Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Loyola University Hospital System, 2160 South 1St Ave., Maywood, IL, 60153, USA.
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018 Dec;11(4):593-597. doi: 10.1007/s12178-018-9517-9.
The orthopedic community has seen a rapid rise in the clinical use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the management of shoulder pathologies over the past decade. The purpose of this paper is to review the current literature regarding the indications and outcomes of PRP for the surgical and non-surgical management of common shoulder pathologies, including rotator cuff tears.
Multiple studies have been published recently regarding the use of PRP for the operative and non-operative treatment of rotator cuff tears. There has been less research published on the use of PRP in the management of other conditions of the shoulder. Despite attempts to standardize and classify PRP formulations, there remains great variation in the inter- and intra-subjection composition, preparation, and administration techniques of PRP, limiting the conclusions that can be drawn regarding the utility and effectiveness of this biologic treatment as reported by Mazzocca et al. (J Bone Joint Surg Am. 94(4):308-16, 2012). Recent literature has shown equivocal to minor benefit of PRP use for shoulder pain, function, and healing. While few complications have been reported and PRP administration appears to carry little risk to the patient, the body of literature is currently inconclusive regarding the clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of PRP in the treatment of shoulder pathology. As for PRP use specifically as an adjunct to surgical rotator cuff repairs, there is no clear consensus on its effectiveness in either clinical or structural outcomes. To further delineate the efficacy of PRP for shoulder pathology, it is essential that more double-blinded, randomized controlled investigations with large sample sizes and standardized PRP preparations be performed.
在过去十年中,骨科领域中富血小板血浆(PRP)在肩部疾病治疗中的临床应用迅速增加。本文旨在综述当前关于PRP用于常见肩部疾病(包括肩袖撕裂)手术和非手术治疗的适应证及疗效的文献。
最近发表了多项关于PRP用于肩袖撕裂手术和非手术治疗的研究。关于PRP在其他肩部疾病治疗中的应用研究较少。尽管试图对PRP制剂进行标准化和分类,但PRP在受试者间和受试者内的成分、制备和给药技术仍存在很大差异,这限制了如Mazzocca等人(《美国骨与关节外科杂志》。94(4):308 - 16, 2012)所报道的关于这种生物治疗的效用和有效性所能得出的结论。最近的文献表明,PRP用于肩部疼痛缓解、功能改善和愈合的益处不明确或较小。虽然报道的并发症很少,且PRP给药对患者似乎风险很小,但目前关于PRP在肩部疾病治疗中的临床益处和成本效益的文献尚无定论。至于PRP专门用作肩袖修复手术的辅助手段,其在临床或结构结局方面的有效性尚无明确共识。为了进一步阐明PRP治疗肩部疾病的疗效,必须进行更多大样本量、标准化PRP制剂的双盲随机对照研究。