Suppr超能文献

在新鲜和冷冻体外受精周期中,携带低质量胚胎和高质量胚胎对结局的影响。

Effect of transfer of a poor quality embryo along with a top quality embryo on the outcome during fresh and frozen in vitro fertilization cycles.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, United Kingdom.

ASTRA Fertility Clinic, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2018 Sep;110(4):655-660. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.010.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of a poor quality embryo (PQE) during double ET (DET) with a top quality embryo (TQE) on IVF outcome.

DESIGN

A review of prospectively collected data.

SETTING

Tertiary level fertility clinic.

PATIENT(S): All patients undergoing blastocyst transfers as part of fresh IVF (n = 939) and frozen ET (n = 1,009) cycles performed between 2010 and 2016.

INTERVENTION(S): Single ET (SET) with TQE (group 1) was set as control and compared with outcomes for SET with PQE (group 2), DET with 2 TQEs (group 3), PQE plus TQE (group 4), and 2 PQE (group 5).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Live births and multiple births.

RESULT(S): The live birth rates for group 4 were statistically similar to group 1 during fresh IVF (26.5% vs. 33.7%; odds ratio [OR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-1.7) and frozen ET (24.2% vs. 32.7%; OR, 0.75; 95% CI 0.48-1.2), although there was a trend for lower success. Conversely, multiple births were higher in group 4 for fresh IVF (19% vs. 4.7%; OR, 2.9; 95% CI 1.3-6.6) and frozen ET (10.3% vs. 2.6%; OR, 2.4; 95% CI 1.2-4.9). The live birth rates for group 2 (12.2% for fresh IVF and 14.6% for frozen ET) and group 5 (21.2% for fresh IVF and 14% for frozen ET) were lower and for group 3 were higher (40.8% for fresh IVF and 40.3% for frozen ET) when compared with group 1. Multiple births were significantly higher with DET.

CONCLUSION(S): This study does not support DET with one PQE along with a TQE, when there is only one TQE and one or more PQEs available for fresh IVF or frozen ET.

摘要

目的

评估在双胚胎移植(DET)中使用一个优质胚胎(TQE)和一个质量较差的胚胎(PQE)对体外受精结局的影响。

设计

前瞻性收集数据的回顾性研究。

地点

三级生育诊所。

患者

2010 年至 2016 年期间接受囊胚移植的所有新鲜体外受精(IVF)(n=939)和冷冻胚胎移植(ET)(n=1009)周期的患者。

干预

单胚胎移植(SET)使用 TQE(第 1 组)作为对照,并与 SET 使用 PQE(第 2 组)、DET 使用 2 个 TQEs(第 3 组)、PQE 加 TQE(第 4 组)和 2 个 PQE(第 5 组)的结果进行比较。

主要观察指标

活产率和多胎率。

结果

第 4 组的活产率在新鲜 IVF 时与第 1 组统计学相似(26.5%比 33.7%;优势比[OR],0.95;95%置信区间[CI],0.53-1.7)和冷冻 ET(24.2%比 32.7%;OR,0.75;95%CI,0.48-1.2),尽管有较低成功率的趋势。相反,第 4 组新鲜 IVF(19%比 4.7%;OR,2.9;95%CI,1.3-6.6)和冷冻 ET(10.3%比 2.6%;OR,2.4;95%CI,1.2-4.9)的多胎率更高。第 2 组(新鲜 IVF 为 12.2%,冷冻 ET 为 14.6%)和第 5 组(新鲜 IVF 为 21.2%,冷冻 ET 为 14%)的活产率较低,而第 3 组(新鲜 IVF 为 40.8%,冷冻 ET 为 40.3%)的活产率较高。多胎妊娠在 DET 时显著升高。

结论

当新鲜 IVF 或冷冻 ET 只有一个 TQE 和一个或多个 PQEs 可用时,本研究不支持 DET 中使用一个 PQE 加上一个 TQE。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验