• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冻融胚胎移植中使用质量差的胚胎和质量好的胚胎对妊娠和新生儿结局的影响。

Effect of frozen-thawed embryo transfer with a poor-quality embryo and a good-quality embryo on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, P. R. China.

出版信息

Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024 Feb 21;22(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01194-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12958-024-01194-x
PMID:38383391
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10880350/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the impact of embryo quality and quantity, specifically a poor quality embryo (PQE) in combination with a good quality embryo (GQE), by double embryo transfer (DET) on the live birth rate (LBR) and neonatal outcomes in patients undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles.

METHODS

A study on a cohort of women who underwent a total of 1462 frozen-thawed cleavage or blastocyst embryo transfer cycles with autologous oocytes was conducted between January 2018 and December 2021. To compare the outcomes between single embryo transfer (SET) with a GQE and DET with a GQE and a PQE, propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to control for potential confounders, and a generalized estimating equation (GEE) model was used to determine the association between the effect of an additional PQE and the outcomes. Subgroup analysis was also performed for patients stratified by female age.

RESULTS

After PS matching, DET-GQE + PQE did not significantly alter the LBR (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.421, 95% CI 0.907-2.228) compared with SET-GQE in cleavage-stage embryo transfer but did increase the multiple birth rate (MBR, [OR] 3.917, 95% CI 1.189-12.911). However, in patients who underwent blastocyst-stage embryo transfer, adding a second PQE increased the live birth rate by 7.8% ([OR] 1.477, 95% CI 1.046-2.086) and the multiple birth rate by 19.6% ([OR] 28.355, 95% CI 3.926-204.790), and resulted in adverse neonatal outcomes. For patients who underwent cleavage-stage embryo transfer, transferring a PQE with a GQE led to a significant increase in the MBR ([OR] 4.724, 95% CI 1.121-19.913) in women under 35 years old but not in the LBR ([OR] 1.227, 95% CI 0.719-2.092). The increases in LBR and MBR for DET-GQE + PQE compared with SET-GQE in women older than 35 years were nonsignificant toward. For patients who underwent blastocyst-stage embryo transfer, DET-GQE + PQE had a greater LBR ([OR] 1.803, 95% CI 1.165-2.789), MBR ([OR] 24.185, 95% CI 3.285-178.062) and preterm birth rate (PBR, [OR] 4.092, 95% CI 1.153-14.518) than did SET-GQE in women under 35 years old, while no significant impact on the LBR ([OR] 1.053, 95% CI 0.589-1.884) or MBR (0% vs. 8.3%) was observed in women older than 35 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of a PQE has no significant benefit on the LBR but significantly increases the MBR in patients who underwent frozen-thawed cleavage-stage embryo transfer. However, for patients who underwent blastocyst-stage embryo transfer, DET-GQE + PQE resulted in an increase in both the LBR and MBR, which may lead to adverse neonatal outcomes. Thus, the benefits and risks of double blastocyst-stage embryo transfer should be balanced. In patients younger than 35 years, SET-GQE achieved satisfactory LBR either in cleavage-stage embryo transfer or blastocyst-stage embryo transfer, while DET-GQE + PQE resulted in a dramatically increased MBR. Considering the low LBR in women older than 35 years who underwent single cleavage-stage embryo transfer, selective single blastocyst-stage embryo transfer appears to be a more promising approach for reducing the risk of multiple live births and adverse neonatal outcomes.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估胚胎质量和数量的影响,特别是通过双胚胎移植(DET)将一个质量差的胚胎(PQE)与一个质量好的胚胎(GQE)结合使用,对接受冻融胚胎移植(FET)周期的患者的活产率(LBR)和新生儿结局的影响。

方法

对 2018 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间接受了总共 1462 个自体卵子冻融卵裂期或囊胚胚胎移植周期的女性患者进行了一项研究。为了比较单胚胎移植(SET)与 GQE 和 DET 与 GQE 和 PQE 的结果,应用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来控制潜在的混杂因素,并使用广义估计方程(GEE)模型来确定额外 PQE 的效果与结果之间的关联。还对按女性年龄分层的患者进行了亚组分析。

结果

在 PS 匹配后,与 SET-GQE 相比,DET-GQE+PQE 并未显著改变卵裂期胚胎移植的 LBR(调整后的优势比 [OR] 1.421,95%CI 0.907-2.228),但增加了多胎妊娠率(MBR,[OR] 3.917,95%CI 1.189-12.911)。然而,在接受囊胚期胚胎移植的患者中,添加第二个 PQE 可使活产率提高 7.8%([OR] 1.477,95%CI 1.046-2.086)和多胎妊娠率提高 19.6%([OR] 28.355,95%CI 3.926-204.790),并导致不良新生儿结局。对于接受卵裂期胚胎移植的患者,携带 GQE 的 PQE 会导致 35 岁以下女性的 MBR 显著增加([OR] 4.724,95%CI 1.121-19.913),但 LBR 无显著增加([OR] 1.227,95%CI 0.719-2.092)。对于年龄大于 35 岁的患者,与 SET-GQE 相比,DET-GQE+PQE 并未显著增加 LBR 和 MBR。对于接受囊胚期胚胎移植的患者,DET-GQE+PQE 与 SET-GQE 相比,LBR([OR] 1.803,95%CI 1.165-2.789)、MBR([OR] 24.185,95%CI 3.285-178.062)和早产率(PBR,[OR] 4.092,95%CI 1.153-14.518)更高,而 LBR([OR] 1.053,95%CI 0.589-1.884)和 MBR(0%比 8.3%)无显著变化。

结论

在接受冻融卵裂期胚胎移植的患者中,添加 PQE 对 LBR 无显著益处,但显著增加了 MBR。然而,对于接受囊胚期胚胎移植的患者,DET-GQE+PQE 导致 LBR 和 MBR 均增加,这可能导致不良新生儿结局。因此,应该权衡双囊胚期胚胎移植的益处和风险。对于年龄小于 35 岁的患者,SET-GQE 无论是在卵裂期胚胎移植还是囊胚期胚胎移植中,均能获得满意的 LBR,而 DET-GQE+PQE 则导致 MBR 显著增加。考虑到年龄大于 35 岁的患者单卵裂期胚胎移植的 LBR 较低,选择性单囊胚期胚胎移植似乎是降低多胎活产和不良新生儿结局风险的更有前途的方法。

相似文献

1
Effect of frozen-thawed embryo transfer with a poor-quality embryo and a good-quality embryo on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.冻融胚胎移植中使用质量差的胚胎和质量好的胚胎对妊娠和新生儿结局的影响。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024 Feb 21;22(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01194-x.
2
The Association Between Embryo Quality, Number of Transferred Embryos and Live Birth Rate After Vitrified Cleavage-Stage Embryos and Blastocyst Transfer.玻璃化卵裂期胚胎和囊胚移植后胚胎质量、移植胚胎数量与活产率之间的关联
Front Physiol. 2020 Aug 14;11:930. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00930. eCollection 2020.
3
Does the transfer of a poor quality embryo with a good quality embryo benefit poor prognosis patients?将质量差的胚胎与质量好的胚胎进行转移,对预后较差的患者是否有益?
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020 Sep 30;18(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12958-020-00656-2.
4
Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection.体外受精或卵胞浆内单精子注射后移植的胚胎数量。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 21;8(8):CD003416. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003416.pub5.
5
Transfer of a poor-quality along with a good-quality embryo on in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射-胚胎移植临床结局中同时移植质量差和质量好的胚胎:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Fertil Steril. 2022 Dec;118(6):1066-1079. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.848. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
6
Extended culture of poor-quality supernumerary embryos improves ART outcomes.延长劣质多余胚胎的培养时间可提高辅助生殖技术的治疗结局。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Feb;35(2):311-319. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-1063-7. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
7
Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection.体外受精或卵胞浆内单精子注射后移植的胚胎数量。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 29;2013(7):CD003416. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003416.pub4.
8
Adding a low-quality blastocyst to a high-quality blastocyst for a double embryo transfer does not decrease pregnancy and live birth rate.将低质量的囊胚添加到高质量的囊胚中进行双胚胎移植不会降低妊娠率和活产率。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Jun;100(6):1124-1131. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14088. Epub 2021 Feb 7.
9
Comparisons of benefits and risks of single embryo transfer versus double embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单胚胎移植与双胚胎移植的利弊比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2022 Jan 27;20(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12958-022-00899-1.
10
Clinical outcomes after single-versus double-embryo transfers in women with adenomyosis: a retrospective study.腺肌症患者行单胚胎移植与双胚胎移植的临床结局:一项回顾性研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Jul;304(1):263-270. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05924-5. Epub 2021 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Retrospective cohort study on cumulative live birth rate of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection after multiple complete cycles in patients with diminished ovarian reserve.卵巢储备功能减退患者多次完整周期体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射后累积活产率的回顾性队列研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jul 12;25(1):755. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07839-y.
2
Effects of Various Transfer Strategies of Frozen-Thawed Cleavage-Stage and Blastocyst Embryos on Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes in Different Age Groups.不同年龄组中冻融卵裂期胚胎和囊胚的各种移植策略对妊娠及新生儿结局的影响
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Apr 25;18:2319-2334. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S502766. eCollection 2025.
3
Effects of different embryonic development days on clinical outcomes of freeze-thawed embryo transfer.不同胚胎发育天数对冻融胚胎移植临床结局的影响。
Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Apr;41(4):1087-1091. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.4.9634.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictive value of D-dimer in patients with unexplained recurrent implantation failure during freeze-thaw embryo transfer cycles.冻融胚胎移植周期中不明原因反复着床失败患者 D-二聚体的预测价值。
Am J Reprod Immunol. 2023 Jul;90(1):e13710. doi: 10.1111/aji.13710. Epub 2023 May 3.
2
Transfer of a poor-quality along with a good-quality embryo on in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射-胚胎移植临床结局中同时移植质量差和质量好的胚胎:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Fertil Steril. 2022 Dec;118(6):1066-1079. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.848. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
3
Clinical outcomes after elective double-embryo transfer in frozen cycles for women of advanced maternal age: A retrospective cohort study.高龄妇女冻融周期选择性双胚胎移植的临床结局:回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Mar 4;101(9):e28992. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028992.
4
Comparisons of benefits and risks of single embryo transfer versus double embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单胚胎移植与双胚胎移植的利弊比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2022 Jan 27;20(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12958-022-00899-1.
5
Guidance on the limits to the number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion.关于移植胚胎数量限制的指南:委员会意见。
Fertil Steril. 2021 Sep;116(3):651-654. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.06.050. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
6
Current evidence supporting a goal of singletons: a review of maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with twin versus singleton pregnancies after in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.目前支持单胎妊娠目标的证据:体外受精和胞浆内单精子注射后双胎与单胎妊娠相关的母婴围产结局的综述。
Fertil Steril. 2020 Oct;114(4):690-714. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.1423.
7
Does the transfer of a poor quality embryo with a good quality embryo benefit poor prognosis patients?将质量差的胚胎与质量好的胚胎进行转移,对预后较差的患者是否有益?
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020 Sep 30;18(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12958-020-00656-2.
8
The Association Between Embryo Quality, Number of Transferred Embryos and Live Birth Rate After Vitrified Cleavage-Stage Embryos and Blastocyst Transfer.玻璃化卵裂期胚胎和囊胚移植后胚胎质量、移植胚胎数量与活产率之间的关联
Front Physiol. 2020 Aug 14;11:930. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00930. eCollection 2020.
9
Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection.体外受精或卵胞浆内单精子注射后移植的胚胎数量。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 21;8(8):CD003416. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003416.pub5.
10
Impact of Transferring a Poor Quality Embryo Along with a Good Quality Embryo on Pregnancy Outcomes in IVF/ICSI Cycles: a Retrospective Study.在体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射周期中,移植一枚质量差的胚胎与一枚质量好的胚胎对妊娠结局的影响:一项回顾性研究
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2020 Aug;80(8):844-850. doi: 10.1055/a-1213-9164. Epub 2020 Aug 14.