Department of Mathematics, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Department of Global Biostatistics and Data Science, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University New, Orleans, LA, USA.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Oct-Nov;28(10-11):3123-3141. doi: 10.1177/0962280218796253. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
Excessive zeros are common in practice and may cause overdispersion and invalidate inferences when fitting Poisson regression models. Zero-inflated Poisson regression models may be applied if there are inflated zeros; however, it is desirable to test if there are inflated zeros before such zero-inflated Poisson models are applied. Assuming a constant probability of being a structural zero in a zero-inflated Poisson regression model, the existence of the inflated zeros may be tested by testing whether the constant probability is zero. In such situations, the Wald, score, and likelihood ratio tests can be applied. Without specifying a zero-inflated Poisson model, He et al. recently developed a test by comparing the amount of observed zeros with that expected under the Poisson model. In this paper, we develop a closed form for the test and compare it with the Wald, score, and likelihood ratio tests through simulation studies. The simulation studies show that the test of He et al. is the best in controlling type I errors, while the score test generally has the least power among the tests. The tests are illustrated with two real data examples.
过度的零值在实践中很常见,如果在拟合泊松回归模型时出现零膨胀,可能会导致过度离散和推断无效。如果存在膨胀的零值,可以应用零膨胀泊松回归模型;但是,在应用此类零膨胀泊松模型之前,最好先测试是否存在膨胀的零值。在零膨胀泊松回归模型中,假设结构零的存在概率是常数,那么可以通过检验这个常数概率是否为零来检验是否存在膨胀的零值。在这种情况下,可以应用 Wald、Score 和似然比检验。最近,He 等人在没有指定零膨胀泊松模型的情况下,通过比较观测到的零值与泊松模型下的预期零值,开发了一种检验方法。在本文中,我们提出了该检验的闭式解,并通过模拟研究将其与 Wald、Score 和似然比检验进行了比较。模拟研究表明,He 等人的检验在控制 I 型错误方面表现最好,而 Score 检验在这些检验中通常具有最低的功效。我们通过两个真实数据示例说明了这些检验。