Pottinger Heidi L, Rahlin Mary, Voigt Jessiemarie, Walsh Michele E, Fregosi Charlene M, Duncan Burris R
Department of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona , Tucson, AZ, USA.
Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Professions, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science , North Chicago, IL, USA.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2020 Sep;36(9):973-988. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1517847. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
The purpose of this pilot study was (1) to evaluate feasibility of attendance and parent satisfaction with an intensive outpatient physical and occupational therapy program for young children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP) and (2) to examine changes in motor function. : Sixteen children with CP, age range 18-36 months (mean 24.3 ± 6.3 months), received physical and occupational therapy sessions (30 minutes each) 5 days per week for 12 weeks. Attendance rates and parent satisfaction were assessed. Change in motor function using a one-group pre-post design was evaluated using the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66), Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test, and Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. GMFM-66 outcomes were also compared with expected outcomes using previously published normative developmental trajectories of children receiving standard therapies. : An average of 82% of scheduled outpatient physical and occupational therapies for 16 children were completed and the 11 parents who completed the Hills and Kitchen's Physiotherapy Outpatient Satisfaction Questionnaire were satisfied with the therapies and with their child's progress. Participants showed notable, statistically significant improvement across all activity-related measures. : An intensive protocol of outpatient therapies utilizing Perception-Action Approach was feasible for most families of young children with spastic CP to attend at the outpatient clinic location. As this was not an experimental study, no reliable conclusions related to efficacy can be made, but the promising results suggest that further research into the effectiveness of intensive protocols is worthwhile.
(1)评估针对痉挛型脑瘫(CP)幼儿的强化门诊物理治疗和职业治疗项目的参与可行性及家长满意度;(2)检查运动功能的变化。16名年龄在18至36个月(平均24.3±6.3个月)的CP患儿,每周5天,每天接受物理治疗和职业治疗各30分钟,共持续12周。评估了出勤率和家长满意度。采用单组前后设计,使用粗大运动功能测量量表-66(GMFM-66)、上肢技能质量测试和儿童残疾评估量表评估运动功能的变化。GMFM-66的结果还与使用先前发表的接受标准治疗儿童的规范性发育轨迹得出的预期结果进行了比较。16名儿童平均完成了82%预定的门诊物理治疗和职业治疗,11名完成希尔斯和基钦物理治疗门诊满意度问卷的家长对治疗及其孩子的进展感到满意。参与者在所有与活动相关的测量指标上均有显著的、具有统计学意义的改善。对于大多数痉挛型CP幼儿家庭来说,在门诊诊所地点采用感知-行动方法的强化门诊治疗方案是可行的。由于这不是一项实验性研究,无法得出与疗效相关的可靠结论,但这些有前景的结果表明,对强化治疗方案的有效性进行进一步研究是值得的。