• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“我永远都不会想要这样”:一项针对髋部骨折住院患者及其照护者对肠内管饲喂养看法的定性评估。

"I Wouldn't Ever Want It": A Qualitative Evaluation of Patient and Caregiver Perceptions Toward Enteral Tube Feeding in Hip Fracture Inpatients.

机构信息

School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Orthogeriatric Unit, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2019 May;43(4):526-533. doi: 10.1002/jpen.1444. Epub 2018 Sep 10.

DOI:10.1002/jpen.1444
PMID:30199088
Abstract

BACKGROUND

One in 2 hip fracture inpatients are malnourished on admission to hospital, with many experiencing nutrition decline during their length of stay. Despite this, enteral tube feeding (ETF) is rarely used in this population. As patient/caregiver viewpoints regarding the utility of ETF remain unclear, this study explored the perceptions of hip fracture inpatients and caregivers toward ETF use to assist recovery.

METHODS

An inductive qualitative research project was conducted within a tertiary hospital orthogeriatric ward. Individual semistructured interviews were undertaken with 13 purposively sampled, postsurgery hip fracture inpatients and 7 caregivers. Interviews were transcribed, hard-copy coded, and thematically analyzed.

RESULTS

The majority of inpatient participants did not wish to be tube fed. A novel, complex interrelationship of the following 3 main themes emerged: knowledge and understanding, perceived consequences and necessity of tube, contributed toward potential ETF acceptance and refusal. Theme interrelationship was indicated by subthemes (nutrition importance, attitude, and ability to cope) and driven by the following 3 key categories: value of nutrition, quality of life, and personal perception.

CONCLUSION

A number of factors impacted the likelihood of tube acceptance. This highlights the importance of food as a medicine, treatment intent, and shared decision making when considering ETF in acute hip fracture inpatients.

摘要

背景

每两个髋部骨折住院患者中就有一个在入院时存在营养不良,许多患者在住院期间会出现营养状况恶化。尽管如此,该人群中很少使用肠内管饲(ETF)。由于患者/照护者对 ETF 效用的看法仍不清楚,本研究旨在探讨髋部骨折住院患者和照护者对 ETF 使用以辅助康复的看法。

方法

在一家三级医院骨科病房进行了一项归纳性定性研究项目。对 13 名接受过择期髋部手术后的住院患者和 7 名照护者进行了有针对性抽样的半结构式访谈。访谈记录被转录为文字,然后进行硬拷贝编码和主题分析。

结果

大多数住院患者都不想接受管饲。出现了以下 3 个主要主题的新的、复杂的相互关系:知识和理解、对管饲的感知后果和必要性,这些都促成了潜在的 ETF 接受和拒绝。主题之间的相互关系由子主题(营养重要性、态度和应对能力)表示,并由以下 3 个关键类别驱动:营养的价值、生活质量和个人认知。

结论

许多因素影响着接受管饲的可能性。这突出了将食物作为药物、治疗意图以及在考虑急性髋部骨折住院患者使用 ETF 时进行共同决策的重要性。

相似文献

1
"I Wouldn't Ever Want It": A Qualitative Evaluation of Patient and Caregiver Perceptions Toward Enteral Tube Feeding in Hip Fracture Inpatients.“我永远都不会想要这样”:一项针对髋部骨折住院患者及其照护者对肠内管饲喂养看法的定性评估。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2019 May;43(4):526-533. doi: 10.1002/jpen.1444. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
2
Development of an 'Enteral tube feeding decision support tool' for hip fracture patients: A modified Delphi approach.髋部骨折患者“肠内管饲决策支持工具”的开发:一种改良的德尔菲法。
Australas J Ageing. 2018 Sep;37(3):217-223. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12575.
3
Caregiver Preference for Tube Feeding in Community-Dwelling Persons with Severe Dementia.社区居住的重度痴呆患者管饲喂养的照顾者偏好。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Oct;68(10):2264-2269. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16641. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
4
Why Don't We Tube Feed Hip Fracture Patients? Findings from the Implementation of an Enteral Tube Feeding Decision Support Tool.我们为何不为髋部骨折患者进行管饲?肠内管饲决策支持工具实施的结果
Geriatrics (Basel). 2021 Feb 2;6(1):12. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics6010012.
5
A descriptive study of nasogastric tube feeding among geriatric inpatients in Malaysia: utilization, complications, and caregiver opinions.马来西亚老年住院患者鼻饲管喂养的描述性研究:使用情况、并发症及护理人员的意见
J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr. 2015;34(1):34-49. doi: 10.1080/21551197.2014.998326.
6
Parent, patient and health professional perspectives regarding enteral nutrition in paediatric oncology.儿科肿瘤患者、家长和医护人员对肠内营养的观点。
Nutr Diet. 2017 Nov;74(5):476-487. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12336. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
7
Multidisciplinary, multi-modal nutritional care in acute hip fracture inpatients - results of a pragmatic intervention.多学科、多模式营养护理在急性髋部骨折住院患者中的应用 - 一项实用干预的结果。
Clin Nutr. 2014 Dec;33(6):1101-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.12.003. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
8
People with enteral tubes and their carers' views of living with a tube and managing associated problems: A qualitative interview study.有肠内管的患者及其照顾者对带管生活和处理相关问题的看法:一项定性访谈研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Oct;28(19-20):3710-3720. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14972. Epub 2019 Jul 14.
9
The experiences and support needs of people living at home with an enteral tube: a qualitative interview study.居家带管人群的经历和支持需求:一项定性访谈研究。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2019 Oct;32(5):646-658. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12656. Epub 2019 Apr 21.
10
Health care professionals' perceptions and experience of initiating different modalities for home enteral feeding.医疗保健专业人员对启动不同家庭肠内喂养方式的看法和经验。
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2019 Apr;30:67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences and needs of home caregivers for enteral nutrition: A systematic review of qualitative research.居家照护者肠内营养体验和需求的定性研究系统评价
Nurs Open. 2022 Jan;9(1):11-21. doi: 10.1002/nop2.990. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
2
Cancer cachexia in adult patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines.成人癌症恶病质:ESMO 临床实践指南。
ESMO Open. 2021 Jun;6(3):100092. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100092.
3
Why Don't We Tube Feed Hip Fracture Patients? Findings from the Implementation of an Enteral Tube Feeding Decision Support Tool.
我们为何不为髋部骨折患者进行管饲?肠内管饲决策支持工具实施的结果
Geriatrics (Basel). 2021 Feb 2;6(1):12. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics6010012.
4
Specific Quality of Life Assessment by the NutriQoL® Questionnaire Among Patients Receiving Home Enteral Nutrition.NutriQoL® 问卷对接受家庭肠内营养患者的特定生活质量评估。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2021 Mar;45(3):490-498. doi: 10.1002/jpen.1852. Epub 2020 May 27.