Woratanarat Patarawan, Lorungroj Khongchai, Dechosilpa Chayanee, Jaovisidha Suphaneewan, Danpakdeekul Nattaporn, Woratanarat Thira, Thakkinstian Ammarin
Departments of Orthopaedics.
Radiology.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Nov/Dec;38(10):e577-e583. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001252.
The standard evaluation of epiphyseal involvement in Perthes disease is lateral pillar classification. However, it needs to be compared with contralateral normal hip leading to limited use in bilateral disease. We, therefore, develop a ratio between epiphyseal height and metaphyseal width of affected hips to estimate lateral pillar involvement. This study aimed to assess the height-width ratio of the proximal femoral epiphysis in non-Perthes children, and to find the relationship between the height-width ratio and lateral pillar classification in Perthes disease.
A cross-sectional study was conducted between 2009 and 2015. Phase I included children aged 2 to 15 years who did not have Perthes disease. Phase II included children aged 2 to 15 years who had Perthes disease. Other abnormal proximal femoral epiphysis was excluded. Lateral pillar height and metaphyseal width were independently measured twice by 2 assessors in each phase. Intraobserver and interobserver levels of agreement, height-width ratio and cut-off points to differentiate lateral pillar types were determined.
There were 69 children (87 hip radiographs) who had non-Perthes hips, and 18 boys with Perthes disease (20 hip radiographs). Height-width ratio in the non-Perthes group increased from 0.38 to 0.48 at 2 to 10 years of age and remained constant until maturity. Average height-width ratio in lateral pillar A/non-Perthes hip was 0.47±0.05, lateral pillar B or B/C 0.32±0.05, and lateral pillar C 0.18±0.05. Intraobserver and interobserver level of agreements of height-width ratio in Perthes disease were 0.007 (95% confidence interval, -0.030 to 0.043) and 0.006 (95% confidence interval, -0.119 to 0.107), respectively. Cut-off values to differentiate lateral pillar A and B or B/C was 0.40, and to differentiate lateral pillar B or B/C, and C was 0.25 with 90% accuracy and area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.9.
Height-width ratio is useful for grading severity in unilateral and bilateral Perthes disease. It has excellent reliability and validity with exact cutoff values to estimate lateral pillar classification.
Level II-diagnostic study.
佩特兹病骨骺受累情况的标准评估方法是外侧柱分类。然而,该方法需要与对侧正常髋关节进行比较,这使得其在双侧疾病中的应用受限。因此,我们提出一种患侧髋关节骨骺高度与干骺端宽度的比值来评估外侧柱受累情况。本研究旨在评估非佩特兹病儿童股骨近端骨骺的高宽比,并找出佩特兹病中高宽比与外侧柱分类之间的关系。
2009年至2015年开展了一项横断面研究。第一阶段纳入2至15岁未患佩特兹病的儿童。第二阶段纳入2至15岁患佩特兹病的儿童。排除其他股骨近端骨骺异常情况。在每个阶段,由两名评估者分别独立测量两次外侧柱高度和干骺端宽度。确定观察者内和观察者间的一致性水平、高宽比以及区分外侧柱类型的截断点。
有69名儿童(87张髋关节X线片)未患佩特兹病,18名患佩特兹病的男孩(20张髋关节X线片)。非佩特兹病组的高宽比在2至10岁时从0.38增至0.48,并在成年前保持稳定。外侧柱A/非佩特兹病髋关节的平均高宽比为0.47±0.05,外侧柱B或B/C为0.32±0.05,外侧柱C为0.18±0.05。佩特兹病中高宽比的观察者内和观察者间一致性水平分别为0.007(95%置信区间,-0.030至0.043)和0.006(95%置信区间,-0.119至0.107)。区分外侧柱A与B或B/C的截断值为0.40,区分外侧柱B或B/C与C的截断值为0.25,准确率为90%,受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.9。
高宽比有助于评估单侧和双侧佩特兹病的严重程度分级。它具有出色的可靠性和有效性,并有确切的截断值来估计外侧柱分类。
二级诊断性研究。