• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Short interval of biopsy to robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy does not render any adverse effects on the perioperative outcomes.活检与机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术之间的间隔时间较短不会对围手术期结果产生任何不利影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(36):e11686. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011686.
2
Benchmarks for operative outcomes of robotic and open radical prostatectomy: results from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与开放性根治性前列腺切除术的手术结果基准:健康专业人员随访研究的结果
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):432-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.039. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
3
Can robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) be performed very soon after biopsy?活检后不久就能进行机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(RALP)吗?
World J Urol. 2017 Apr;35(4):605-612. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1893-4. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
4
Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.保留Retzius间隙与标准机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术治疗临床局限性前列腺癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 18;8(8):CD013641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013641.pub2.
5
Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy learning curve for experienced laparoscopic surgeons: does it really exist?经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生进行机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的学习曲线:它真的存在吗?
Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Jan-Feb;42(1):83-9. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0485.
6
Impact of Variations in Prostatic Apex Shape on Apical Margin Positive Rate After Radical Prostatectomy: Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy vs Open Radical Prostatectomy.前列腺尖部形态变异对根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性率的影响:机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与开放性根治性前列腺切除术的比较
J Endourol. 2018 Jan;32(1):46-53. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0693. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
7
Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner?经耻骨后、腹腔镜和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的比较:谁是赢家?
World J Urol. 2018 Apr;36(4):609-621. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2174-1. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
8
Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy.原发前列腺癌手术治疗中切缘阳性率和围手术期并发症发生率的系统评价和荟萃分析:比较经耻骨后、腹腔镜和机器人前列腺切除术。
Eur Urol. 2012 Jul;62(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.029. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
9
Radical prostatectomy after previous transurethral resection of the prostate: robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy in a matched-pair analysis.经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)后行根治性前列腺切除术:机器人辅助腹腔镜与开放性根治性前列腺切除术的配对分析。
J Endourol. 2012 Sep;26(9):1136-41. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0074. Epub 2012 May 31.
10
Laparoscopic surgery experience does not influence oncological and functional results of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.腹腔镜手术经验不会影响机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术的肿瘤学和功能结果。
Urologia. 2022 May;89(2):240-243. doi: 10.1177/03915603211004781. Epub 2021 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel Combinatorial Approaches to Tackle the Immunosuppressive Microenvironment of Prostate Cancer.应对前列腺癌免疫抑制微环境的新型组合方法。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 8;13(5):1145. doi: 10.3390/cancers13051145.
2
Does time interval between prostate biopsy and surgery affect outcomes of radical prostatectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.前列腺活检与手术之间的时间间隔是否会影响根治性前列腺切除术的结果?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2020 Apr;52(4):619-631. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02344-6. Epub 2019 Nov 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy for detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.经直肠与经会阴前列腺穿刺活检在前列腺癌检测中的比较:一项荟萃分析和试验序贯分析
Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 4;8(14):23322-23336. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15056.
2
Cancer Statistics, 2017.《2017 年癌症统计》
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jan;67(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
3
Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy following transrectal compared to transperineal prostate biopsy: surgical, oncological and functional outcomes.
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017 Feb;69(1):85-92. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02759-4. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
4
Higher number of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy cores is associated with higher blood loss and perioperative complications in robot assisted radical prostatectomy.在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中,经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检芯数量较多与出血量增加及围手术期并发症相关。
Actas Urol Esp. 2017 Apr;41(3):155-161. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2016.09.012. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
5
EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.EAU-ESTRO-SIOG 前列腺癌诊治指南。第 1 部分:筛查、诊断及有治愈意图的局部治疗。
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):618-629. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
6
Can robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) be performed very soon after biopsy?活检后不久就能进行机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(RALP)吗?
World J Urol. 2017 Apr;35(4):605-612. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1893-4. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
7
Cancer statistics in China, 2015.《中国癌症统计数据 2015》
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Mar-Apr;66(2):115-32. doi: 10.3322/caac.21338. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
8
Delay from biopsy to radical prostatectomy influences the rate of adverse pathologic outcomes.从活检到根治性前列腺切除术的延迟会影响不良病理结果的发生率。
Prostate. 2015 Jul 1;75(10):1085-91. doi: 10.1002/pros.22992. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
9
Interval from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy does not affect immediate operative outcomes for open or minimally invasive approach.前列腺活检至根治性前列腺切除术的时间间隔不影响开放或微创入路的近期手术结果。
J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Dec;29(12):1688-93. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.12.1688. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
10
Current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: how does it compare with other surgical approaches?机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的现状:与其他手术方法相比如何?
Int J Urol. 2013 Mar;20(3):271-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03193.x. Epub 2012 Oct 29.

活检与机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术之间的间隔时间较短不会对围手术期结果产生任何不利影响。

Short interval of biopsy to robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy does not render any adverse effects on the perioperative outcomes.

作者信息

He Minke, Li Yaohui, Xiang Zhuoyi, Sun Li-An, Zhu Yanjun, Hu Xiaoyi, Guo Jianming, Wang Hang

机构信息

Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(36):e11686. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011686.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000011686
PMID:30200063
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6133572/
Abstract

The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of prostate biopsy on perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).A total of 181 patients who underwent the RALP in our institution have been retrospectively reviewed, patients were divided into different groups according to the interval of biopsy to RALP and core numbers of biopsy. Perioperative outcomes including estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time (OT), surgical margin status, postoperative drainage, hospital stay, and perioperative complications were served as endpoints.Interval of biopsy to RALP was not significantly correlated with any perioperative outcomes, while the biopsy core numbers had significant correlation with the EBL. In logistic regression analysis, the biopsy core numbers were associated with higher risk of positive surgical margins. Body mass index (BMI) was also a significant factor related to OT.Delay of the RALP after biopsy was not applicable in the era of RALP and surgeons could be more freely in selecting the time of RALP. Besides, further studies should focus on how to improve the diagnostic efficiency of prostate cancer without increasing the incidence of surgical complications.

摘要

我们研究的目的是调查前列腺活检对机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RALP)围手术期结局的影响。对在我们机构接受RALP的181例患者进行了回顾性分析,根据活检至RALP的时间间隔和活检的芯数将患者分为不同组。围手术期结局包括估计失血量(EBL)、手术时间(OT)、手术切缘状态、术后引流、住院时间和围手术期并发症作为观察终点。活检至RALP的时间间隔与任何围手术期结局均无显著相关性,而活检芯数与EBL有显著相关性。在逻辑回归分析中,活检芯数与手术切缘阳性风险较高相关。体重指数(BMI)也是与OT相关的一个重要因素。在RALP时代,活检后延迟RALP并不适用,外科医生在选择RALP时间方面可以更加自由。此外,进一步的研究应集中在如何在不增加手术并发症发生率 的情况下提高前列腺癌的诊断效率。