Schreiner Anna Janine, Schmidutz Florian, Ateschrang Atesch, Ihle Christoph, Stöckle Ulrich, Ochs Björn Gunnar, Gonser Christoph
BG Trauma Center Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstrasse 95, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Munich (LMU), Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Sep 11;19(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2250-0.
Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are an increasing problem and challenging to treat. The tibial side is commonly less affected than the femoral side wherefore few studies and case reports are available. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of periprosthetic tibial fractures and compare our data with current literature.
All periprosthetic tibial TKA fractures that were treated at our Level 1 Trauma Center between 2011 and 2015 were included and analyzed consecutively. The Felix classification was used to assess the fracture type and evaluation included the radiological and clinical outcome (Knee Society Score/KSS, Oxford Knee Score/OKS).
From a total of 50 periprosthetic TKA fractures, 9 cases (7 female, 2 male; 2 cruciate retaining, 7 constrained TKAs) involving the tibial side were identified. The mean age in this group was 77 (65-85) years with a follow-up rate of 67% after a mean of 22 (0-36) months. The Felix classification showed type IB (n = 1), type IIB (n = 2), type IIIA (n = 4) and type IIIB (n = 2) and surgical intervention included ORIF (n = 6), revision arthroplasty (n = 1), arthrodesis (n = 1) and amputation (n = 1). The rate of adverse events and revision was 55.6% including impaired wound healing, infection and re-fracture respectively peri-implant fracture. Main revision surgery included soft tissue surgery, arthrodesis, amputation and re-osteosynthesis. The clinical outcome showed a mean OKS of 29 (19-39) points and a functional/knee KSS of 53 (40-70)/41 (17-72) points. Radiological analyses showed 4 cases of malalignment after reduction and plate fixation.
Periprosthetic tibial fractures predominantly affect elderly patients with a reduced bone quality and reveal a high complication rate. Careful operative planning with individual solutions respecting the individual patient condition is crucial. If ORIF with a plate is considered, restoration of the correct alignment and careful soft tissue management including minimal invasive procedures seem important factors for the postoperative outcome.
全膝关节置换术(TKA)后假体周围骨折问题日益增多,治疗颇具挑战性。胫骨侧通常比股骨侧受影响小,因此相关研究和病例报告较少。本研究旨在分析假体周围胫骨骨折的治疗结果,并将我们的数据与现有文献进行比较。
纳入并连续分析2011年至2015年在我们的一级创伤中心接受治疗的所有假体周围胫骨TKA骨折病例。采用Felix分类法评估骨折类型,评估内容包括影像学和临床结果(膝关节协会评分/KSS、牛津膝关节评分/OKS)。
在总共50例假体周围TKA骨折中,发现9例累及胫骨侧(7例女性,2例男性;2例保留交叉韧带,7例限制性TKA)。该组患者平均年龄为77(65 - 85)岁,平均随访22(0 - 36)个月,随访率为67%。Felix分类显示为IB型(n = 1)、IIB型(n = 2)、IIIA型(n = 4)和IIIB型(n = 2),手术干预包括切开复位内固定(ORIF,n = 6)、翻修关节成形术(n = 1)、关节融合术(n = 1)和截肢术(n = 1)。不良事件和翻修率为55.6%,分别包括伤口愈合不良、感染以及假体周围骨折再骨折。主要翻修手术包括软组织手术、关节融合术、截肢术和再次骨固定术。临床结果显示,平均OKS为29(19 - 39)分,功能/膝关节KSS为53(40 - 70)/41(17 - 72)分。影像学分析显示,4例在复位和钢板固定后出现对线不良。
假体周围胫骨骨折主要影响骨质较差的老年患者,并发症发生率较高。根据个体患者情况制定仔细的手术计划并采用个体化解决方案至关重要。如果考虑使用钢板进行切开复位内固定,恢复正确对线以及仔细的软组织处理(包括微创操作)似乎是影响术后结果的重要因素。