Suppr超能文献

口腔膜剂崩解方法的比较研究。

Comparative study on disintegration methods for oral film preparations.

机构信息

Institute of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, Heinrich Heine University, Universitaetsstr. 1, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany.

Institute for Particle Technology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Volkmaroder Str. 5, 38104 Braunschweig, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2018 Nov;132:50-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Sep 7.

Abstract

Orodispersible films (ODFs) provide high application comfort due to rapid disintegration in the oral cavity. They increasingly found the approval of pharmaceutical research and development and were added to the European Pharmacopeia in 2012. The European Pharmacopeia explicitly demands disintegration testing for ODFs, but does not refer to a suitable method. The aim of this study was to collect and evaluate existing disintegration methods regarding their suitability to investigate different ODF formulations. Therefore, 21 ODF formulations produced at different gap heights and/or different amounts of suspended microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) particles were manufactured by solvent casting technique, using hypromellose (HPMC) as film-forming polymer. Four disintegration methods described in literature were applied to characterize the disintegration behavior of these formulations. They were the petri dish, the slide frame, slide frame and ball (SFaB) method as well as the PharmaTest disintegration tester equipped with a film sample holder. All methods show similar tendencies, at which the disintegration time proportionally increases with increasing dry film thicknesses. Reduced disintegration times were observed for ODFs containing insoluble MCC particles compared to their corresponding particle-free formulations. However, the suitability to investigate varying types of ODFs applying the four different test methods highly depends on the intended purpose. Therefore, the slide frame and SFaB method seems to be particularly applicable for research and development purposes, whereas the PharmaTest disintegration tester and the SFaB method fulfil the demands required for testing methods within the quality control.

摘要

口溶膜(ODF)由于在口腔内迅速崩解而提供了很高的应用舒适度。它们越来越受到药物研发的认可,并于 2012 年被加入欧洲药典。欧洲药典明确要求对 ODF 进行崩解测试,但没有提到合适的方法。本研究的目的是收集和评估现有的崩解方法,以评估其对不同 ODF 配方的适用性。因此,使用羟丙甲纤维素(HPMC)作为成膜聚合物,通过溶剂浇铸技术制造了 21 种在不同间隙高度和/或不同量悬浮微晶纤维素(MCC)颗粒下生产的 ODF 制剂。应用文献中描述的四种崩解方法来表征这些制剂的崩解行为。它们是培养皿法、滑动框法、滑动框和球法(SFaB 法)以及配备薄膜样品架的 PharmaTest 崩解测试仪。所有方法都显示出相似的趋势,其中崩解时间与干膜厚度成正比增加。与相应的无颗粒制剂相比,含有不溶性 MCC 颗粒的 ODF 的崩解时间减少。然而,应用这四种不同测试方法研究不同类型 ODF 的适用性在很大程度上取决于预期目的。因此,滑动框和 SFaB 方法似乎特别适用于研发目的,而 PharmaTest 崩解测试仪和 SFaB 方法满足质量控制测试方法的要求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验