Rufa Anne K, Fowler Patrick J
Department of Psychology, DePaul University, 2219 North Kenmore Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60614-3504, (773) 325-7887;
The Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, 1 Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196, St. Louis, MO 63130, (314) 935-5859;
Hous Policy Debate. 2018;28(2):285-298. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2017.1365256. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
The present study embedded a qualitative sub-study within a randomized controlled trial of housing services for child welfare-involved families to examine housing decisions made in the face of homelessness and child protection. Participants included a representative sample of caregivers ( = 19) randomized to receive the Family Unification Program - a permanent housing intervention for inadequately housed families under investigation for child abuse or neglect - or child welfare services-as-usual. Qualitative interviews 12 months after randomization assessed housing decision-making processes involved in keeping families safe and stable. Results indicated a push-pull dynamic that constrained housing choices regardless of whether permanent housing was made available. Caregiver housing decisions were constrained by time limitations, affordability, and access to services, while child and family safety was perceived as less important. Findings emphasize the need for housing informed child welfare services to ensure the long-term safety of children in families experiencing homelessness.
本研究在一项针对涉及儿童福利家庭的住房服务随机对照试验中纳入了一项定性子研究,以考察在面临无家可归和儿童保护问题时所做出的住房决策。参与者包括一个具有代表性的照顾者样本(n = 19),他们被随机分配接受家庭团聚计划——一项针对因虐待或忽视儿童而接受调查的住房条件不足家庭的永久性住房干预措施——或照常接受儿童福利服务。随机分组12个月后的定性访谈评估了保障家庭安全与稳定所涉及的住房决策过程。结果表明,无论是否提供永久性住房,都存在一种推拉动态,这种动态限制了住房选择。照顾者的住房决策受到时间限制、可承受性和服务可及性的制约,而儿童和家庭安全则被认为不那么重要。研究结果强调了需要以住房为导向的儿童福利服务,以确保无家可归家庭中儿童的长期安全。