Tobias Deirdre K, Manson JoAnn E
Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital (DKT, JEM), Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard Medical School (DKT, JEM), Boston, Massachusetts.
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2016 May 19;12(3):244-251. doi: 10.1177/1559827616650415. eCollection 2018 May-Jun.
The obesity paradox for survival among individuals with type 2 diabetes has been observed in some but not all studies. Conflicting evidence for the role of overweight and obesity in all-cause mortality may largely be a result of differences in study populations, epidemiological methods, and statistical analysis. For example, analyses among populations with long-term prevalent diabetes and the accrual of other chronic health conditions are more likely to observe that the sickest participants have lower body weights, and therefore, relative to normal weight, overweight and even obesity appear advantageous. Other mortality risk factors, such as smoking, also confound the relationship between body weight and survival, but this behavior varies widely in intensity and duration, making it difficult to assess and effectively adjust for in statistical models. Disentangling the potential sources of bias is imperative in understanding the relevance of excess body weight to mortality in diabetes. In this review, we summarize methodological considerations underlying the observed obesity paradox. Based on the available evidence, we conclude that the obesity paradox is likely an artifact of biases, and once these are accounted for, it is evident that compared with normal body weight, excess body weight is associated with a greater mortality risk.
2型糖尿病患者生存中的肥胖悖论在部分而非所有研究中都有观察到。超重和肥胖在全因死亡率中作用的证据相互矛盾,这很大程度上可能是由于研究人群、流行病学方法和统计分析的差异所致。例如,对长期患糖尿病人群以及其他慢性健康状况累积情况的分析更有可能观察到,病情最严重的参与者体重较低,因此,相对于正常体重,超重甚至肥胖显得更具优势。其他死亡风险因素,如吸烟,也会混淆体重与生存之间的关系,但这种行为在强度和持续时间上差异很大,使得在统计模型中难以评估和有效调整。理清潜在的偏倚来源对于理解超重与糖尿病死亡率的相关性至关重要。在本综述中,我们总结了观察到的肥胖悖论背后的方法学考量。基于现有证据,我们得出结论,肥胖悖论可能是偏倚造成的假象,一旦考虑到这些偏倚,很明显与正常体重相比,超重与更高的死亡风险相关。