Suppr超能文献

基于 CAD/CAM 的定制式正畸托槽排的离解力和剪切粘结强度,通过间接粘结法放置-一项体外研究。

Debonding force and shear bond strength of an array of CAD/CAM-based customized orthodontic brackets, placed by indirect bonding- An In Vitro study.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.

Department and Research institute of Dental Biomaterials and Bioengineering, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, and Brain Korea 21 PLUS project, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Sep 11;13(9):e0202952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202952. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Based on three-dimensional scanning and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) techniques, customized bracket systems are increasingly used. However, data remain limited regarding customized bracket design, characteristics, and stability. This study was undertaken to evaluate the design, bond strength, and residual adhesives of four different CAD/CAM customized brackets that were attached to human tooth specimens by indirect bonding. Thirty extracted human upper premolars were divided into five groups: Group 1, preadjusted self-ligating labial metal bracket; Group 2, lingual self-ligating metal injection molding customized bracket; Group 3, gold-casted lingual customized bracket; Group 4, labial self-ligating milled customized bracket; Group 5, labial customized resin base bracket. Except in Group 1, premolar specimens were scanned via model scanner, and the images were sent to each manufacturing company to fabricate customized brackets and transfer trays/jigs. Debonding force (DF; N) was measured by Instron universal testing machine and shear bond strength (SBS; MPa) was calculated via dividing DF by bonding area. Adhesive remnants were analyzed via stereo microscopic images. Group 2 (196.90±82.75 N) exhibited significantly higher DF than Group 1 (62.77±12.65 N); other groups exhibited similar DFs, compared with Group 1. No customized bracket groups exhibited significant differences in SBS, relative to Group 1 (6.73±1.36 MPa). However, SBS in Group 5 (11.46±7.22 MPa) was significantly higher than in Group 3 (3.58±2.14 MPa). Group 3 had significantly lower ARI scores than other groups (P<0.05). Customized brackets exhibited large deviations in DF and SBS; all customized bracket systems exhibited DF that was equivalent or superior to that of preadjusted brackets, even when placed by indirect bonding.

摘要

基于三维扫描和计算机辅助设计与计算机辅助制造 (CAD/CAM) 技术,越来越多地使用定制托槽系统。然而,关于定制托槽设计、特性和稳定性的数据仍然有限。本研究旨在评估通过间接粘接固定于人类牙标本上的四种不同 CAD/CAM 定制托槽的设计、粘接强度和残留粘结剂。将 30 颗提取的上颌前磨牙分为五组:组 1,预调整自锁唇侧金属托槽;组 2,舌侧自锁金属注塑定制托槽;组 3,金铸造舌侧定制托槽;组 4,唇侧自锁铣削定制托槽;组 5,唇侧定制树脂基托槽。除组 1 外,所有前磨牙标本均通过模型扫描仪进行扫描,并将图像发送至各制造公司以制作定制托槽和转移托盘/夹具。使用 Instron 万能试验机测量离脱力(DF;N),并通过将 DF 除以粘接面积计算剪切粘接强度(SBS;MPa)。通过立体显微镜图像分析残留粘结剂。组 2(196.90±82.75 N)的 DF 明显高于组 1(62.77±12.65 N);与组 1 相比,其他组的 DF 相似。与组 1 相比,没有任何定制托槽组的 SBS 存在显著差异(6.73±1.36 MPa)。然而,组 5(11.46±7.22 MPa)的 SBS 明显高于组 3(3.58±2.14 MPa)。组 3 的 ARI 评分明显低于其他组(P<0.05)。定制托槽的 DF 和 SBS 存在较大偏差;所有定制托槽系统的 DF 与预调整托槽相当或优于预调整托槽,即使通过间接粘接放置也是如此。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验