• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同正畸舌侧间接粘接材料的曲率依赖性抗剪粘接强度。

Curvature-dependent shear bond strength of different attachment materials for orthodontic lingual indirect bonding.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, University Medical Centre Regensburg, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University Medical Centre Regensburg, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 16;11(1):16611. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96164-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-96164-3
PMID:34400744
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8368096/
Abstract

To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of different attachment materials used for lingual bonding, the influence of artificial aging and the radii of curvature of the enamel surface on SBS, 192 third molars were photographed to determine the radius of curvature of the oral surface. After phosphoric acid etching a cylindrical test piece was bonded to the oral enamel using a mold that was filled with a chemically curing (Maximum Cure, Transbond IDB Premix) or a dual-curing (Nexus NX3, RelyX Unicem2) attachment material. SBS was tested after 24 h, 500 thermal cycles or 90 days at 37 °C with a universal testing machine. Computed tomography scans were performed to determine the bonded surface and calculate SBS. Values ranged from 8.3 to 20.9 MPa. RelyX Unicem2 showed the highest SBS values at baseline, 500 thermal cycles and after 90 days (p < 0.001). Ninety days of wet storage significantly reduced SBS of Maximum Cure (p = 0.028). The radius of curvature correlated positively with SBS (r = 0.204, p = 0.005). The SBS of all attachment materials was sufficient for clinical use, even after artificial aging. RelyX Unicem2 showed almost twice as high SBS values as the other attachment materials.

摘要

为了评估用于舌侧粘接的不同粘接材料的抗剪粘接强度(SBS),评估人工老化和牙釉质表面曲率半径对 SBS 的影响,拍摄了 192 颗第三磨牙的照片,以确定口腔表面的曲率半径。磷酸酸蚀后,使用充满化学固化(最大固化,Transbond IDB Premix)或双重固化(Nexus NX3,RelyX Unicem2)粘接材料的模具将圆柱形试件粘接到口腔牙釉质上。在 24 小时、500 次热循环或 37°C 下 90 天后,使用万能试验机测试 SBS。进行计算机断层扫描以确定粘接表面并计算 SBS。值范围为 8.3 至 20.9 MPa。RelyX Unicem2 在基线、500 次热循环和 90 天后表现出最高的 SBS 值(p < 0.001)。90 天的湿存储显着降低了 Maximum Cure 的 SBS(p = 0.028)。曲率半径与 SBS 呈正相关(r = 0.204,p = 0.005)。所有粘接材料的 SBS 都足以满足临床使用要求,即使经过人工老化。RelyX Unicem2 的 SBS 值几乎是其他粘接材料的两倍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eafd/8368096/9eed88aa1b69/41598_2021_96164_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eafd/8368096/861c7b38d9f0/41598_2021_96164_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eafd/8368096/da13132f092f/41598_2021_96164_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eafd/8368096/a5e9b8565456/41598_2021_96164_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eafd/8368096/3d0ac38f1123/41598_2021_96164_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eafd/8368096/9eed88aa1b69/41598_2021_96164_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eafd/8368096/861c7b38d9f0/41598_2021_96164_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eafd/8368096/da13132f092f/41598_2021_96164_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eafd/8368096/a5e9b8565456/41598_2021_96164_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eafd/8368096/3d0ac38f1123/41598_2021_96164_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eafd/8368096/9eed88aa1b69/41598_2021_96164_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Curvature-dependent shear bond strength of different attachment materials for orthodontic lingual indirect bonding.不同正畸舌侧间接粘接材料的曲率依赖性抗剪粘接强度。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 16;11(1):16611. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96164-3.
2
Evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic molar tubes bonded using hydrophilic primers: An in vitro study.使用亲水性底漆粘结的正畸磨牙管剪切粘结强度的评估:一项体外研究。
Int Orthod. 2019 Sep;17(3):461-468. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
3
A new generation of self-etching adhesives: comparison with traditional acid etch technique.新一代自酸蚀粘结剂:与传统酸蚀技术的比较。
J Orofac Orthop. 2008 Mar;69(2):78-93. doi: 10.1007/s00056-008-0709-6.
4
The in vitro effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength with different enamel conditioning procedures.不同牙釉质处理程序下重复粘接对剪切粘接强度的体外影响。
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Jun;32(3):291-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp128. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
5
Resin-modified glass ionomer cements for bonding orthodontic retainers.用于粘结正畸保持器的树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀。
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Jun;32(3):254-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp066. Epub 2009 Sep 30.
6
Effect of early orthodontic force on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different adhesive systems.不同粘接系统正畸托槽的早期正畸力对剪切粘接强度的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Aug;138(2):208-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.09.034.
7
Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different self-etching adhesives.使用不同自酸蚀粘接剂粘接的正畸托槽的剪切粘接强度。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Sep;136(3):425-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.024.
8
Enamel shear bond strength of two orthodontic self-etching bonding systems compared to Transbond™ XT.与Transbond™ XT相比,两种正畸自酸蚀粘结系统的釉质剪切粘结强度。
J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Nov;77(6):391-399. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0046-0. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
9
Effects of a fluoride-containing casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate complex on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.含氟酪蛋白磷酸肽-无定形磷酸钙复合物对正畸托槽粘结强度的影响。
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Apr;34(2):193-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq183. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
10
Effect of bromelain and papain gel on enamel deproteinisation before orthodontic bracket bonding.菠萝蛋白酶和木瓜蛋白酶凝胶对正畸托槽粘结前牙釉质脱蛋白的影响
Aust Orthod J. 2016 May;32(1):23-30.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative in vitro study of bond strength of two-step orthodontic bonding systems : Self-adhesive composite vs. self-etching primer.两种正畸粘接系统粘结强度的体外比较研究:自粘结复合材料与自酸蚀底漆
J Orofac Orthop. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1007/s00056-025-00612-y.
2
Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia restorations and metal brackets.不同预处理和附着材料对整体氧化锆修复体与金属托槽之间抗剪粘接强度的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 20;12(1):8514. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12542-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of thermal cycling on temperature changes and bond strength in different test specimens.热循环对不同测试样本温度变化及粘结强度的影响。
Biomater Investig Dent. 2020 Jan 29;7(1):16-24. doi: 10.1080/26415275.2019.1709470. eCollection 2020.
2
Assessment of Bonding Effectiveness of Adhesive Materials to Tooth Structure using Bond Strength Test Methods: A Review of Literature.使用粘结强度测试方法评估粘结材料与牙体组织的粘结效果:文献综述
Open Dent J. 2018 Sep 28;12:664-678. doi: 10.2174/1745017901814010664. eCollection 2018.
3
Debonding force and shear bond strength of an array of CAD/CAM-based customized orthodontic brackets, placed by indirect bonding- An In Vitro study.
基于 CAD/CAM 的定制式正畸托槽排的离解力和剪切粘结强度,通过间接粘结法放置-一项体外研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 11;13(9):e0202952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202952. eCollection 2018.
4
Adhesive systems for CAD-CAM customised lingual orthodontic brackets: which one is better?用于计算机辅助设计与制造(CAD-CAM)定制舌侧正畸托槽的粘结系统:哪种更好?
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2017 Sep;18(3):188-192. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2017.18.03.04.
5
Dental Cements for Luting and Bonding Restorations: Self-Adhesive Resin Cements.用于粘结修复体的牙科水门汀:自粘结树脂水门汀。
Dent Clin North Am. 2017 Oct;61(4):821-834. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2017.06.006.
6
Academy of Dental Materials guidance on in vitro testing of dental composite bonding effectiveness to dentin/enamel using micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) approach.牙科材料学会关于使用微拉伸结合强度 (μTBS) 方法体外测试牙本质/牙釉质牙用复合树脂粘结效果的指导意见。
Dent Mater. 2017 Feb;33(2):133-143. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.11.015. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
7
How long does treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances last? A systematic review.固定正畸矫治器的治疗持续多长时间?一项系统评价。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Mar;149(3):308-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.020.
8
2013 JCO Orthodontic Practice Study. Part 1: trends.2013年《临床肿瘤学杂志》正畸实践研究。第1部分:趋势。
J Clin Orthod. 2013 Nov;47(11):661-80.
9
Debonding forces of three different customized bases of a lingual bracket system.一种舌侧托槽系统的三种不同定制基底的脱粘力。
Korean J Orthod. 2013 Oct;43(5):235-41. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2013.43.5.235. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
10
Bonding techniques in lingual orthodontics.舌侧正畸中的粘结技术。
J Orthod. 2013 Sep;40 Suppl 1:S20-6. doi: 10.1179/1465313313Y.0000000060.