• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿巴拉契亚地区的患者在加入等待名单后获得肝移植的机会减少。

Patients From Appalachia Have Reduced Access to Liver Transplantation After Wait-Listing.

作者信息

Beal Eliza W, Tumin Dmitry, Sobotka Lindsay, Tobias Joseph D, Hayes Don, Pawlik Timothy M, Washburn Kenneth, Mumtaz Khalid, Conteh Lanla, Black Sylvester M

机构信息

1 Division of Transplantation, Department of General Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.

2 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.

出版信息

Prog Transplant. 2018 Dec;28(4):305-313. doi: 10.1177/1526924818800037. Epub 2018 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1177/1526924818800037
PMID:30205758
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Appalachian region is medically underserved and characterized by high morbidity and mortality. We investigated disparities among patients listed for liver transplantation (LT) in wait-list outcomes, according to residence in the Appalachian region.

METHODS

Data on adult patients listed for LT were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing for July 2013 to December 2015. Wait-list outcomes were compared using cause-specific hazard models by region of residence (Appalachian vs non-Appalachian) among patients listed at centers serving Appalachia. Posttransplant patient and graft survival were also compared. The study included 1835 LT candidates from Appalachia and 5200 from non-Appalachian regions, of whom 1016 patients experienced wait-list mortality or were delisted; 3505 received liver transplants.

RESULTS

In multivariable analyses, patients from Appalachia were less likely to receive LT (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79-0.93; P < .001), but Appalachian residence was not associated with wait-list mortality or delisting (HR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.89-1.18; P = .696). Among liver transplant recipients, patient and graft survival did not differ by Appalachian versus non-Appalachian residence.

CONCLUSION

Appalachian residence was associated with lower access to transplantation after listing for LT. This geographic disparity should be addressed in the current debate over reforming donor liver allocation and patient priority for LT.

摘要

背景

阿巴拉契亚地区医疗服务不足,发病率和死亡率较高。我们根据居住在阿巴拉契亚地区的情况,调查了等待肝移植(LT)患者在等待名单结果方面的差异。

方法

从器官共享联合网络获取2013年7月至2015年12月期间等待LT的成年患者数据。在为阿巴拉契亚地区服务的中心登记的患者中,使用特定病因风险模型按居住地区(阿巴拉契亚地区与非阿巴拉契亚地区)比较等待名单结果。还比较了移植后患者和移植物的存活率。该研究包括1835名来自阿巴拉契亚地区的LT候选人以及5200名来自非阿巴拉契亚地区的候选人,其中1016名患者在等待名单上死亡或被除名;3505名接受了肝移植。

结果

在多变量分析中,来自阿巴拉契亚地区的患者接受LT的可能性较小(风险比[HR]=0.86;95%置信区间[CI]:0.79-0.93;P<.001),但居住在阿巴拉契亚地区与等待名单上的死亡率或除名无关(HR=1.03;95%CI:0.89-1.18;P=0.696)。在肝移植受者中,患者和移植物的存活率在阿巴拉契亚地区与非阿巴拉契亚地区的居住者之间没有差异。

结论

居住在阿巴拉契亚地区与LT列入名单后获得移植的机会较低有关。在当前关于改革供体肝脏分配和LT患者优先级的辩论中,应解决这种地理差异。

相似文献

1
Patients From Appalachia Have Reduced Access to Liver Transplantation After Wait-Listing.阿巴拉契亚地区的患者在加入等待名单后获得肝移植的机会减少。
Prog Transplant. 2018 Dec;28(4):305-313. doi: 10.1177/1526924818800037. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
2
The race to liver transplantation: a comparison of patients with and without hepatocellular carcinoma from listing to post-transplantation.肝移植竞赛:肝细胞癌患者与非肝细胞癌患者从列入名单到移植后情况的比较
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Jun;220(6):1001-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.050. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
3
Outcomes for liver transplant candidates listed with low model for end-stage liver disease score.终末期肝病模型评分低的肝移植候选者的结局
Liver Transpl. 2015 Nov;21(11):1403-9. doi: 10.1002/lt.24307.
4
Quantifying Sex-Based Disparities in Liver Allocation.量化肝移植分配中的性别差异。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jul 1;155(7):e201129. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1129. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
5
Rates of solid-organ wait-listing, transplantation, and survival among residents of rural and urban areas.农村和城市地区居民的实体器官等待名单登记率、移植率和生存率。
JAMA. 2008 Jan 9;299(2):202-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2007.50.
6
Factors Associated With Access to and Receipt of Liver Transplantation in Veterans With End-stage Liver Disease.与终末期肝病退伍军人获得肝移植和接受肝移植相关的因素。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Jul 1;181(7):949-959. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2051.
7
Analysis of Liver Offers to Pediatric Candidates on the Transplant Wait List.对移植等待名单上儿科候选者肝脏供体情况的分析。
Gastroenterology. 2017 Oct;153(4):988-995. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.06.053. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
8
A 10-Year united network for organ sharing review of mortality and risk factors in young children awaiting liver transplantation.器官共享联合网络对等待肝移植幼儿的死亡率及风险因素进行的10年回顾。
Liver Transpl. 2016 Nov;22(11):1584-1592. doi: 10.1002/lt.24605.
9
Sex Disparity in Liver Transplant and Access to Living Donation.性别差异与肝移植和活体捐赠机会
JAMA Surg. 2021 Nov 1;156(11):1010-1017. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.3586.
10
Increasing Liver Transplantation Wait-List Dropout for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Widening Geographical Disparities: Implications for Organ Allocation.肝癌导致肝移植候补者不断退出,且地域差异不断扩大:对器官分配的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2018 Oct;24(10):1346-1356. doi: 10.1002/lt.25317.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of inequities in access to organ transplant in the United States.美国器官移植获取机会不公平的范围综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Feb 12;21(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01616-x.