Schumaier Adam, Minoughan Chelsea, Jimenez Andrew, Grawe Brian
Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
J Knee Surg. 2019 Aug;32(8):812-819. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1669787. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
The ideal treatment for isolated, full-thickness tears of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to determine how the majority of orthopaedic surgeons treat isolated, full-thickness tears of the PCL. In July 2017, a 17-question multiple-choice survey regarding the treatment of isolated, full-thickness tears of the PCL was emailed to 3,500 orthopaedic sports medicine surgeons with membership in the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine. Responders answered multiple-choice questions related to indications, technique, graft choice, bracing, and weight-bearing status following reconstruction. Answer choices were then analyzed against surgeon-specific variables. The survey was completed by 663 orthopaedic surgeons. Of the responders, 93% were fellowship trained in sports medicine with an average practice duration of 13 years. The total number of PCLs reconstructed per surgeon was low, 11.6. On average, surgeons estimate they reconstruct the PCL in only 22% of patients with full-thickness tears. The two most common surgical indications were functional limitations and failure of physical therapy. The reconstruction of choice involves a transtibial approach (63%) with a single bundle (87%) allograft (83%) of the Achilles tendon (51%). The postoperative brace is typically locked in extension (66%), and weight-bearing is delayed for 3.8 weeks. Of the surgeons with the fewest years of experience, 39% use all-inside, 89% use allograft, and 24% use dynamic bracing. Compared with surgeons with the most years of experience, only 16% use all-inside ( < 0.01), 57% use allograft ( < 0.01), and 11% use dynamic bracing ( = 0.01). Isolated, full-thickness tears of the PCL are rare injuries that are infrequently reconstructed. The most common indications for reconstruction are functional limitations and failure of conservative management. Most surgeons' treatment of choice for reconstruction involves a transtibial approach with a single bundle Achilles allograft and a postoperative brace locked in extension. On average, weight-bearing is prolonged for 3.8 weeks. The all-inside technique, allograft, and dynamic bracing are becoming more popular.
对于孤立性、后交叉韧带(PCL)全层撕裂的理想治疗方法尚无定论。本研究的目的是确定大多数骨科医生如何治疗孤立性、PCL全层撕裂。2017年7月,一份关于孤立性、PCL全层撕裂治疗的包含17个问题的多项选择题调查问卷通过电子邮件发送给了3500名美国运动医学骨科协会会员的骨科运动医学医生。受访者回答了与重建后的适应症、技术、移植物选择、支具使用和负重状态相关的多项选择题。然后根据医生的特定变量对答案选项进行分析。663名骨科医生完成了该调查。在受访者中,93%接受过运动医学专科培训,平均执业年限为13年。每位医生重建PCL的总数较低,为11.6例。平均而言,医生估计他们仅在22%的全层撕裂患者中重建PCL。最常见的两个手术适应症是功能受限和物理治疗失败。首选的重建方法是经胫骨入路(63%),采用单束(87%)同种异体移植物(83%),其中跟腱移植物占51%。术后支具通常锁定在伸直位(66%),负重延迟3.8周。在经验最少的医生中,39%使用全内置技术,89%使用同种异体移植物,24%使用动态支具。与经验最丰富的医生相比,只有16%使用全内置技术(<0.01),57%使用同种异体移植物(<0.01),11%使用动态支具(=0.01)。孤立性、PCL全层撕裂是罕见的损伤,很少进行重建。重建最常见的适应症是功能受限和保守治疗失败。大多数医生选择重建的治疗方法是经胫骨入路,使用单束跟腱同种异体移植物,并使用锁定在伸直位的术后支具。平均而言,负重延长3.8周。全内置技术、同种异体移植物和动态支具越来越受欢迎。