Suppr超能文献

腘血管创伤:手术入路与血管优先策略

Popliteal vessel trauma: Surgical approaches and the vessel-first strategy.

作者信息

Fairhurst Paul G, Wyss Thomas R, Weiss Salome, Becker Daniel, Schmidli Juerg, Makaloski Vladimir

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Knee. 2018 Oct;25(5):849-855. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Jun 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In this study, we analyzed long-term outcomes following treatment of traumatic popliteal vascular injuries in an urban level I trauma center, using a vessel-first approach in the case of combined vascular and bony/ligamentous injuries and discussing the relative merits of the medial and posterior approach to popliteal vessels.

METHODS

Data including patient demographics, mechanism and type of injury, severity of limb ischemia, Injury Severity Score (ISS), limb ischemia time, time to revascularization from admission, treatment strategy, type of vascular reconstruction, limb salvage and mortality were retrospectively collected in patients treated for traumatic popliteal vessel lesions. All patients in this study were operatively treated using medial and posterior approaches. A vessel-first approach was used where possible.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (13 male) with a median age of 45 years (range 21-88) and popliteal vessel injury after traumatic knee dislocation (n = 10, 42%), proximal tibia fracture (n = 5, 21%), distal femur fracture (n = 4, 17%), blunt popliteal injury (n = 3, 12%) and penetrating trauma (n = 2, 8%) were identified. Twelve (50%) patients were treated via a medial approach and 12 (50%) via a posterior approach. All had injury of the popliteal artery (15 complete transection, eight local intimal disruption and one pseudoaneurysm) with seven having additional popliteal vein and five with nerve injury. Nineteen patients (88%) presented with limb ischemia Rutherford category ≥II. Vessel reconstruction (four direct sutures, four patch plasties, 16 venous interposition/bypasses) was performed prior to bone/joint stabilization in 22 patients (92%). Thirty-day mortality was zero. Two above-knee amputations were performed within 30 days due to severe infection. During a median follow-up of 59 (range 12-143) months, there were no deaths and no amputations. At the end of follow-up, all patients denied claudication.

CONCLUSIONS

The vessel-first strategy promises an excellent outcome, independent of the surgical approach needed to repair traumatic popliteal vessel injuries.

摘要

背景

在本研究中,我们分析了在城市一级创伤中心治疗创伤性腘血管损伤后的长期结果,对于合并血管和骨/韧带损伤的情况采用血管优先方法,并讨论了腘血管内侧和后侧入路的相对优点。

方法

回顾性收集因创伤性腘血管损伤接受治疗的患者的数据,包括患者人口统计学资料、损伤机制和类型、肢体缺血严重程度、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、肢体缺血时间、入院至血管再通时间、治疗策略、血管重建类型、肢体挽救情况和死亡率。本研究中的所有患者均采用内侧和后侧入路进行手术治疗。尽可能采用血管优先方法。

结果

确定了24例患者(13例男性),中位年龄45岁(范围21 - 88岁),创伤性膝关节脱位后腘血管损伤(n = 10,42%),胫骨近端骨折(n = 5,21%),股骨远端骨折(n = 4,17%),钝性腘部损伤(n = 3,12%)和穿透伤(n = 2,8%)。12例(50%)患者采用内侧入路治疗,12例(50%)采用后侧入路治疗。所有患者均有腘动脉损伤(15例完全横断,8例局部内膜破裂,1例假性动脉瘤),7例伴有腘静脉损伤,5例伴有神经损伤。19例(88%)患者出现肢体缺血Rutherford分级≥II级。22例(92%)患者在骨/关节稳定之前进行了血管重建(4例直接缝合,4例补片成形术,16例静脉移植/旁路手术)。30天死亡率为零。由于严重感染,30天内进行了2例膝上截肢。在中位随访59个月(范围12 - 143个月)期间,无死亡病例,无截肢病例。随访结束时,所有患者均否认有间歇性跛行。

结论

血管优先策略有望取得良好的结果,与修复创伤性腘血管损伤所需的手术入路无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验