Prêtre R, Bruschweiler I, Rossier J, Chilcott M, Bednarkiewicz M, Kürsteiner K, Kalangos A, Hoffmeyer P, Faidutti B
Clinique de Chirurgie Cardio-vasculaire, Département de Chirurgie, Hôpital Cantonal Universitaire, Genéve, Switzerland.
J Trauma. 1996 Apr;40(4):595-601. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199604000-00013.
A retrospective analysis of blunt trauma to the lower extremity with injury to the popliteal vessels was undertaken in an attempt to determine the major predictors of outcome and to expose the shortcomings of our management. Thirty-one patients with lower extremity trauma including a popliteal artery injury were admitted to our clinic between 1979 and 1993. Two patients died of hemorrhagic shock or from associated lesions. Amputation of the leg was performed primarily in one patient because of massive tissue damage and secondarily in five patients because of uncontrolled local infection (two patients), excessive tissue damage (two patients), and persistent ischemia (one patient who later died). A peripheral neurologic deficit resulted in 12 of 24 non-amputated extremities. Three additional patients suffered sequelae from bone and joint damage. In all, nine patients recovered completely from their limb injury. Severe ischemia of the leg was found to be an indicator of major limb damage and was a strong determinant of poor outcome. Of 18 patients with severe ischemia, two died (one after amputation), five were amputated, and eight were left with a peripheral neuropathy. Only two patients recovered completely. Of 13 patients with relative ischemia, five recovered completely and four sustained a peripheral neuropathy. The deleterious effects of delayed revascularization were evident in four patients who developed a peripheral neuropathy secondarily. Morbidity from the ischemic insult could have been reduced in seven patients: the diagnosis was missed in two, its seriousness not realized in one, and a non-optimal management led to an excessive ischemic time in four. The magnitude of skeletal and soft tissue injury, alone or in combination, was also strongly associated with an increased morbidity. Most patients with blunt lower limb trauma and popliteal vascular injury are left with serious sequelae from associated neuro-musculo-skeletal damage and from ischemia. Although the magnitude of the first variable is determined by initial trauma and cannot be altered, a constant awareness of possible arterial injury in lower limb trauma, and adherence to a plan of management according to the ischemic state of the leg, should help avoid the additional deleterious effects of prolonged ischemia.
对伴有腘血管损伤的下肢钝性创伤进行了回顾性分析,以确定预后的主要预测因素并揭示我们治疗方法的不足之处。1979年至1993年间,31例伴有腘动脉损伤的下肢创伤患者被收治入我院。2例患者死于失血性休克或相关损伤。1例患者因大量组织损伤而初次行截肢术,5例患者因局部感染无法控制(2例)、组织损伤过度(2例)和持续性缺血(1例,该患者后来死亡)而二次行截肢术。24例未截肢的肢体中有12例出现周围神经功能缺损。另外3例患者因骨与关节损伤而出现后遗症。总共有9例患者肢体损伤完全恢复。发现腿部严重缺血是肢体严重损伤的一个指标,也是预后不良的一个重要决定因素。18例严重缺血患者中,2例死亡(1例截肢后死亡),5例行截肢术,8例遗留周围神经病变。只有2例患者完全康复。13例相对缺血患者中,5例完全康复,4例出现周围神经病变。4例继发周围神经病变的患者中,延迟血管重建的有害影响明显。7例患者缺血性损伤的发病率本可降低:2例漏诊,1例未认识到其严重性,4例因治疗不当导致缺血时间过长。单独或合并存在的骨骼和软组织损伤程度也与发病率增加密切相关。大多数伴有下肢钝性创伤和腘血管损伤的患者因相关的神经肌肉骨骼损伤和缺血而遗留严重后遗症。虽然第一个变量的程度由初始创伤决定且无法改变,但对下肢创伤中可能存在的动脉损伤保持持续警惕,并根据腿部缺血状态坚持治疗方案,应有助于避免长时间缺血带来的额外有害影响。