Baron J A, Schori A, Crow B, Carter R, Mann J I
Am J Public Health. 1986 Nov;76(11):1293-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.11.1293.
Among 135 overweight subjects, we conducted a three-month randomized controlled trial of two sets of dietary advice, each providing approximately 1,000 calories per day but differing in fiber, carbohydrate, and fat content. Information on weight and eating habits, as well as measures of lipoprotein and glucose metabolism were obtained at entry and one and three months later. We found that dieters given low carbohydrate/low fiber dietary advice tended to lose more weight than those given a higher carbohydrate/higher fiber regimen (5.0 vs 3.7 kg on average at three months). This pattern was particularly marked among women, and among participants who were under age 40 or of lower social class. There were no differences between the diet groups in the proportion complaining of hunger but, in general, members of the low carbohydrate group complained of more problems in dieting. There were only minor differences in the serum lipoprotein patterns during the diet period. In view of these results, we believe previous claims of the benefits of fiber for weight loss may have been overstated.
在135名超重受试者中,我们进行了一项为期三个月的随机对照试验,比较两组饮食建议的效果。每组饮食建议每天提供约1000卡路里热量,但纤维、碳水化合物和脂肪含量不同。在试验开始时、一个月后和三个月后分别获取了体重和饮食习惯信息,以及脂蛋白和葡萄糖代谢指标。我们发现,接受低碳水化合物/低纤维饮食建议的节食者比接受高碳水化合物/高纤维饮食方案的节食者减重更多(三个月时平均减重分别为5.0千克和3.7千克)。这种模式在女性中尤为明显,在40岁以下或社会阶层较低的参与者中也是如此。两组饮食人群中抱怨饥饿的比例没有差异,但总体而言,低碳水化合物组的成员抱怨节食过程中出现的问题更多。在节食期间,两组的血清脂蛋白模式只有细微差异。鉴于这些结果,我们认为之前关于纤维对减肥有益的说法可能有些夸大。