• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨科期刊的影响因子与证据水平之间的关系。

RELATION BETWEEN IMPACT FACTOR IN ORTHOPEDIC JOURNALS AND LEVEL OF EVIDENCE.

作者信息

de Barros Mauricio Pandini Monteiro, Matsunaga Fabio Teruo, Tamaoki Marcel Jun Sugawara

机构信息

Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Acta Ortop Bras. 2018;26(4):275-277. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220182604168767.

DOI:10.1590/1413-785220182604168767
PMID:30210260
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6131278/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the quality of articles published in the leading orthopedic surgery journals, by measuring the relation between the impact factor and the number studies with a high level of evidence.

METHODS

A literature review was performed of articles published in four previously selected journals. A score of journal evidence (RER - Relation between Randomized clinical trials and Systematic reviews) was calculated, considering the number of RCTs and SR published and the total number of full-text articles.

RESULTS

The selected journals were JBJS-Am, ASMJ, BJJ-Br and Arthroscopy, with Impact factors of 5.280, 4.362, 3.309 and 3.206 respectively in 2015. In the study, the RER Scores, in the same order, were 9.408, 6.153, 7.456 and 7.779.

CONCLUSION

The journal JBJS-Am is the best available source of information on orthopedic surgery from this point of view. It has the highest Impact Factor and clearly the highest RER Score. On the other hand, we could conclude that the number of published RCT and good quality SR is very low, with less than 10% of all the articles.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过衡量影响因子与高水平证据研究数量之间的关系,评估主要骨外科期刊发表文章的质量。

方法

对在之前选定的四种期刊上发表的文章进行文献综述。计算期刊证据评分(RER——随机临床试验与系统评价之间的关系),考虑发表的随机对照试验(RCT)和系统评价(SR)的数量以及全文文章的总数。

结果

选定的期刊为《美国骨与关节外科杂志》(JBJS-Am)、《美国肩肘外科杂志》(ASMJ)、《英国骨与关节杂志》(BJJ-Br)和《关节镜杂志》,2015年的影响因子分别为5.280、4.362、3.309和3.206。在该研究中,相应顺序的RER评分分别为9.408、6.153、7.456和7.779。

结论

从这一角度来看,《美国骨与关节外科杂志》(JBJS-Am)是骨外科领域最佳的可用信息来源。它具有最高的影响因子,且显然具有最高的RER评分。另一方面,我们可以得出结论,已发表的随机对照试验和高质量系统评价的数量非常少,占所有文章的比例不到10%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c491/6131278/63291ab275fd/1809-4406-aob-26-04-0275-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c491/6131278/b5680aac757e/1809-4406-aob-26-04-0275-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c491/6131278/63291ab275fd/1809-4406-aob-26-04-0275-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c491/6131278/b5680aac757e/1809-4406-aob-26-04-0275-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c491/6131278/63291ab275fd/1809-4406-aob-26-04-0275-gf02.jpg

相似文献

1
RELATION BETWEEN IMPACT FACTOR IN ORTHOPEDIC JOURNALS AND LEVEL OF EVIDENCE.骨科期刊的影响因子与证据水平之间的关系。
Acta Ortop Bras. 2018;26(4):275-277. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220182604168767.
2
Citation Analysis of Articles about Hand Surgery Published in Orthopaedic and Hand Surgery Journals.骨科与手外科期刊发表的手外科相关文章的引文分析
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2019 Mar;24(1):36-44. doi: 10.1142/S2424835519500073.
3
Are randomized controlled trials in urology being conducted with justification?泌尿外科的随机对照试验是否有充分的理由进行?
J Osteopath Med. 2021 May 21;121(8):665-671. doi: 10.1515/jom-2021-0078.
4
Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine.运动医学系统评价
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):533-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546515580290. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
5
6
Assessing the level of evidence in the orthopaedic literature, 2013-2018: a review of 3449 articles in leading orthopaedic journals.评估2013 - 2018年骨科文献的证据水平:对主要骨科期刊上3449篇文章的综述
Patient Saf Surg. 2020 May 16;14:23. doi: 10.1186/s13037-020-00246-6. eCollection 2020.
7
Orthopedics research output from China, USA, UK, Japan, Germany and France: A 10-year survey of the literature.中国、美国、英国、日本、德国和法国的骨科研究产出:十年文献调查
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Nov;102(7):939-945. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
8
Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis.高影响力医学期刊发表的随机试验相关文章的全球绘制:一项横断面分析。
Trials. 2020 Jan 7;21(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3944-9.
9
Orthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals Are Associated With Higher Altmetric Attention Scores and Social Media Attention Than Nonorthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials.发表在普通医学期刊上的骨科随机对照试验比非骨科随机对照试验具有更高的 Altmetric 关注度和社交媒体关注度。
Arthroscopy. 2021 Apr;37(4):1261-1270. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.09.015. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
10
How Has Statistical Testing in Orthopedics Changed Over Time? An Assessment of High Impact Journals Over 25 Years.骨科统计学检验方法是如何随时间变化的?25 年来对高影响力期刊的评估。
J Surg Educ. 2023 Jul;80(7):1046-1052. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.04.006. Epub 2023 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Ten-Year Trends in Level of Evidence in Hand Surgery.手部外科的证据水平十年趋势。
Hand (N Y). 2024 Jan;19(1):163-168. doi: 10.1177/15589447221093672. Epub 2022 May 13.

本文引用的文献

1
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS IN ORTHOPEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY: SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS ON THE NATIONAL EVIDENCE.骨科与创伤学中的随机对照试验:基于国家证据的系统分析
Rev Bras Ortop. 2015 Nov 16;45(6):601-5. doi: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30310-4. eCollection 2010 Nov-Dec.
2
Journal impact factor versus the evidence level of articles published in plastic surgery journals.期刊影响因子与整形外科学杂志发表文章的证据水平的关系。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jun;133(6):1502-1507. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000214.
3
Level of evidence in hand surgery.
手外科的证据水平
BMC Res Notes. 2012 Dec 2;5:665. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-665.
4
Hierarchy of evidence relating to hand surgery in Brazilian orthopedic journals.巴西骨科期刊中与手外科相关的证据等级
Sao Paulo Med J. 2011 Mar;129(2):94-8. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802011000200007.
5
The evolution of the Science Citation Index.《科学引文索引》的演变
Int Microbiol. 2007 Mar;10(1):65-9.
6
Introducing levels of evidence to the journal.向该期刊引入证据级别。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jan;85(1):1-3.
7
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?评估随机临床试验报告的质量:设盲是否必要?
Control Clin Trials. 1996 Feb;17(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4.
8
Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation.作为期刊评价工具的文献计量分析
Science. 1972 Nov 3;178(4060):471-9. doi: 10.1126/science.178.4060.471.