Jia Yun, Zhu Juan, Wu Ying, Fan Wei-Bing, Zhao Gui-Fang, Li Zhong-Hu
Key Laboratory of Resource Biology and Biotechnology in Western China, Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Northwest University, Xi'an, China.
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Aug 28;9:1264. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01264. eCollection 2018.
The effects of mountain uplift and environmental oscillations on nucleotide variability and species divergence remain largely unknown in East Asia. In this study, based on multiple nuclear DNA markers, we investigated the levels and patterns of nucleotide diversity and interspecific divergence in four closely related pines in China, i.e., , , , and . The four pine taxa shared low levels of nucleotide polymorphisms at the species level. had the highest silent nucleotide diversity (π = 0.00661) whereas had the lowest (π = 0.00175), while the levels of genetic polymorphism in (π = 0.00508) and (π = 0.00652) were intermediate between the other two species. Population genetic structure analysis showed that variations primarily existed within populations of the four pine species, presumably due to habitat fragmentation or the island-like distributions of species. Population divergence () analysis showed that the genetic divergence between and was much greater than that between and the other two pines species. Isolation-with-migration analysis suggested that asymmetric gene flow had occurred between any two pairs of pine species. Phylogenetic analyses indicated that the four allied species split into two groups about 1.37 million years ago, where . and . were closer and clustered as sister species, whereas . and . were clustered on another branch. Our results and those obtained in previous studies suggest that mountain uplift and geological climate oscillations may have led to the patterns of genetic divergence and nucleotide variations in these four pine species.
在东亚,山脉隆起和环境振荡对核苷酸变异性和物种分化的影响在很大程度上仍然未知。在本研究中,基于多个核DNA标记,我们调查了中国四种近缘松树,即[具体松树种类1]、[具体松树种类2]、[具体松树种类3]和[具体松树种类4]的核苷酸多样性水平和模式以及种间分化情况。这四种松树类群在物种水平上共享低水平的核苷酸多态性。[具体松树种类1]具有最高的同义核苷酸多样性(π = 0.00661),而[具体松树种类2]最低(π = 0.00175),而[具体松树种类3](π = 0.00508)和[具体松树种类 (π = 0.00652)]的遗传多态性水平介于其他两个物种之间。群体遗传结构分析表明,变异主要存在于这四种松树的种群内部,可能是由于栖息地破碎化或[具体松树种类]物种的岛屿状分布。种群分化([具体分化指标])分析表明,[具体松树种类1]和[具体松树种类2]之间的遗传分化远大于[具体松树种类1]与其他两种松树之间的分化。隔离迁移分析表明,任意两对松树物种之间都发生了不对称的基因流。系统发育分析表明,这四个近缘物种在约137万年前分为两组,其中[具体分组情况1]。[具体松树种类1]和[具体松树种类2]关系更近,聚为姐妹种,而[具体松树种类3]和[具体松树种类4]聚在另一分支上。我们的结果以及先前研究所得结果表明,山脉隆起和地质气候振荡可能导致了这四种松树物种的遗传分化和核苷酸变异模式。