Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Shock. 2019 Sep;52(3):347-352. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001261.
Sepsis-3 consensus suggests "the need to develop similar updated definitions for pediatric populations." Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria are two systems widely used to define the status of infection. However, it is still unclear whether SOFA is more accurate than SIRS in predicting children mortality in low- and middle-income countries. Thus, we validated the accuracy of age-adapted SOFA and SIRS in predicating the poor prognosis of infected children in China's pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).
We performed a retrospective and observational cohort study of children admitted for infection to PICU in the hospital between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2017. The indexes within 24 h after intensive care unit (ICU) admission were analyzed according to age-adapted SOFA and SIRS, and all data were sourced from the hospital's electronic health record database. The prognosis was illustrated with primary outcome and secondary outcome. Primary outcome referred to in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcome to in-hospital mortality or ICU length of stay ≥ 7 days. The predictive power of age-adapted SOFA and SIRS was compared using crude and adjusted area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).
Of 1,831 PICU-admitted children due to infection, 164 (9.0%) experienced primary outcome, and 948 (51.8%) secondary outcome. Of 164 deaths, 65.9% were males (median age of 7.53 months, range of 2.67-41.00 months). Children who scored ≥ 2 in age-adapted SOFA or met two SIRS criteria accounted for 92.5% and 73.3%, respectively. In addition, age-adapted SOFA score of ≥2 predicted adverse outcome more accurately than pediatric SIRS (adjusted AUROC, 0.753; 0.713-0.796 vs. 0.674; 0.631-0.702; P < 0.001).
Compared with SIRS criteria, age-adapted SOFA score of ≥ 2 enjoys a more accuracy in predicting in-hospital mortality of PICU-admitted children, and a higher sensitivity in identifying children with severe infection.
Sepsis-3 共识建议“需要为儿科人群制定类似的更新定义。”序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准是广泛用于定义感染状态的两种系统。然而,SOFA 是否比 SIRS 更能准确预测中低收入国家儿童的死亡率仍不清楚。因此,我们验证了年龄适应的 SOFA 和 SIRS 在预测中国儿科重症监护病房(PICU)感染儿童不良预后方面的准确性。
我们对 2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间因感染入住 PICU 的儿童进行了回顾性观察队列研究。根据年龄适应的 SOFA 和 SIRS 分析入住 ICU 后 24 小时内的指标,所有数据均来自医院的电子健康记录数据库。预后用主要结局和次要结局来表示。主要结局是院内死亡率,次要结局是院内死亡率或 ICU 住院时间≥7 天。使用粗和调整后的接受者操作特征曲线(AUROC)下面积比较年龄适应的 SOFA 和 SIRS 的预测能力。
在 1831 名因感染而入住 PICU 的儿童中,有 164 名(9.0%)发生了主要结局,948 名(51.8%)发生了次要结局。在 164 例死亡中,男性占 65.9%(中位数年龄为 7.53 个月,范围为 2.67-41.00 个月)。年龄适应的 SOFA 评分≥2 或符合两个 SIRS 标准的儿童分别占 92.5%和 73.3%。此外,年龄适应的 SOFA 评分≥2 预测不良结局的准确性高于儿科 SIRS(调整后的 AUROC,0.753;0.713-0.796 与 0.674;0.631-0.702;P<0.001)。
与 SIRS 标准相比,年龄适应的 SOFA 评分≥2 能更准确地预测入住 PICU 儿童的院内死亡率,并且对识别严重感染的儿童具有更高的灵敏度。