• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

边缘性拔牙与非拔牙患者的硬组织和软组织侧貌变化的几何形态测量评估。

A geometric morphometric evaluation of hard and soft tissue profile changes in borderline extraction versus non-extraction patients.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

Center for Advanced Dental Education, Department of Orthodontics, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 2019 May 24;41(3):264-272. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy056.

DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjy056
PMID:30212892
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the hard tissue and facial profile changes in matched extraction and non-extraction Class I patients by the use of geometric morphometrics.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

From a parent sample of 542 Class I patients, previously subjected to discriminant analysis, a subsample of 68 borderline cases was obtained, 34 treated with extraction and 34 without extraction of 4 first premolars. Geometric morphometric methods (Procrustes superimposition and Principal Component Analysis) were applied on cephalometric tracings to assess the validity of the discriminant analysis in successfully identifying a morphologically homogeneous group and to evaluate inter- and intra-group skeletal and facial profile shape changes.

RESULTS

No significant pre-treatment shape difference between the two groups was found, thus validating the discriminant analysis. The non-extraction group showed increase in hard tissue facial height (P < 0.001), with slight lower lip retrusion and upper lip protrusion (P = 0.027). The extraction group showed retraction of the hard tissue and facial profile outline (P < 0.001). Permutation tests for post-treatment inter-group differences resulted in P = 0.054 for the soft tissue outline and P = 0.078 for the hard tissue skeletal component.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence indicates that borderline cases treated with four premolar extractions will exhibit lip retrusion compared to non-extraction treatment.

摘要

目的

运用几何形态测量学评估拔牙和非拔牙矫治的Ⅰ类患者的硬组织和面部侧貌变化。

对象与方法

从先前经过判别分析的 542 例Ⅰ类患者的原始样本中,选取 68 例临界病例作为亚组,其中 34 例接受了 4 颗第一前磨牙的拔牙矫治,34 例接受了非拔牙矫治。通过几何形态测量法(Procrustes 叠加和主成分分析)对头颅侧位片进行分析,以评估判别分析是否能成功识别形态学同质组,并评估组内和组间骨骼和面部轮廓形状的变化。

结果

两组间治疗前的形状差异无统计学意义,从而验证了判别分析的有效性。非拔牙组的硬组织面高增加(P < 0.001),下唇轻度后缩,上唇前突(P = 0.027)。拔牙组的硬组织和面部轮廓外形出现回缩(P < 0.001)。治疗后组间差异的置换检验显示,软组织轮廓的 P 值为 0.054,硬组织骨骼成分的 P 值为 0.078。

结论

有证据表明,与非拔牙矫治相比,接受四颗前磨牙拔牙矫治的临界病例会出现唇部后缩。

相似文献

1
A geometric morphometric evaluation of hard and soft tissue profile changes in borderline extraction versus non-extraction patients.边缘性拔牙与非拔牙患者的硬组织和软组织侧貌变化的几何形态测量评估。
Eur J Orthod. 2019 May 24;41(3):264-272. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy056.
2
Vertical skeletal changes after extraction and non-extraction treatment in matched class I patients identified by a discriminant analysis: cephalometric appraisal and Procrustes superimposition.基于判别分析的匹配Ⅰ类患者拔牙与非拔牙治疗后垂直骨骼变化:头影测量评估与 Procrustes 叠加。
Prog Orthod. 2017 Dec 18;18(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40510-017-0198-5.
3
Profile changes following extraction orthodontic treatment: A comparison of first versus second premolar extraction.正畸拔牙治疗后的牙弓形态变化:第一前磨牙与第二前磨牙拔牙的比较。
Int Orthod. 2018 Mar;16(1):91-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2018.01.017. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
4
Short-term effects of systematic premolar extraction on lip profile, vertical dimension and cephalometric parameters in borderline patients for extraction therapy--a retrospective cohort study.系统前磨牙拔除对边缘性拔牙患者唇型、垂直向和头影测量参数的短期影响——一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 May;20(4):865-74. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1574-5. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
5
Comparative evaluation of soft tissue changes in Class I borderline patients treated with extraction and nonextraction modalities.对采用拔牙和不拔牙矫治方式治疗的Ⅰ类临界病例软组织变化的比较评估。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 Jul-Aug;21(4):50-9. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.050-059.oar.
6
Palatal shape covariation in extraction versus nonextraction borderline patients: A geometric morphometric study.腭部形态变化在拔牙与不拔牙边缘型患者中的差异:一项几何形态测量学研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023 May;163(5):e127-e136. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.02.006. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
7
Soft tissue profile response in extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment.拔牙与非拔牙正畸治疗中的软组织侧貌反应
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2010 Jul;20(7):454-9.
8
Soft-tissue changes in Class II malocclusion patients treated with extractions: a systematic review.拔牙治疗的安氏II类错颌患者的软组织变化:一项系统评价
Eur J Orthod. 2016 Dec;38(6):631-637. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv083. Epub 2015 Nov 29.
9
[Cephalometric comparison of soft-tissue morphology between extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment in borderline cases].[临界病例拔牙与非拔牙正畸治疗软组织形态的头影测量比较]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2004 Dec;36(6):650-4.
10
Cephalometric changes in Class II division 1 patients treated with two maxillary premolars extraction.拔除两颗上颌前磨牙治疗的安氏II类1分类患者的头影测量变化
Dental Press J Orthod. 2013 Jul-Aug;18(4):61-9. doi: 10.1590/s2176-94512013000400010.

引用本文的文献

1
Palatal rugae change shape following orthodontic treatment: a comparison between extraction and non-extraction borderline cases using fractal analysis and 3D superimposition.正畸治疗后腭皱襞形状发生改变:采用分形分析和三维叠加法对拔牙和非拔牙临界病例的比较
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Dec 4;47(1). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae070.
2
Extraction vs nonextraction orthodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.拔牙与不拔牙正畸治疗的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Angle Orthod. 2024 Jan 1;94(1):83-106. doi: 10.2319/021123-98.1.
3
Soft-Tissue Analysis of Different Sagittal Skeletal Patterns Using the Geometric Morphometric Method.
使用几何形态测量法对不同矢状面骨骼类型进行软组织分析
Eur J Dent. 2023 Feb;17(1):97-106. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1743149. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
4
Landmark-based homologous multi-point warping approach to 3D facial recognition using multiple datasets.基于地标点的同源多点变形方法在多数据集三维面部识别中的应用
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2020 Jan 16;6:e249. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.249. eCollection 2020.
5
Soft tissue facial changes among adult females during alignment stage of orthodontic treatment: a 3D geometric morphometric study.正畸治疗排齐阶段成年女性软组织面型变化的三维几何形态测量研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Feb 9;21(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01425-2.
6
Morphometric approach to 3D soft-tissue craniofacial analysis and classification of ethnicity, sex, and age.三维软组织颅面形态分析及种族、性别和年龄分类的方法。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 9;15(4):e0228402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228402. eCollection 2020.
7
3-Dimensional facial expression recognition in human using multi-points warping.利用多点变形进行人类三维面部表情识别。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2019 Dec 2;20(1):619. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-3153-2.