Suppr超能文献

舒尼替尼治疗老年晚期肾细胞癌患者的疗效与安全性

Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in elderly patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

作者信息

Fujita Tetsuo, Hirayama Takahiro, Ishii Daisuke, Matsumoto Kazumasa, Yoshida Kazunari, Iwamura Masatsugu

机构信息

Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-0374, Japan.

出版信息

Mol Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct;9(4):394-398. doi: 10.3892/mco.2018.1684. Epub 2018 Jul 26.

Abstract

Elderly individuals represent a consistent proportion of all cancer patients. However, they are under-represented in clinical trials. The present study evaluated the actual tolerability of sunitinib in elderly Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). A total of 56 consecutive patients with advanced RCC treated with sunitinib were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups according to their age at the time of sunitinib initiation: i) elderly cohort (≥70 years); and ii) younger cohort (<70 years). Disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival and relative dose intensity (RDI) were compared between the two cohorts. The elderly cohort comprised of 14 patients (25.0%), and the younger cohort included 42 patients (75.0%). The elderly cohort had a significantly higher Charlson comorbidity index than the younger cohort (mean, 9.7 vs. 7.9; P<0.0001). Disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were not significantly different. The elderly cohort had a significantly lower RDI than the younger cohort (mean, 51.7 vs. 65.0%; P=0.0340). Thus, treatment with sunitinib is feasible and effective in elderly Japanese patients with advanced RCC. However, the RDI of elderly patients was significantly lower, and a relatively low dose of sunitinib provided optimal therapeutic efficacy.

摘要

老年患者在所有癌症患者中占比稳定。然而,他们在临床试验中的代表性不足。本研究评估了舒尼替尼在老年日本晚期肾细胞癌(RCC)患者中的实际耐受性。共有56例接受舒尼替尼治疗的连续晚期RCC患者入组。根据开始使用舒尼替尼时的年龄将患者分为两组:i)老年组(≥70岁);ii)年轻组(<70岁)。比较了两组之间的疾病控制率、无进展生存期、总生存期和相对剂量强度(RDI)。老年组有14例患者(25.0%),年轻组包括42例患者(75.0%)。老年组的Charlson合并症指数显著高于年轻组(平均值分别为9.7和7.9;P<0.0001)。疾病控制率、无进展生存期和总生存期无显著差异。老年组的RDI显著低于年轻组(平均值分别为51.7%和65.0%;P=0.0340)。因此,舒尼替尼治疗对于老年日本晚期RCC患者是可行且有效的。然而,老年患者的RDI显著较低,相对低剂量的舒尼替尼可提供最佳治疗效果。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Complex Therapeutic Challenge in the Elderly.肾细胞癌:老年人面临的复杂治疗挑战
Cureus. 2022 Jun 26;14(6):e26346. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26346. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Nephrotoxicity of Anti-Angiogenic Therapies.抗血管生成疗法的肾毒性
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Apr 1;11(4):640. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11040640.

本文引用的文献

3
EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update.EAU 指南:肾细胞癌. 2014 年更新版.
Eur Urol. 2015 May;67(5):913-24. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
7
Age-related properties of the tumour vasculature in renal cell carcinoma.肾细胞癌肿瘤血管的年龄相关性。
BJU Int. 2011 Feb;107(3):416-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09569.x. Epub 2010 Aug 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验