Qin Lei, Li Xiang, Li Angie, Cheng Suchun, Qu Jinrong, Reinshagen Katherine, Hu Jiani, Himes Nathan, Lu Gao, Xu Xiaoyin, Young Geoffrey S
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Imaging, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA; Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Department of Radiology, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Transl Oncol. 2018 Dec;11(6):1398-1405. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2018.07.017. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
To validate Gaussian normalized cerebral blood volume (GN-nCBV) by association with overall survival (OS) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients and compare this association with current standard white matter normalized cerebral blood volume (WN-nCBV).
We retrieved spin-echo echo-planar dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI acquired after maximal resection and prior to radiation therapy between 2006 and 2011 in 51 adult patients (28 male, 23 female; age 23-87 years) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Software code was developed in house to perform Gaussian normalization of CBV to the standard deviation of the whole brain CBV. Three expert readers manually selected regions of interest in tumor and normal-appearing white matter on CBV maps. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves associating nCBV with 15-month OS were calculated for both GN-nCBV and WN-nCBV. Reproducibility and interoperator variability were compared using within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
GN-nCBV ICC (≥0.82) and wCV (≤21%) were superior to WN-nCBV ICC (0.54-0.55) and wCV (≥46%). The area under the ROC curve analysis demonstrated both GN-nCBV and WN-nCBV to be good predictors of OS, but GN-nCBV was consistently superior, although the difference was not statistically significant.
GN-nCBV has a slightly better association with clinical gold standard OS than conventional WM-nCBV in our glioblastoma patient cohort. This equivalent or superior validity, combined with the advantages of higher reproducibility, lower interoperator variability, and easier automation, makes GN-nCBV superior to WM-nCBV for clinical and research use in glioma patients. We recommend widespread adoption and incorporation of GN-nCBV into commercial dynamic susceptibility contrast processing software.
通过与新诊断的胶质母细胞瘤患者的总生存期(OS)相关联来验证高斯归一化脑血容量(GN-nCBV),并将这种关联与当前标准的白质归一化脑血容量(WN-nCBV)进行比较。
我们检索了2006年至2011年间51例新诊断的胶质母细胞瘤成年患者(28例男性,23例女性;年龄23 - 87岁)在最大切除术后和放疗前获得的自旋回波平面回波动态磁敏感对比增强磁共振成像。在内部开发了软件代码,以将脑血容量(CBV)进行高斯归一化处理,使其相对于全脑CBV的标准差。三位专家读者在CBV图上手动选择肿瘤和外观正常白质的感兴趣区域。计算了GN-nCBV和WN-nCBV与15个月总生存期相关的受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线。使用受试者内变异系数(wCV)和组内相关系数(ICC)比较了可重复性和操作者间变异性。
GN-nCBV的ICC(≥0.82)和wCV(≤21%)优于WN-nCBV的ICC(0.54 - 0.55)和wCV(≥46%)。ROC曲线下面积分析表明,GN-nCBV和WN-nCBV都是总生存期的良好预测指标,但GN-nCBV始终更优,尽管差异无统计学意义。
在我们的胶质母细胞瘤患者队列中,GN-nCBV与临床金标准总生存期的关联略优于传统的白质归一化脑血容量(WM-nCBV)。这种等效或更优的有效性,再加上更高的可重复性、更低的操作者间变异性以及更容易自动化的优点,使得GN-nCBV在胶质瘤患者的临床和研究应用中优于WM-nCBV。我们建议广泛采用GN-nCBV并将其纳入商业动态磁敏感对比处理软件中。