Suzuki Kaima, Kato Yuji, Hayashi Takeshi, Maruyama Hajime, Kikkawa Yuichiro, Kurita Hiroki
Department of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Japan.
Department of Neurology and Cerebrovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Japan.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018 Nov;174:63-67. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
The effect of a direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) dose on intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) severity and outcome remains unclear. The aim of this study is to clarify the frequency of off-label dosing of DOAC treatments in ICH patients and compare clinical characteristics.
We studied 43 patients with ICH who were treated with DOAC for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation before the onset of ICH. DOAC treatments were categorized into three groups based on the following doses: optimal dose, under-dose, and overdose.
Overall, 31 patients were optimally dosed, 10 were under-dosed, and 2 were overdosed. CHADS and CHADS-VASc scores were the highest in the overdose group (median, 4, 6, respectively) and the lowest in the optimal dose group (median, 2, 4, respectively) (p = 0.006, p = 0.005, respectively). ICH severity measured using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores was the highest in the overdose group (median, 26.5) and the lowest in the under-dose group (median, 6.5) (p = 0.244). Larger initial hematoma volume was observed in the overdose group. The ratio of good outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 2) was higher in the under-dose group (40%) than the other groups, but this difference was not significant.
Our study shows only a few patients received overdosing of a DOAC before the onset of ICH, and they were associated with poorer functional outcomes. Conversely, under-dosing was associated with better functional outcomes than the other groups.
直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)剂量对脑出血(ICH)严重程度和预后的影响尚不清楚。本研究的目的是明确脑出血患者中DOAC治疗的超说明书用药频率,并比较临床特征。
我们研究了43例脑出血患者,这些患者在脑出血发作前因非瓣膜性心房颤动接受DOAC治疗。根据以下剂量将DOAC治疗分为三组:最佳剂量、剂量不足和过量。
总体而言,31例患者剂量最佳,10例剂量不足,2例过量。CHADS和CHADS-VASc评分在过量组最高(中位数分别为4、6),在最佳剂量组最低(中位数分别为2、4)(p分别为0.006、0.005)。使用美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分测量的脑出血严重程度在过量组最高(中位数为26.5),在剂量不足组最低(中位数为6.5)(p = 0.244)。过量组观察到初始血肿体积更大。剂量不足组良好预后(改良Rankin量表评分≤2)的比例(40%)高于其他组,但差异无统计学意义。
我们的研究表明,只有少数患者在脑出血发作前接受了过量的DOAC治疗,且他们的功能预后较差。相反,与其他组相比,剂量不足与更好的功能预后相关。