Cardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Cardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Sep 15;122(6):922-928. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.06.017. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
Although statin use in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is mandatory, it has been suggested to be associated with new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM). In real world practice, moderate-intensity statin therapy is more commonly used than high-intensity statin therapy. In this study, we investigated the impact of moderate-intensity pitavastatin (2 to 4 mg) compared with moderate-intensity atorvastatin (10 to 20 mg) and rosuvastatin (5 to 10 mg) on the development of NODM during a follow-up period of up to 3years. Between November 2011 and May 2015, 2001 patients with AMI who did not have diabetes mellitus were investigated. The cumulative incidence of NODM was evaluated in all groups. To adjust for potential confounders, multinomial propensity scores were used. Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the hazard ratio of NODM in the atorvastatin and rosuvastatin groups compared with pitavastatin group. The cumulative incidence of NODM was significantly lower in pitavastatin group compared with the atorvastatin and rosuvastatin groups (3.0% vs 8.4% vs 10.4%, respectively; Log-rank p value = 0.001). After weighting the baseline characteristics of the 3 statin groups by multinomial propensity scores, atorvastatin (hazard ratio: 2.615, 95% confidence interval: 1.163 to 5.879) and rosuvastatin (hazard ratio: 3.906, 95% confidence interval: 1.756 to 8.688) were found to be associated with a higher incidence of NODM compared with pitavastatin therapy on multivariable analysis. Moderate-intensity pitavastatin therapy is associated with a lower incidence of NODM in patients with AMI andhas similar clinical outcomes to moderate-intensity atorvastatin and rosuvastatin therapy.
虽然在急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者中使用他汀类药物是强制性的,但有研究表明其与新发糖尿病(NODM)相关。在实际临床实践中,中等强度的他汀类药物治疗比高强度他汀类药物治疗更为常见。在这项研究中,我们研究了中等强度匹伐他汀(2 至 4 毫克)与中等强度阿托伐他汀(10 至 20 毫克)和瑞舒伐他汀(5 至 10 毫克)相比,在长达 3 年的随访期间对 NODM 发展的影响。在 2011 年 11 月至 2015 年 5 月期间,调查了 2001 名患有 AMI 且没有糖尿病的患者。评估了所有组别的 NODM 累积发生率。为了调整潜在的混杂因素,使用了多项倾向评分。Cox 比例风险模型用于评估与匹伐他汀组相比,阿托伐他汀和瑞舒伐他汀组的 NODM 风险比。与阿托伐他汀和瑞舒伐他汀组相比,匹伐他汀组的 NODM 累积发生率明显较低(分别为 3.0%、8.4%和 10.4%;Log-rank p 值=0.001)。通过多项倾向评分加权调整 3 种他汀类药物组的基线特征后,阿托伐他汀(风险比:2.615,95%置信区间:1.163 至 5.879)和瑞舒伐他汀(风险比:3.906,95%置信区间:1.756 至 8.688)与匹伐他汀治疗相比,多变量分析显示与 NODM 发生率升高相关。中等强度匹伐他汀治疗与 AMI 患者的 NODM 发生率较低相关,与中等强度阿托伐他汀和瑞舒伐他汀治疗具有相似的临床结局。