• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

惩教机构囚犯应对压力及生活质量感

Coping with stress and the sense of quality of life in inmates of correctional facilities.

作者信息

Skowroński Bartlomiej Łukasz, Talik Elżbieta

机构信息

Instytut Profilaktyki Społecznej i Resocjalizacji, Uniwersytet Warszawski.

Instytut Psychologii, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski.

出版信息

Psychiatr Pol. 2018 Jun 30;52(3):525-542. doi: 10.12740/PP/77901.

DOI:10.12740/PP/77901
PMID:30218567
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to examine the differences between groups of prison inmates distinguished according to the sense of quality of life in terms of their ways of coping with stress.

METHODS

In order to verify the research hypotheses, the following instruments were used: (1) The sense of quality of life Questionnaire (SQLQ) by M. Straś-Romanowska (2007) and (2) the COPE Inventory by Carver, Scheier and Weintraub (1989).

RESULTS

The results of the presented research have confirmed that the ways of coping with stress used by prison inmates are related to the sense of quality of life. This conclusion applies not only to overall sense of quality of life but also to all of its dimensions: psychophysical, psychosocial, personal, and metaphysical one. According to the assumed hypothesis, people with a high level of overall quality of life significantly more often than people with a low level of quality of life prefer active coping strategies, including strategies such as: Active coping, Planning, Searching for instrumental support, Searching for emotional support, Positive revaluation and development. Asimilar conclusion with minor modifications also applies to other dimensions of quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, the use of constructive ways of coping with stress - based on seeking support, personal activity in coping with problems and drawing conclusions from wrong life decisions - is related to higher level of quality of life.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在考察根据生活质量感区分的监狱服刑人员群体在应对压力方式上的差异。

方法

为验证研究假设,使用了以下工具:(1)M. Straś-Romanowska(2007年)编制的生活质量感问卷(SQLQ),以及(2)Carver、Scheier和Weintraub(1989年)编制的应对方式量表。

结果

本研究结果证实,监狱服刑人员应对压力的方式与生活质量感相关。这一结论不仅适用于总体生活质量感,也适用于其所有维度:身心维度、心理社会维度、个人维度和形而上学维度。根据假设,总体生活质量水平高的人比生活质量水平低的人更频繁地偏好积极应对策略,包括以下策略:积极应对、计划、寻求工具性支持、寻求情感支持、积极重新评价和成长。类似的结论经轻微修改后也适用于生活质量的其他维度。

结论

因此,采用基于寻求支持、应对问题时的个人活动以及从错误生活决策中吸取教训的建设性应对压力方式,与更高的生活质量水平相关。

相似文献

1
Coping with stress and the sense of quality of life in inmates of correctional facilities.惩教机构囚犯应对压力及生活质量感
Psychiatr Pol. 2018 Jun 30;52(3):525-542. doi: 10.12740/PP/77901.
2
The Sense of Quality of Life and Religious Strategies of Coping with Stress in Prison Inmates.监狱服刑人员的生活质量感及应对压力的宗教策略
J Relig Health. 2018 Jun;57(3):915-937. doi: 10.1007/s10943-017-0455-4.
3
Psychosocial Quality of Life and Its' Correlates in People Serving Prison Sentences in Penitentiary Institutions.服刑人员的社会心理生活质量及其相关因素。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2021 Apr;65(5):590-612. doi: 10.1177/0306624X20944685. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
4
[Burnout and victimisation: impact of inmates' aggression towards prison guards].职业倦怠与受侵害:囚犯对狱警攻击行为的影响
Encephale. 2011 Sep;37(4):284-92. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2010.08.006. Epub 2010 Oct 18.
5
Quality of Life and Its Correlates in People Serving Prison Sentences in Penitentiary Institutions.服刑人员的生活质量及其相关因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 9;18(4):1655. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041655.
6
[Emotional self-control, coping with stress and psycho-physical well-being of prison officers].[监狱工作人员的情绪自我控制、应对压力与身心健康]
Med Pr. 2015;66(3):373-82. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.00182.
7
The impact of a sense of self-efficacy on the level of stress and the ways of coping with difficult situations in Polish nursing students.自我效能感对波兰护理专业学生压力水平及应对困境方式的影响。
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Oct;45:102-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
8
Ways of coping and involvement in prison violence.应对方式及参与监狱暴力的情况。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2015 Apr;59(4):359-83. doi: 10.1177/0306624X13510275. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
9
The quality of life, resources, and coping during the first weeks of the COVID‑19 pandemic in people seeking psychological counselling before the pandemic.在大流行前寻求心理咨询的人在 COVID-19 大流行的最初几周期间的生活质量、资源和应对情况。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2021 May 27;34(2):275-287. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01700. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
10
Anxiety and styles of coping with occupational stress resulting from work with 'dangerous' prisoners in prison service officers.监狱服务人员与“危险”囚犯工作所产生的职业压力的焦虑及应对方式
Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2015 Oct;27(5):297-306. doi: 10.1017/neu.2015.31. Epub 2015 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychological stressors of imprisonment and coping of older incarcerated persons: a qualitative interview study.监禁的心理压力源与老年在押人员的应对方式:一项定性访谈研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 27;25(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21452-w.
2
Quality of life and prosocial or antisocial coping with resource deprivation: A cross-sectional study of people at risk of social exclusion.生活质量与资源匮乏时的亲社会或反社会应对方式:社会排斥风险人群的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 28;17(9):e0275234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275234. eCollection 2022.
3
Determinants of Quality of Life in the COVID-19 Pandemic Situation among Persons Using Psychological Help at Various Stages of the Pandemic.
新冠肺炎大流行期间使用心理援助人员的生活质量在大流行各阶段的决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 16;19(10):6023. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106023.
4
Intensification of Type D Personality Traits and Coping Strategies of People Staying in Polish Penitentiary Institutions-Cross-Sectional Study.波兰监狱机构中人员的 D 型人格特质强化与应对策略的横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 17;19(4):2301. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042301.
5
Quality of Life and Its Correlates in People Serving Prison Sentences in Penitentiary Institutions.服刑人员的生活质量及其相关因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 9;18(4):1655. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041655.