• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹佛急诊创伤器官衰竭评分预测成人创伤患者的医疗资源利用。

Denver ED Trauma Organ Failure Score predicts healthcare resource utilization in adult trauma patients.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;37(6):1108-1113. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.08.073. Epub 2018 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2018.08.073
PMID:30219615
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6395524/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early identification of trauma patients who need specialized healthcare resources may facilitate goal-directed resuscitation and effective secondary triage.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate associations between Denver Emergency Department (ED) Trauma Organ Failure (TOF) Score and healthcare resource utilization.

METHODS

Retrospective study of adult trauma patients at Denver Health Medical Center. The outcome was resource utilization including: intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, procedures, and costs. Multivariable regression analyses were used to estimate associations between moderate- or high-risk patients, as determined by the Denver ED TOF Score, and healthcare resource utilization.

RESULTS

We included 3000 patients with a median age of 42 (IQR 27-56) years, 71% male, median injury severity score 9 (IQR 5-16), and 83% blunt mechanism. Among the cohort, 1379 patients (46%) were admitted to the ICU and 122 (4%) died. The adjusted relative risk for high- and moderate-risk as compared to low risk for number of procedures performed was 2.31 (95% CI 2.07-2.57) and 1.80 (95% CI 1.59-2.03) respectively; ICU LOS was 2.87 (95% CI 2.70-3.05) and 1.71 (95% CI 1.60-1.83) respectively; hospital LOS was 3.33 (95% CI 3.21-3.45) and 1.97 (95% CI 1.90-2.05) respectively. The adjusted geometric mean for high-, moderate-, and low-risk for costs was $48,881 (95% CI $43,799-$54,552), $27,890 (95% CI $25,460-$30,551), and $12,983 (95% CI $12,493-$13,492), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Denver ED TOF Score predicts healthcare resource utilization, and is a useful bedside tool to identify patients early after injury that are likely to require significant healthcare resources and specialized trauma care.

摘要

背景

早期识别需要专科医疗资源的创伤患者,有助于目标导向复苏和有效的二次分诊。

目的

评估丹佛急诊部(ED)创伤器官衰竭(TOF)评分与医疗资源利用之间的关系。

方法

这是丹佛健康医疗中心成年创伤患者的回顾性研究。结局为资源利用,包括:重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间(LOS)、医院 LOS、操作和费用。多变量回归分析用于估计由丹佛 ED TOF 评分确定的中危或高危患者与医疗资源利用之间的关系。

结果

共纳入 3000 例患者,中位年龄 42(IQR 27-56)岁,71%为男性,损伤严重程度评分中位数 9(IQR 5-16),83%为钝性机制。队列中,1379 例(46%)患者收入 ICU,122 例(4%)死亡。与低危相比,高危和中危患者进行操作的相对风险分别为 2.31(95%CI 2.07-2.57)和 1.80(95%CI 1.59-2.03);ICU LOS 分别为 2.87(95%CI 2.70-3.05)和 1.71(95%CI 1.60-1.83);医院 LOS 分别为 3.33(95%CI 3.21-3.45)和 1.97(95%CI 1.90-2.05)。高、中、低风险患者的调整后几何平均值为 48881 美元(95%CI 43799-54552)、27890 美元(95%CI 25460-30551)和 12983 美元(95%CI 12493-13492)。

结论

丹佛 ED TOF 评分预测医疗资源利用,是一种有用的床边工具,可在受伤后早期识别可能需要大量医疗资源和专科创伤护理的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9f/6395524/12e4b40999a5/nihms-1506600-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9f/6395524/6052d34cefeb/nihms-1506600-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9f/6395524/12e4b40999a5/nihms-1506600-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9f/6395524/6052d34cefeb/nihms-1506600-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9f/6395524/12e4b40999a5/nihms-1506600-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Denver ED Trauma Organ Failure Score predicts healthcare resource utilization in adult trauma patients.丹佛急诊创伤器官衰竭评分预测成人创伤患者的医疗资源利用。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;37(6):1108-1113. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.08.073. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
2
Denver ED Trauma Organ Failure Score outperforms traditional methods of risk stratification in trauma.丹佛急诊创伤器官衰竭评分在创伤风险分层方面优于传统方法。
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Oct;33(10):1440-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
3
Validation of the Denver Emergency Department Trauma Organ Failure Score to Predict Post-Injury Multiple Organ Failure.验证丹佛急诊科创伤器官衰竭评分以预测伤后多器官功能衰竭。
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jan;222(1):73-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.10.010. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
4
Emergency department length of stay in critical nonoperative trauma.危急非手术创伤患者在急诊科的留观时间。
J Surg Res. 2017 Jun 15;214:102-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.079. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
5
"One-way-street" streamlined admission of critically ill trauma patients reduces emergency department length of stay.“单行道”式优化流程对危重症创伤患者的收治可缩短急诊科停留时间。
Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;12(7):1019-1024. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1511-x. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
6
Out-of-Hospital ICU Transfers to an Oncological Referral Center: Characteristics, Resource Utilization, and Patient Outcomes.院外 ICU 转入肿瘤转诊中心:特征、资源利用和患者结局。
J Intensive Care Med. 2019 Jan;34(1):55-61. doi: 10.1177/0885066616686536. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
7
The impact of implementing a 24/7 open trauma bed protocol in the surgical intensive care unit on throughput and outcomes.24/7 开放创伤床位协议在外科重症监护病房对吞吐量和结果的影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1):97-101. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829849e5.
8
Prediction of postinjury multiple-organ failure in the emergency department: development of the Denver Emergency Department Trauma Organ Failure score.预测急诊科创伤后多器官衰竭:丹佛急诊科创伤器官衰竭评分的制定。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jan;76(1):140-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182a99da4.
9
A clinical practice guideline using percentage of predicted forced vital capacity improves resource allocation for rib fracture patients.采用预计用力肺活量百分比的临床实践指南可改善肋骨骨折患者的资源分配。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 May 1;90(5):769-775. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003083.
10
Survival outcomes after prolonged intensive care unit length of stay among trauma patients: The evidence for never giving up.创伤患者在重症监护病房长时间住院后的生存结局:永不放弃的证据。
Surgery. 2016 Sep;160(3):771-80. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.024. Epub 2016 Jun 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the Denver Emergency Department Trauma Organ Failure Score to Predict Post-Injury Multiple Organ Failure.验证丹佛急诊科创伤器官衰竭评分以预测伤后多器官功能衰竭。
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jan;222(1):73-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.10.010. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
2
Epidemiology and risk factors of multiple-organ failure after multiple trauma: an analysis of 31,154 patients from the TraumaRegister DGU.多发伤后多器官衰竭的流行病学和危险因素:来自创伤登记处 DGU 的 31154 例患者的分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Apr;76(4):921-7; discussion 927-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000199.
3
Prediction of postinjury multiple-organ failure in the emergency department: development of the Denver Emergency Department Trauma Organ Failure score.
预测急诊科创伤后多器官衰竭:丹佛急诊科创伤器官衰竭评分的制定。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jan;76(1):140-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182a99da4.
4
Trauma intensive care unit survival: how good is an educated guess?创伤重症监护病房的生存率:凭经验猜测的准确性如何?
J Trauma. 2010 Jun;68(6):1279-87; discussion 1287-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181de3b99.
5
Reduction in mortality of severely injured patients in Germany.德国严重创伤患者死亡率降低。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008 Mar;105(13):225-31. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2008.0225. Epub 2008 Mar 28.
6
Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.研究电子数据采集(REDCap)——一种用于提供转化研究信息学支持的元数据驱动方法和工作流程。
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
7
Advanced modeling strategies in emergency medicine research: is the pendulum swinging?急诊医学研究中的先进建模策略:钟摆正在摆动吗?
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Oct;52(4):365-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.01.342. Epub 2008 Apr 3.
8
Using information on preexisting conditions to predict mortality from traumatic injury.利用既往病症信息预测创伤性损伤导致的死亡率。
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Oct;52(4):356-364.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.09.007. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
9
Detecting the blind spot: complications in the trauma registry and trauma quality improvement.发现盲点:创伤登记与创伤质量改进中的并发症
Surgery. 2007 Oct;142(4):439-48; discussion 448-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.07.002.
10
The Injury Severity Score or the New Injury Severity Score for predicting intensive care unit admission and hospital length of stay?用于预测重症监护病房入住率和住院时间的损伤严重程度评分还是新损伤严重程度评分?
Injury. 2005 Apr;36(4):477-83. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2004.09.039. Epub 2005 Jan 22.