Suppr超能文献

身体所有权与触觉缺失:探索手部周围空间内外的橡胶手现象。

Body ownership and the absence of touch: approaching the rubber hand inside and outside peri-hand space.

作者信息

Smit M, Brummelman J T H, Keizer A, van der Smagt M J, Dijkerman H C, van der Ham I J M

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2018 Dec;236(12):3251-3265. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5361-9. Epub 2018 Sep 15.

Abstract

It is widely accepted that the integration of visual and tactile information is a necessity to induce ownership over a rubber hand. This idea has recently been challenged by Ferri et al. (Proc R Soc B 280:1-7, 2013), as they found that sense of ownership was evident by mere expectation of touch. In our study, we aimed to further investigate this finding, by studying whether the mere potential for touch yields a sense of ownership similar in magnitude to that resulting from actually being touched. We conducted two experiments. In the first experiment, our set-up was the classical horizontal set-up (similar to Botvinick and Cohen, Nature 391:756, 1998). Sixty-three individuals were included and performed the classical conditions (synchronous, asynchronous), an approached but not touched (potential for touch), and a 'visual only' condition. In the second experiment, we controlled for differences between the current set-up and the vertical set-up used by Ferri et al. (Proc R Soc B 280:1-7, 2013). Fifteen individuals were included and performed a synchronous and various approaching conditions [i.e., vertical approach, horizontal approach, and a control approach (no hands)]. In our first experiment, we found that approaching the rubber hand neither induced a larger proprioceptive drift nor a stronger subjective sense of ownership than asynchronous stimulation did. Generally, our participants gained most sense of ownership in the synchronous condition, followed by the visual only condition. When using a vertical set-up (second experiment), we confirmed previous suggestions that tactile expectation was able to induce embodiment over a foreign hand, similar in magnitude to actual touch, but only when the real and rubber hand were aligned on the vertical axis, thus along the trajectory of the approaching stimulus. These results indicate that our brain uses bottom-up sensory information, as well as top-down predictions for building a representation of our body.

摘要

人们普遍认为,视觉和触觉信息的整合是引发对橡胶手的所有权感的必要条件。这一观点最近受到了费里等人(《英国皇家学会学报B》280:1 - 7,2013年)的挑战,因为他们发现,仅仅是对触摸的预期就能明显产生所有权感。在我们的研究中,我们旨在通过研究仅仅是触摸的可能性是否会产生与实际被触摸时相似程度的所有权感,来进一步探究这一发现。我们进行了两项实验。在第一个实验中,我们的设置是经典的水平设置(类似于博特温尼克和科恩,《自然》391:756,1998年)。纳入了63名个体,他们进行了经典条件(同步、异步)、接近但未触摸(触摸可能性)以及“仅视觉”条件。在第二个实验中,我们控制了当前设置与费里等人(《英国皇家学会学报B》280:1 - 7,2013年)使用的垂直设置之间的差异。纳入了15名个体,他们进行了同步和各种接近条件[即垂直接近、水平接近以及对照接近(无手)]。在我们的第一个实验中,我们发现接近橡胶手与异步刺激相比,既没有引发更大的本体感觉漂移,也没有产生更强的主观所有权感。一般来说,我们的参与者在同步条件下获得的所有权感最强,其次是仅视觉条件。当使用垂直设置(第二个实验)时,我们证实了之前的观点,即触觉预期能够引发对异手的身体化感知,其程度与实际触摸相似,但前提是真实手和橡胶手在垂直轴上对齐,即沿着接近刺激的轨迹。这些结果表明,我们的大脑利用自下而上的感官信息以及自上而下的预测来构建我们身体的表征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/763a/6267689/d9327d3f37c5/221_2018_5361_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验