• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[骨水泥强化治疗椎体溶骨性转移瘤:术后CT评估]

[Cement augmentation for vertebral osteolytic metastatic lesions: an evaluation on postoperative CT].

作者信息

Sun F H, He S C, Zhu H D, Fang W, Du R J, Li S S, Guo J H, Deng G, Qin Y L, Zhu G Y, Teng G J

机构信息

Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Sep 4;98(33):2661-2665. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2018.33.010.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2018.33.010
PMID:30220155
Abstract

To evaluate the effectiveness of cement augmentation on the osteolytic lesion in patients with vertebral metastasis. A total of consecutive 132 patients with 268 vertebral metastatic lesions treated with PVP from January 2008 to December 2016 in Zhongda Hospital were enrolled in this study. Retrospective analysis of preoperative, postoperative 3 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and ≥ 18 months imaging data on CT, the local control and progression of the tumor were evaluated by MDA response criteria. The local control rates were compared between the groups with the different rate of cement filling by -test. Vertebroplasty procedures were performed successfully in all 268 vertebrae under DSA guidance, and the mean volume of PMMA injected in each vertebra was 0.7-8.5(3.9±1.5)ml.The rate of local control at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and ≥18 months after PVP was respectively 98.9%, 95.1%, 91.8%, and 85.2%, the difference was statistically significant(all <0.05). The local control rate showed a statistically significant relationship to the groups with the rate of cement filling at 6 months, 12 months and ≥18 months after PVP, but there was no statistical difference at postoperative 3 months. The rate of local control was higher in 68 patients with lung or gastrointestinal cancer than in 17 patients with liver or kidney cancer at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months, the difference was statistically significant (<0.05). Cement augmentation has a local anti-tumor effect on vertebral osteolytic metastatic lesion, and the anti-tumor effect will decrease as the follow-up time extended.

摘要

评估骨水泥强化对椎体转移瘤患者溶骨性病变的疗效。选取2008年1月至2016年12月在中大医院接受经皮椎体成形术(PVP)治疗的132例连续患者,共268个椎体转移瘤病灶纳入本研究。回顾性分析术前、术后3天、3个月、6个月、12个月及≥18个月的CT影像资料,采用改良实体瘤疗效评价标准(MDA)评估肿瘤的局部控制情况及进展。通过t检验比较不同骨水泥填充率组间的局部控制率。所有268个椎体均在DSA引导下成功完成椎体成形术,每个椎体注入聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)的平均体积为0.7 - 8.5(3.9±1.5)ml。PVP术后3个月、6个月、12个月及≥18个月的局部控制率分别为98.9%、95.1%、91.8%和85.2%,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。PVP术后6个月、12个月及≥18个月时,局部控制率与骨水泥填充率组间存在统计学差异,但术后3个月无统计学差异。在3个月、6个月和12个月时,68例肺癌或胃肠道癌患者的局部控制率高于17例肝癌或肾癌患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。骨水泥强化对椎体溶骨性转移瘤有局部抗肿瘤作用,且抗肿瘤作用会随着随访时间延长而降低。

相似文献

1
[Cement augmentation for vertebral osteolytic metastatic lesions: an evaluation on postoperative CT].[骨水泥强化治疗椎体溶骨性转移瘤:术后CT评估]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Sep 4;98(33):2661-2665. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2018.33.010.
2
Repeated percutaneous vertebroplasty for refracture of cemented vertebrae.经皮椎体成形术治疗骨水泥强化椎体再骨折。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011 Jul;131(7):927-33. doi: 10.1007/s00402-010-1236-7. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
3
[Correlation analysis of cement leakage with volume ratio of intravertebral bone cement to vertebral body and vertebral body wall incompetence in percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures].[经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折中骨水泥渗漏与椎体内骨水泥与椎体体积比及椎体壁功能不全的相关性分析]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Nov;28(11):1358-63.
4
A clinical comparative study on low versus medium viscosity polymethylmetacrylate bone cement in percutaneous vertebroplasty: viscosity associated with cement leakage.经皮椎体成形术低黏度与中黏度聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯骨水泥的临床对比研究:黏度与水泥渗漏相关。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Sep 15;35(20):E1037-44. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ddd262.
5
[Percutaneous vertebroplasty for treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a retrospective analysis of clinical efficacy].经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折疼痛的回顾性临床疗效分析
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Jul 15;94(27):2119-22.
6
Risk Factors for Local Bone Destruction Progression in Palliative Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Vertebral Metastases and the Significance of Bone Cement Filling Rates.经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗椎体转移瘤局部骨破坏进展的危险因素及骨水泥填充率的意义。
Pain Physician. 2021 Jan;24(1):E101-E109.
7
[Cement leakages in percutaneous vertebroplasty:analysis of postoperative computed tomography].经皮椎体成形术中的骨水泥渗漏:术后计算机断层扫描分析
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012 Feb 7;92(5):299-302.
8
[Clinical comparison of polymethylmethacrylate and bone cement in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a retrospective study].聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯与骨水泥治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的临床比较:一项回顾性研究
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017 Apr 18;49(2):267-273.
9
[Effect of different bone cement dispersion types in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture].[不同骨水泥弥散类型在骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折治疗中的作用]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2017 May 25;30(5):446-452. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2017.05.011.
10
[COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN PERCUTANEOUS VERTEBROPLASTY AND PERCUTANEOUS KYPHOPLASTY FOR TREATMENT OF OSTEOPOROTIC VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURE WITH INTRAVERTEBRAL VACUUM CLEFT].经皮椎体成形术与经皮后凸成形术治疗伴椎体内真空裂隙的骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 8;30(9):1104-1110. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.20160225.

引用本文的文献

1
A retrospective cohort study on the efficacy and safety of percutaneous vertebroplasty combined with bone-filling mesh container in vertebral metastases with posterior wall defect.经皮椎体成形术联合骨填充网袋治疗后壁缺损椎体转移瘤疗效及安全性的回顾性队列研究
Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 12;13:1312491. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1312491. eCollection 2023.
2
[Expert Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Bone Metastasis in Lung Cancer (2019 Version)].《肺癌骨转移诊疗专家共识(2019年版)》
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2019 Apr 20;22(4):187-207. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2019.04.01.