• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体和地理空间特征与城市少数族裔人群使用和不使用粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)进行结直肠癌筛查的关系。

Individual and Geospatial Characteristics Associated With Use and Nonuse of the Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) for Colorectal Cancer Screening in an Urban Minority Population.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Brooklyn Hospital Center.

Cancer Services Program of Brooklyn, Brooklyn, NY.

出版信息

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov/Dec;53(10):744-749. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001132.

DOI:10.1097/MCG.0000000000001132
PMID:30222644
Abstract

PURPOSE

Initiatives by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as well as the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable aim to increase the rate of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We assess individual and geographic characteristics associated fecal immunochemical test (FIT) CRC screening over 3 years.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 1500 FIT kits which were mailed or opportunistically handed to eligible participants in Brooklyn, New York from January 2014 to December 2016. Eligibility criteria included increased risk for colon cancer, uninsured or underinsured, and a minimum age of 50 years to warrant CRC screening. We looked at the association of individual demographic characteristics and FIT screening by logistic regression using SPPS version 23 software. In addition, using ArcGIS, we coded patients address and layered census tract population information to find associations.

RESULTS

In total, 1367 Cancer Services Participants met our study criteria. The study sample was predominantly female (95.2%) and minority (46% African American, 24.7% Hispanic, 17.3% Caucasian, 11.4% Asian) and on average 59 years old (SD, 5.7). A large majority (73%) had household incomes below $20,000/year. Approximately half (49.9%) of all Cancer Services Participants returned their FIT kit. In participants who did not return their FIT kit, the majority were African American (41%), followed by Hispanics (26.5%), Caucasians (20.6%), and Asians (11.8%). Multivariable logistic regression showed that a screening history of prior colonoscopy or FIT, gender, ethnicity, and educational attainment were significantly associated with FIT CRC screening uptake (P<0.05). Geospatial mapping showed clusters of low screening uptake in areas of high poverty. Hot-spot analysis identified areas of significant vulnerability.

CONCLUSIONS

FIT uptake remains suboptimal. Individual predictors as well as area poverty is associated with low screening uptake. Geospatial mapping is an effective tool for evaluating CRC screening uptake.

摘要

目的

疾病控制与预防中心以及国家结直肠癌圆桌会议的倡议旨在提高结直肠癌(CRC)筛查率。我们评估了在 3 年内与粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)CRC 筛查相关的个体和地理特征。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象为 2014 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月期间,在纽约布鲁克林通过邮寄或偶然方式向符合条件的参与者发放的 1500 份 FIT 试剂盒。纳入标准包括结直肠癌风险增加、未参保或参保不足、年龄至少 50 岁以进行 CRC 筛查。我们使用 SPPS 版本 23 软件通过逻辑回归检查个体人口统计学特征与 FIT 筛查的关联。此外,我们使用 ArcGIS 对患者的地址进行编码,并分层人口普查区的人口信息,以寻找关联。

结果

共有 1367 名癌症服务参与者符合我们的研究标准。研究样本主要为女性(95.2%)和少数族裔(46%为非裔美国人,24.7%为西班牙裔,17.3%为白人,11.4%为亚裔),平均年龄为 59 岁(标准差,5.7 岁)。绝大多数(73%)的家庭收入低于 20000 美元/年。大约一半(49.9%)的癌症服务参与者退回了他们的 FIT 试剂盒。在未退回 FIT 试剂盒的参与者中,大多数是非裔美国人(41%),其次是西班牙裔(26.5%)、白人(20.6%)和亚裔(11.8%)。多变量逻辑回归显示,既往结肠镜检查或 FIT 筛查史、性别、族裔和教育程度与 FIT CRC 筛查的采用显著相关(P<0.05)。地理空间映射显示,在贫困程度较高的地区,筛查率较低。热点分析确定了具有显著脆弱性的区域。

结论

FIT 利用率仍然不理想。个体预测因素以及地区贫困与低筛查率有关。地理空间映射是评估 CRC 筛查利用率的有效工具。

相似文献

1
Individual and Geospatial Characteristics Associated With Use and Nonuse of the Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) for Colorectal Cancer Screening in an Urban Minority Population.个体和地理空间特征与城市少数族裔人群使用和不使用粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)进行结直肠癌筛查的关系。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov/Dec;53(10):744-749. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001132.
2
Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening and Risk of Colorectal Cancer Death.粪便免疫化学试验筛查与结直肠癌死亡风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2423671. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.23671.
3
A community-based trial of educational interventions with fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening uptake among blacks in community settings.一项基于社区的教育干预试验,采用粪便免疫化学检测来提高社区环境中黑人对结直肠癌筛查的接受度。
Cancer. 2016 Nov 15;122(21):3288-3296. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30207. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
4
Moderators of the effectiveness of an intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening through mailed fecal immunochemical test kits: results from a pragmatic randomized trial.通过邮寄粪便免疫化学检测试剂盒增加结直肠癌筛查效果的干预措施的调节因素:一项实用随机试验的结果。
Trials. 2020 Jan 15;21(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-4027-7.
5
Association Between Primary Care Visits and Colorectal Cancer Screening Outcomes in the Era of Population Health Outreach.人口健康推广时代初级保健就诊与结直肠癌筛查结果之间的关联
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Oct;31(10):1190-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3760-9. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
6
Physician-office vs home uptake of colorectal cancer screening using FOBT/FIT among screening-eligible US adults.在符合筛查条件的美国成年人中,使用粪便潜血试验/粪便免疫化学试验进行结直肠癌筛查,医生办公室与家庭的接受率比较。
Cancer Med. 2019 Dec;8(17):7408-7418. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2604. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
7
Factors associated with use and non-use of the Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) kit for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Response to a 2012 outreach screening program: a survey study.针对2012年的外展筛查项目,与使用和未使用粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)试剂盒进行结直肠癌筛查相关的因素:一项调查研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jun 11;15:546. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1908-x.
8
Interval Colorectal Cancer Incidence Among Subjects Undergoing Multiple Rounds of Fecal Immunochemical Testing.多次粪便免疫化学检测受试者的间期结直肠癌发病率。
Gastroenterology. 2017 Aug;153(2):439-447.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 5.
9
Uptake of colorectal cancer screening after mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach in a newly eligible 45-49-year-old community health center population.邮寄粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)外展后,新纳入的 45-49 岁社区卫生中心人群中结直肠癌筛查的参与情况。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Dec;34(Suppl 1):125-133. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01717-8. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
10
What are the contextual risk factors for low colorectal cancer screening uptake in El Paso County, Texas? Spatial cross-sectional analysis.德克萨斯州埃尔帕索县结直肠癌筛查参与率低的情境风险因素有哪些?空间横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 10;10(10):e038342. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038342.

引用本文的文献

1
Sociodemographic Factors Associated with Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Testing Uptake During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Substance Use Linked to Reduced Screening Completion in Younger Adults.新冠疫情期间与邮寄粪便免疫化学检测接受情况相关的社会人口学因素:物质使用与年轻人筛查完成率降低有关。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024 Sep;55(3):1453-1455. doi: 10.1007/s12029-024-01057-z. Epub 2024 May 1.
2
Sociodemographic variations in the uptake of faecal immunochemical tests in primary care: a retrospective study.社会人口统计学因素对初级保健中粪便免疫化学检测接受率的影响:一项回顾性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Oct 26;73(736):e843-e849. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0033. Print 2023 Nov.
3
Using GIS to Identify Priority Sites for Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs in Texas Health Centers.
利用地理信息系统确定德克萨斯州医疗中心结直肠癌筛查项目的优先地点。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Mar 2;20:E10. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.220205.
4
Urban density differences in colorectal cancer screening participation and screening yield in The Netherlands.荷兰结直肠癌筛查参与率和筛查阳性率的城市密度差异
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Apr 5;27:101791. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101791. eCollection 2022 Jun.
5
The Role of Health Disparities and Socioeconomic Status in Emergent Gastrointestinal Procedures.健康差异和社会经济地位在急诊胃肠道手术中的作用。
Health Equity. 2021 Apr 30;5(1):270-276. doi: 10.1089/heq.2020.0141. eCollection 2021.
6
Spatial Insights for Understanding Colorectal Cancer Screening in Disproportionately Affected Populations, Central Texas, 2019.了解中得克萨斯州受影响不成比例人群中结直肠癌筛查情况的空间洞察,2019 年。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2021 Mar 4;18:E20. doi: 10.5888/pcd18.200362.