Christy Shannon M, Davis Stacy N, Williams Kimberly R, Zhao Xiuhua, Govindaraju Swapomthi K, Quinn Gwendolyn P, Vadaparampil Susan T, Lin Hui-Yi, Sutton Steven K, Roethzeim Richard R, Shibata David, Meade Cathy D, Gwede Clement K
Division of Population Science, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.
Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.
Cancer. 2016 Nov 15;122(21):3288-3296. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30207. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
Intervention studies among individuals in diverse community settings are needed to reduce health disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and mortality rates. The current study compared the efficacy of 2 intervention conditions promoting CRC screening among black individuals.
Black individuals ages 50 to 75 years (N = 330) were recruited in community settings in 4 Tampa Bay counties. After obtaining consent and conducting a baseline interview to assess sociodemographic and health-related variables, participants received either a culturally targeted CRC photonovella booklet plus a fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kit or a standard CRC screening brochure plus an FIT kit. The primary outcome was FIT kit screening uptake.
FIT screening uptake at 6 months was 86.7% overall (90.3% in the brochure group and 81.9% in the photonovella group). Controlling for baseline between-group differences, there was no influence of intervention on FIT kit uptake (P = .756). Significant predictors of not returning an FIT kit included being unable to work (P = .010), having higher religious belief scores (P = .015), and living farther from the cancer center (P = .015).
Providing FIT kits and educational print materials to black individuals in community settings resulted in high rates of CRC screening. The study also identified subgroups of participants who were less likely to return an FIT kit and provides insight for future interventions. Cancer 2016;122:3288-3296. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
需要在不同社区环境中对个体进行干预研究,以减少结直肠癌(CRC)筛查和死亡率方面的健康差异。本研究比较了两种干预条件在促进黑人个体进行CRC筛查方面的效果。
在坦帕湾地区4个县的社区环境中招募了年龄在50至75岁之间的黑人个体(N = 330)。在获得同意并进行基线访谈以评估社会人口统计学和健康相关变量后,参与者要么收到一本针对特定文化的CRC光影故事手册以及一个粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)试剂盒,要么收到一本标准的CRC筛查手册以及一个FIT试剂盒。主要结局是FIT试剂盒筛查的接受率。
6个月时FIT筛查的总体接受率为86.7%(手册组为90.3%,光影故事手册组为81.9%)。在控制组间基线差异后,干预对FIT试剂盒接受率没有影响(P = 0.756)。未归还FIT试剂盒的显著预测因素包括无法工作(P = 0.010)、宗教信仰得分较高(P = 0.015)以及居住距离癌症中心较远(P = 0.015)。
在社区环境中为黑人个体提供FIT试剂盒和教育印刷材料导致了较高的CRC筛查率。该研究还确定了不太可能归还FIT试剂盒的参与者亚组,并为未来的干预提供了见解。《癌症》2016年;122:3288 - 3296。© 2016美国癌症协会。