College of Artificial Intelligence, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Sep 14;18(9):3108. doi: 10.3390/s18093108.
A novel multi-class classification method named the voting-cross support vector machine (SVM) method was proposed in this study, for classifying vehicle targets in wireless sensor networks. The advantages and disadvantages of available methods were summarized, after a comparative analysis of commonly used multi-objective classification algorithms. To improve the classification accuracy of multi-class classification and ensure the low complexity of the algorithm for engineering implementation on wireless sensor network (WSN) nodes, a framework was proposed for cross-matching and voting on the category to which the vehicle belongs after combining the advantages of the directed acyclic graph SVM (DAGSVM) method and binary-tree SVM method. The SVM classifier was selected as the basis two-class classifier in the framework, after comparing the classification performance of several commonly used methods. We utilized datasets acquired from a real-world experiment to validate the proposed method. The calculated results demonstrated that the cross-voting SVM method could effectively increase the classification accuracy for the classification of multiple vehicle targets, with a limited increase in the algorithm complexity. The application of the cross-voting SVM method effectively improved the target classification accuracy (by approximately 7%), compared with the DAGSVM method and the binary-tree SVM method, whereas time consumption decreased by approximately 70% compared to the DAGSVM method.
本研究提出了一种名为投票交叉支持向量机(SVM)的新的多类分类方法,用于对无线传感器网络中的车辆目标进行分类。在对常用的多目标分类算法进行比较分析后,总结了现有方法的优缺点。为了提高多类分类的分类精度,并确保在无线传感器网络(WSN)节点上进行工程实现的算法复杂度低,在结合有向无环图 SVM(DAGSVM)方法和二叉树 SVM 方法的优点后,提出了一种对车辆所属类别进行交叉匹配和投票的框架。在比较了几种常用方法的分类性能后,选择 SVM 分类器作为框架中的基础二类分类器。我们利用从真实实验中获得的数据集来验证所提出的方法。计算结果表明,交叉投票 SVM 方法可以有效地提高多车辆目标分类的分类精度,同时算法复杂度增加有限。与 DAGSVM 方法和二叉树 SVM 方法相比,交叉投票 SVM 方法的应用有效提高了目标分类的准确性(约 7%),而与 DAGSVM 方法相比,时间消耗降低了约 70%。