Abrams Tamara, Abrams Stephen, Sivagurunathan Koneswaran, Moravan Veronika, Hellen Warren, Elman Gary, Amaechi Bennett, Mandelis Andreas
Quantum Dental Technologies Inc., Toronto, ON M6B 1L3, Canada.
VM Stats, Toronto, ON M5A 4R3, Canada.
Dent J (Basel). 2018 Sep 16;6(3):47. doi: 10.3390/dj6030047.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of visual examination (International Caries Detection and Assessment System-ICDAS II), light-emitting diodes (LED) fluorescence (SPECTRA), laser fluorescence (DIAGNODent, DD), photothermal radiometry and modulated luminescence (PTR-LUM, The Canary System, CS) to detect natural decay beneath resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGIC) and compomer restorations in vitro. Twenty-seven extracted human molars and premolars, consisting of 2 control teeth, 10 visually healthy/sound and 15 teeth with natural cavitated lesions, were selected. For the carious teeth, caries was removed leaving some carious tissue on one wall of the preparation. For the sound teeth, 3 mm deep cavity preparations were made. All cavities were restored with RMGIC or compomer restorative materials. Sixty-eight sites (4 sites on sound unrestored teeth, 21 sound sites and 43 carious sites with restorations) were selected. CS and DD triplicate measurements were done at 2, 1.5, 0.5, and 0 mm away from the margin of the restoration (MOR). SPECTRA images were taken, and two dentists provided ICDAS II scoring for the restored surfaces. The SPECTRA data and images were inconclusive due to signal interference from the restorations. Visual examinations of the restored tooth surfaces were able to identify 5 of the 15 teeth with caries. In these situations, the teeth were ranked as having ICDAS II 1 or 2 rankings, but they could not identify the location of the caries or depth of the lesion. CS and DD were able to differentiate between sound and carious tissue at the MOR, but larger variation in measurement, and poorer accuracy, was observed for DD. It was concluded that the CS has the potential to detect secondary caries around RMGIC and compomer restorations more accurately than the other modalities used in this study.
本研究的目的是评估视觉检查(国际龋病检测与评估系统-ICDAS II)、发光二极管(LED)荧光(SPECTRA)、激光荧光(DIAGNODent,DD)、光热辐射测量和调制发光(PTR-LUM,金丝雀系统,CS)在体外检测树脂改性玻璃离子(RMGIC)和复合体修复体下方自然龋坏的能力。选取了27颗拔除的人类磨牙和前磨牙,包括2颗对照牙、10颗视觉上健康/完好的牙齿以及15颗有自然龋洞病变的牙齿。对于龋病牙齿,去除龋坏组织,在制备洞形的一侧壁上保留一些龋坏组织。对于完好的牙齿,制备3mm深的洞形。所有洞形均用RMGIC或复合体修复材料进行修复。选取了68个部位(4个在未修复的完好牙齿上的部位、21个完好部位以及43个有修复体的龋坏部位)。在距离修复体边缘(MOR)2mm、1.5mm、0.5mm和0mm处对CS和DD进行三次测量。拍摄SPECTRA图像,两名牙医对修复表面进行ICDAS II评分。由于修复体的信号干扰,SPECTRA数据和图像无法得出结论。对修复后的牙齿表面进行视觉检查,能够识别出15颗龋病牙齿中的5颗。在这些情况下,牙齿被评为ICDAS II 1级或2级,但无法确定龋坏的位置或病变的深度。CS和DD能够在MOR处区分完好组织和龋坏组织,但观察到DD的测量变化更大,准确性更差。得出的结论是,与本研究中使用的其他方法相比,CS有潜力更准确地检测RMGIC和复合体修复体周围的继发龋。