Suppr超能文献

偏见与精神疾病患者量表(PPMI):结构与效度。

The Prejudice towards People with Mental Illness (PPMI) scale: structure and validity.

机构信息

Research School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Building 39 Science Road, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 12;18(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1871-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although there is a substantial body of research on the stigma associated with mental illness, much of the extant research has not explicitly focused on the concept of prejudice, which drives discriminatory behaviour. Further, research that has investigated prejudice towards people with mental illness has conceptual, theoretical and psychometric limitations. To address these shortcomings, we sought to develop a new measure, the Prejudice towards People with Mental Illness (PPMI) scale, based on an improved conceptualisation and integration of the stigma and prejudice areas of research.

METHODS

In developing the new scale, we undertook a thematic analysis of existing conceptualisations and measures to identify a pool of potential items for the scale which were subsequently assessed for fidelity and content validity by expert raters. We tested the structure, reliability, and validity of the scale across three studies (Study 1 N = 301; Study 2 N = 164; Study 3 N = 495) using exploratory factor, confirmatory factor, correlational, multiple regression, and ordinal logistic regression analyses using both select and general community samples.

RESULTS

Study 1 identified four factors underlying prejudice towards people with mental illness: fear/avoidance, malevolence, authoritarianism, and unpredictability. It also confirmed the nomological network, that is, the links of these attitudes with the proposed theoretical antecedents and consequences. Studies 2 and 3 further supported the factor structure of the measure, and provided additional evidence for the nomological network.

CONCLUSIONS

We argue that research into prejudice towards people with mental illness will benefit from the new measure and theoretical framework.

摘要

背景

尽管有大量关于与精神疾病相关的污名的研究,但现有的许多研究并未明确关注导致歧视行为的偏见概念。此外,调查对精神疾病患者的偏见的研究存在概念、理论和心理测量方面的局限性。为了解决这些不足,我们试图根据污名和偏见研究领域的改进概念化和整合,开发一种新的衡量标准,即对精神疾病患者的偏见(PPMI)量表。

方法

在开发新量表时,我们对现有概念化和衡量标准进行了主题分析,以确定量表的潜在项目池,然后由专家评估者评估这些项目的忠实度和内容效度。我们使用探索性因素分析、验证性因素分析、相关性分析、多元回归分析和有序逻辑回归分析,在三个研究(研究 1,N=301;研究 2,N=164;研究 3,N=495)中测试了量表的结构、信度和效度,这些研究使用了特定和一般社区样本。

结果

研究 1 确定了对精神疾病患者的偏见的四个潜在因素:恐惧/回避、恶意、威权主义和不可预测性。它还证实了理论关联,即这些态度与拟议的理论前因和后果之间的联系。研究 2 和 3 进一步支持了该衡量标准的因素结构,并提供了该理论关联的额外证据。

结论

我们认为,对精神疾病患者的偏见的研究将受益于新的衡量标准和理论框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0afb/6142319/862edd85d568/12888_2018_1871_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验