• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全膝关节假体周围关节感染的死亡率。

Mortality During Total Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2018 Dec;33(12):3783-3788. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.021. Epub 2018 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.021
PMID:30224099
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are fraught with multiple complications including poor patient-reported outcomes, disability, reinfection, disarticulation, and even death. We sought to perform a systematic review asking the question: (1) What is the mortality rate of a PJI of the knee undergoing 2-stage revision for infection? (2) Has this rate improved over time? (3) How does this compare to a normal cohort of individuals?

METHODS

We performed a database search in MEDLINE/EMBASE, PubMed, and all relevant reference studies using the following keywords: "periprosthetic joint infection," "mortality rates," "total knee arthroplasty," and "outcomes after two stage revision." Two hundred forty-two relevant studies and citations were identified, and 14 studies were extracted and included in the review.

RESULTS

A total of 20,719 patients underwent 2-stage revision for total knee PJI. Average age was 66 years. Mean mortality percentage reported was 14.4% (1.7%-34.0%) with average follow-up 3.8 years (0.25-9 years). One-year mortality rate was 4.33% (3.14%-5.51%) after total knee PJI with an increase of 3.13% per year mortality thereafter (r = 0.76 [0.49, 0.90], P < .001). Five-year mortality was 21.64%. When comparing the national age-adjusted mortality (Actuarial Life Table) and the reported 1-year mortality risk in this meta-analysis, the risk of death after total knee PJI is significantly increased, with an odds ratio of 3.05 (95% confidence interval, 2.69-3.44; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The mortality rate after 2-stage total knee revision for infection is very high. When counseling a patient regarding complications of this disease, death should be discussed.

摘要

背景

人工关节周围感染(PJI)并发症众多,包括患者报告结局不佳、残疾、再感染、关节脱位,甚至死亡。我们旨在进行一项系统评价,提出以下问题:(1)接受 2 期翻修治疗感染的膝关节 PJI 的死亡率是多少?(2)该死亡率是否随时间改善?(3)与正常人群相比如何?

方法

我们在 MEDLINE/EMBASE、PubMed 和所有相关参考文献中使用以下关键词进行数据库检索:“人工关节周围感染”、“死亡率”、“全膝关节置换术”和“2 期翻修后结局”。共确定了 242 项相关研究和参考文献,提取并纳入了 14 项研究进行综述。

结果

共有 20719 例患者接受了全膝关节 PJI 的 2 期翻修。平均年龄为 66 岁。报告的平均死亡率为 14.4%(1.7%-34.0%),平均随访时间为 3.8 年(0.25-9 年)。全膝关节 PJI 后 1 年死亡率为 4.33%(3.14%-5.51%),此后每年死亡率增加 3.13%(r=0.76 [0.49, 0.90],P<0.001)。5 年死亡率为 21.64%。将全膝关节 PJI 后 1 年的死亡率与国家年龄调整死亡率( actuarial life table)进行比较,发现全膝关节 PJI 后死亡的风险显著增加,优势比为 3.05(95%置信区间,2.69-3.44;P<0.001)。

结论

接受 2 期全膝关节翻修治疗感染的死亡率非常高。在向患者提供这种疾病并发症的咨询时,应该讨论死亡问题。

相似文献

1
Mortality During Total Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection.全膝关节假体周围关节感染的死亡率。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Dec;33(12):3783-3788. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.021. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
2
Mortality During Total Hip Periprosthetic Joint Infection.全髋关节假体周围关节感染的死亡率。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7S):S337-S342. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.12.024. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
3
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is Associated With Increased Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality Relative to Noninfectious Revisions.关节置换翻修术治疗假体周围关节感染的术后发病率和死亡率相对高于非感染性翻修术。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):521-526. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.021. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
4
Does Prior Failed Debridement Compromise the Outcome of Subsequent Two-Stage Revision Done for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?初次清创失败是否会影响全膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染二期翻修的结果?
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Aug;33(8):2588-2594. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.087. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
5
Are We Winning or Losing the Battle With Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Trends in Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Mortality Risk for the Medicare Population.我们在与人工关节感染的战斗中是赢是输:医疗保险人群中人工关节感染和死亡风险的趋势。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Oct;33(10):3238-3245. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.05.042. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
6
In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Periprosthetic Joint Infection.人工关节感染患者的院内死亡率
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):948-952.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.027. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
7
Irrigation, Débridement, and Implant Retention for Recurrence of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Two-Stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Study.一期翻修治疗全膝关节置换术后假体周围感染翻修术后复发的冲洗、清创和假体保留:一项匹配队列研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug;34(8):1772-1775. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
8
Defining Treatment Success After 2-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.2 期关节置换术后假体周围关节感染治疗成功的定义。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Nov;33(11):3541-3546. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.06.015. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
9
Younger age is associated with a higher risk of early periprosthetic joint infection and aseptic mechanical failure after total knee arthroplasty.年龄较轻与全膝关节置换术后早期假体周围关节感染和无菌性机械故障的风险增加相关。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Apr 2;96(7):529-35. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00545.
10
Periprosthetic Infection Recurrence After 2-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty: Failure or Fate?两阶段翻修关节置换术后假体周围感染复发:是失败还是必然?
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):526-531. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Periprosthetic fracture in the setting of periprosthetic joint infection of the hip: evaluation and management of a single-centre cohort with forty six patients.髋关节假体周围感染情况下的假体周围骨折:对一个包含46例患者的单中心队列的评估与管理
Int Orthop. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1007/s00264-025-06636-8.
2
Antibiotic Elution from Cement Spacers and Its Influencing Factors.抗生素从骨水泥间隔物中的洗脱及其影响因素。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Jul 14;14(7):705. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14070705.
3
Chronic Anticoagulation is Associated With Significantly Increased Rates of Medical Complications, Periprosthetic Joint Infection, and Revision After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.
长期抗凝治疗与初次全膝关节置换术后医疗并发症、假体周围关节感染及翻修率显著增加相关。
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Jun 16;34:101749. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101749. eCollection 2025 Aug.
4
Outcomes of Transfemoral Osseointegration for Patients With Prior Amputation to Manage Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty.经股骨髓内固定术治疗既往截肢患者感染性全膝关节置换术的疗效
HSS J. 2025 Jun 17:15563316251343034. doi: 10.1177/15563316251343034.
5
The PJI-TNM Classification as Predictor for Revision-Free Implant Survival Rates in Patients with Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip or Knee Joint.PJI-TNM分类作为髋或膝关节假体周围感染患者无翻修植入物生存率的预测指标
Infect Dis Rep. 2025 May 15;17(3):54. doi: 10.3390/idr17030054.
6
Association of socioeconomic inequality and risk of periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty: a Danish cohort study of 75,141 cases.社会经济不平等与全膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染风险的关联:一项对75141例病例的丹麦队列研究
Acta Orthop. 2025 May 19;96:371-379. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2025.43678.
7
Recent advances in the application of nanotechnology in joint arthroplasty: a narrative review.纳米技术在关节置换术中应用的最新进展:一项叙述性综述。
Ann Jt. 2025 Apr 22;10:13. doi: 10.21037/aoj-24-50. eCollection 2025.
8
Bacteriophage therapy created the necessary conditions for successful antibiotic suppression in a periprosthetic hip joint infection: a Case Report.噬菌体疗法为人工髋关节周围感染的抗生素成功抑制创造了必要条件:病例报告
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 25;12:1564369. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1564369. eCollection 2025.
9
Comparison of surgical treatments for hip and knee periprosthetic joint infections using the desirability of outcome ranking in a prospective multicentre study.在前瞻性多中心研究中,利用结局期望排名比较髋膝关节假体周围感染的手术治疗方法。
J Bone Jt Infect. 2025 Mar 24;10(2):73-84. doi: 10.5194/jbji-10-73-2025. eCollection 2025.
10
Long-term outcome of periprosthetic joint infection following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A single-centre case series.单髁膝关节置换术后假体周围感染的长期结局:一项单中心病例系列研究
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Apr 3;12(2):e70230. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70230. eCollection 2025 Apr.