• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

带有确保安全使用要素的风险评估与缓解策略:目标与风险管理工具的契合

Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies With Elements to Assure Safe Use: Alignment of the Goals With the Tools to Manage Risk.

作者信息

Cronin Michael, Berger Susan, Seligman Paul J

机构信息

1 St. Johns University, New York, NY.

2 Amgen, Washington, DC, USA *Michael Cronin, formerly an intern at Amgen, is now pursuing a graduate degree at St. John's University.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2014 Nov;48(6):724-733. doi: 10.1177/2168479014527749.

DOI:10.1177/2168479014527749
PMID:30227470
Abstract

The Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 gave the FDA the authority to require drug sponsors to submit a risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS) program for those medicines with serious risks such that failure to effectively manage these risks would tip the benefit-risk balance. As of August 8, 2013, the 34 distinct individual and shared REMS programs that have specific elements to assure safe use (ETASU) were reviewed to ascertain the types of risks managed, the goals of the REMS, and the tools that were employed targeting prescribers, health care facilities, pharmacists, and particular conditions for safe use. Most REMS (65%) have a combination of risk mitigation and educational goals, but 4 REMS programs (12%) have exclusively educational goals. Preventing fetotoxicity (25%) is the most common risk managed by REMS with ETASU. Seventy-nine percent of ETASU REMS employ prescriber-based tools that include performing laboratory testing (eg, pregnancy, hepatic enzymes) or monitoring (eg, ophthalmologic examinations, documenting vaccination). The goals of REMS programs should focus on measurable behaviors that directly reduce risk. The tools that are employed should create the appropriate conditions for safe use. With the number of programs and the plethora of tools applied, serious consideration should be given to better integration of risk management into health care and pharmacy systems that are best equipped to manage such risks.

摘要

2007年《食品药品管理局修正案法案》赋予美国食品药品管理局(FDA)权力,要求药品申办者为那些具有严重风险的药物提交一份风险评估和缓解策略(REMS)计划,因为若不能有效管理这些风险,将会打破受益风险平衡。截至2013年8月8日,对34个具有确保安全使用特定要素(ETASU)的不同的单独和共享REMS计划进行了审查,以确定所管理风险的类型、REMS的目标以及针对开处方者、医疗机构、药剂师和安全使用的特定条件所采用的工具。大多数REMS(65%)具有风险缓解和教育目标的组合,但有4个REMS计划(12%)仅有教育目标。预防胎儿毒性(25%)是由带有ETASU的REMS管理的最常见风险。79%的带有ETASU的REMS采用基于开处方者的工具,包括进行实验室检测(如妊娠、肝酶检测)或监测(如眼科检查、记录疫苗接种)。REMS计划的目标应侧重于直接降低风险的可衡量行为。所采用的工具应创造安全使用的适当条件。鉴于计划数量众多且应用的工具繁杂,应认真考虑将风险管理更好地整合到最有能力管理此类风险的医疗保健和药学系统中。

相似文献

1
Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies With Elements to Assure Safe Use: Alignment of the Goals With the Tools to Manage Risk.带有确保安全使用要素的风险评估与缓解策略:目标与风险管理工具的契合
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2014 Nov;48(6):724-733. doi: 10.1177/2168479014527749.
2
Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMSs): Are They Improving Drug Safety? A Critical Review of REMSs Requiring Elements to Assure Safe Use (ETASU).风险评估与缓解策略(REMSs):它们是否在提高药物安全性?对需要确保安全使用要素(ETASU)的REMSs的批判性综述。
Drugs R D. 2017 Jun;17(2):245-254. doi: 10.1007/s40268-017-0175-y.
3
Understanding risk evaluation and mitigation strategies in organ transplantation.理解器官移植中的风险评估和缓解策略。
Pharmacotherapy. 2011 Jul;31(7):714-22. doi: 10.1592/phco.31.7.714.
4
The US Food and Drug Administration's Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) Program - Current Status and Future Direction.美国食品药品监督管理局的风险评估与缓解策略(REMS)计划——现状与未来方向
Clin Ther. 2016 Dec;38(12):2526-2532. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.11.007. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
5
Adaptation for Regulatory Application: A Content Analysis of FDA Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies Assessment Plans (2014-2018) Using RE-AIM.监管应用的适应性:使用RE-AIM对美国食品药品监督管理局风险评估和缓解策略评估计划(2014 - 2018年)进行的内容分析
Front Public Health. 2020 Feb 25;8:43. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00043. eCollection 2020.
6
Patient and Caregiver Experiences With and Perceptions of Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Programs With Elements to Assure Safe Use.患者和照护者对具有确保安全使用要素的风险评估和缓解策略计划的体验和看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2144386. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44386.
7
Pragmatic applications of implementation science frameworks to regulatory science: an assessment of FDA Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) (2014-2018).实施科学框架在监管科学中的务实应用:对 FDA 风险评估和缓解策略 (REMS) 的评估 (2014-2018 年)。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 6;21(1):779. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06808-3.
8
Physician experiences with and perceptions of risk evaluation and mitigation strategy programs with elements to assure safe use.医生对包含确保安全使用要素的风险评估和缓解策略计划的经验和看法。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 6;18(7):e0288008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288008. eCollection 2023.
9
Risk evaluation and mitigation strategies: impact on patients, health care providers, and health systems.风险评估和缓解策略:对患者、医疗保健提供者和卫生系统的影响。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009 Dec 15;66(24 Suppl 7):S6-S12. doi: 10.2146/ajhp090461.
10
Risk evaluation and mitigation strategies: a focus on the mycophenolic acid preparations.风险评估与缓解策略:聚焦于霉酚酸制剂
Prog Transplant. 2014 Mar;24(1):33-6. doi: 10.7182/pit2014521.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimization of REMS Program Compliance in a Large Academic Health System.大型学术医疗系统中风险评估与缓解策略(REMS)项目合规性的优化
Innov Pharm. 2021 May 11;12(2). doi: 10.24926/iip.v12i2.3853. eCollection 2021.